This study describes consumers who hire friends, family members, or strangers as paid personal assistants and compares service satisfaction among the three groups. From surveying 511 consumers of self-directed home care services, the authors found that consumers who hire friends as workers are younger and more educated than consumers who hire family members and strangers, and they are more impaired than consumers with strangers as workers. The friend cohort experiences more stability with their personal assistants than does the stranger cohort but not as much stability as the family cohort. On some dimensions of consumer satisfaction, friends as workers are perceived by consumers to be either the same as or better than strangers, but they also are perceived as either the same as or worse than family workers. Using friends as paid workers is an important resource. Researchers and policy makers should further explore this approach because the need for home-based personal assistance continues to increase.
Allen, S.M., & Ciambrone, D. (2003). Community care for people with disability: Blurring boundaries between formal and informal caregivers. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 207—226.
2.
Allen, S.M., & Mor, V. (1997). The prevalence and consequences of unmet need: Contrasts between older and younger adults with disability. Medical Care, 35, 1132—1148.
3.
Atherly, A., Kane, R.L., & Smith, M.A. (2004). Older adults' satisfaction with integrated capitated health and long-term care. Gerontologist, 44, 348—357.
4.
Barer, B.M. (1992). The relationship between homebound older people and their home care workers, or “the pas de deux” of home care . Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 19, 129—147.
5.
Bauld, L., Chesterman, J., & Judge, K. (2000). Measuring satisfaction with social care amongst older service users: Issues from the literature. Health and Social Care in the Community, 8, 316—330.
6.
Benjamin, A.E., Franke, T.M., Matthias, R.E., & Park, E. (1999). Consumer direction and in-home services: Recipient perspectives on family and non-family service provision. Journal of Rehabilitation Administration, 22, 233—247.
7.
Benjamin, A.E., & Matthias, R.E. (1995, June). Alternative models of personal assistance services: Revised recommended measures. Report submitted to theU.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
8.
Benjamin, A.E., Matthias, R.E., & Franke, T.M. (2000). Comparing consumer-directed and agency models for providing supportive services at home. Health Services Research, 35, 351—366.
9.
Dale, S., Brown, R., Phillips, B., Schore, J., & Carlson, B. (2003). The effect of consumer direction on personal assistance received in Arkansas. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research. Retrieved February 1, 2005 , from http://www.cashandcounseling.org/downloads/112304ARuseimpacts.pdf
DeJong, G., Batavia, A.I., & McKnew, L.B. (1992). The independent living model of personal assistance in national long-term care policy. Generations, 16, 89—95.
12.
Doty, P. (1986). Family care: The role of public policy. Milbank Quarterly, 64, 34—75.
13.
Doty, P., Benjamin, A.E., Matthias, R.E., & Franke, T.M. (1999, April). In-home supportive services for the elderly and disabled. Nontechnical summary report prepared for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Retrieved October 10, 2003, from http://aspe.os.dhhs.gov/daltcp/reports/ihss.htm
14.
Dyeson, T.B. (2000). Burden self-image: A mediating variable of depressive symptoms among chronically ill care recipients. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 33, 17—33.
15.
Eustis, N.N., & Fischer, L.R. (1991). Relationships between home care clients and their workers: Implications for quality of care. The Gerontologist , 31, 447—456.
16.
Eustis, N.N., Kane, R.A., & Fischer, L.R. (1993). Home care quality and the home care worker: Beyond quality assurance as usual. The Gerontologist, 33, 64—73.
17.
Feldman, P., Sapienza, A.M., & Kane, N.M. (1990). Who cares for them? Workers in the home care industry . New York: Greenwood.
18.
Forbes, D.A. (1996). Clarification of the constructs of satisfaction and dissatisfaction with home care. Public Health Nursing , 13, 377—385.
19.
Gaugler, J.E., Kane, R.L., & Kane, R.A. (2002). Family care for older adults with disabilities: Toward more targeted and interpretable research. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 54, 205—231.
20.
Geron, S.M. (2000). The quality of consumer-directed long-term care . Generations, 24, 66—73.
21.
Himes, C.L., & Reidy, E.B. (2000). The role of friends in caregiving. Research on Aging, 22, 315—335.
22.
Kane, R.A., Illston, L.H., Eustis, N., & Kane, R.L. (1991). Quality of home care: Concept and measurement . Minneapolis: School of Public Health, University of Minnesota.
23.
Kane, R.A., Kane, R.L., Illston, L.H., & Eustis, N. (1994). Perspectives on home care quality. Health Care Financing Review, 16, 69—89.
24.
Karner, T.X. (1998). Professional caring: Homecare workers as fictive kin. Journal of Aging Studies, 12, 69—83.
25.
Katz, S., & Akpom, C.A. (1976). A measure of primary sociobiological functions . International Journal of Health Services, 6, 493—508.
26.
Keigher, S.M. (1994). Supporting natural helpers: A unique approach to thinking about client-worker relationships. In J. Handy & C. K. Schuerman (Eds.), Challenges and innovations in homecare. San Francisco: American Society on Aging.
27.
Kish, L. (1967). Survey sampling. New York: John Wiley.
28.
Lawton, M.P. (1971). The functional assessment of elderly people. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 19, 465—481.
29.
Leon, J. (1994). National Home Care Survey Unpublished instrument, Project Hope, Bethesda, MD.
30.
Lyons, K.S., Zarit, S.H., & Townsend, A.L. (2000). Families and formal service usage: Stability and change in patterns of interface. Aging and Mental Health, 4, 234—243.
31.
Matthias, R.E., & Benjamin, A.E. (2003). Abuse and neglect of clients in agency-based and consumer-directed home care. Health and Social Work, 28, 174—184.
32.
Nocon, A., & Pearson, M. (2000). The roles of friends and neighbours in providing support for older people. Ageing and Society, 20, 341—367.
33.
Oktay, J.S., & Tompkins, C.J. (2004). Personal assistance providers' mistreatment of disabled adults. Health and Social Work, 29, 177—188.
34.
Ong, P., Rickles, J., Matthias, R.E., & Benjamin, A.E. (2002). California caregivers: Final labor market analysis Report prepared for the California Employment Development Department, Sacramento.
35.
Piercy, K. (2001). “We couldn't do without them”: The value of close relationships between older adults and their nonfamily caregivers . Generations, 25, 41—47.
36.
Polivka, L., & Salmon, J.R. (2001). Consumer-directed care: An ethical, empirical, and practical guide for state policymakers (Report funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Independent Choices Grant No. 032246). Tampa, FL: Florida Policy Exchange Center on Aging .
37.
Roberto, K.A., & Scott, J.P. (1984). Friendship patterns among older women. Journal of Aging and Human Development, 19, 1—10.
38.
Spillman, B.C., & Pezzin, L.E. (2000). Potential and active family caregivers: Changing networks and the “sandwich generation.” Milbank Quarterly, 78, 347—373.
39.
Squillace, M.R., & Firman, J. (2002). The myths and realities of consumer directed services for older persons (The National Council on Aging and the National Association of State Units on Aging, funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation) Retrieved July 14, 2004, from http://www.consumerdirection.org/reso_mandr.php
40.
StataCorp. (1997). STATA statistical software: Release 5.0. College Station, Texas: Author.
41.
Tilly, J., & Wiener, J.M. (2001). Consumer-directed home and community services programs in eights states: Policy issues for older people and government. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 12, 1—26.
42.
Ware, J.E., Jr., & Sherbourne, C.D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Medical Care, 30, 473—483.
43.
Wolf, D.A. (2001). Population change: Friend or foe of the chronic care system? Health Affairs, 20, 28—42.
44.
Wolff, J.L., & Agree, E.M. (2004). Depression among recipients of informal care: The effects of reciprocity, respect, and adequacy of support. Journals of Gerontology Series B—Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59, S173—S180.
45.
Woodruff, L., & Applebaum, R. (1996). Assuring the quality of in-home supportive services: A consumer perspective. Journal of Aging Studies, 10, 157—169.
