Albrecht, G.L., & Develiger, P.J. (1998). The disability paradox: High quality against all odds. Social Science & Medicine , 50, 757—759.
2.
Andrews, K., Murphy, L., Munday, R., & Littlewood, C. (1996). Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: Retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit. British Medical Journal, 313, 13—16.
3.
Beauchamp, T.L. (1999). The failure of theories of personhood. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 9, 309—324.
4.
Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927).
5.
Burstyn, V. (1991, May 14). Technologizing procreation. CBC Idea. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Toronto, Canada.
6.
Burstyn, V. (1993). Breeding discontent. Saturday Night, 15—16, 62—67. (June)
7.
Callahan, D. (2003). Principlism and communitarianism. Journal of MedicalEthics, 29, 287—281.
8.
Childs, N.L., Mercer, W.N., & Childs, H.W. (1993). Accuracy of diagnosis of persistent vegetative state. Neurology, 3(43), 1465—1467.
9.
Dresser, R. (2004). Schiavo: A hard case makes questionable law. Hastings Center Report, 33, 8—9.
10.
Elliott, C. (2001). Attitudes, souls, and persons: Children with severe neurological impairment. In C. Elliott (Ed.), Slow cures and bad philosophers: Essays in Wittgenstein, medicine, and bioethics (pp. 89—102). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
11.
Ferguson, P.M., Gartner, A., & Lipsky, D.K. (2000). The experience of disability in families: A synthesis of research and parent narratives. In E. Parens & A. Asch (Eds.), Prenatal testing and disability rights (pp. 72—94). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
12.
Fletcher, J. (1973). Ethics and euthanasia. The American Journal of Nursing, 670—675.
13.
Gallagher, R. (2004). Genetics is not politically correct. Scientist (Philadelphia, Pa.), 21, 6.
14.
Harris, J. (1988). Clones, genes, and immortality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
Harris, J. (2000). Is there a coherent social conception of disability? Journal of MedicalEthics, 26, 95—100.
16.
Harris, J. (2001). One principle and three fallacies of disability studies. Journal of MedicalEthics, 27, 383—387.
17.
Kemp, E.J. (1993). Paternalism, disability, and the right to die. Issues in Law &Medicine, 9(1), 73—79.
18.
Kittay, E.F. (1999). Love's labor. New York: Routledge.
19.
Koch, T. (1996). Living vs dying `with dignity': A new perspective on the euthanasia debate. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 5, 50—60.
20.
Koch, T. (2000). Life quality vs. the `quality of life' assumptions underlying prospective quality of life instruments in health care planning . Social Science & Medicine, 51, 419—428.
21.
Koch, T. (2001). Future states: Testing the axioms underlying prospective, future-oriented, health planning instruments. Social Science & Medicine, 52, 453—466.
22.
Koch, T. (2003). Disability and difference: Balancing social and physical constructions. Journal of MedicalEthics, 27, 370—376.
23.
Lindemann Nelson, H. (2002). What child is this?The Hastings Center Report, 32(6), 29—38.
24.
McBryde Johnson, H. (2003, February 16). Unspeakable conversations: Or, how I spent one day as a token cripple at Princeton University. The New York Times Magazine, 50—55, 74—79.
25.
Nance, W.E., & Kearsey, M.J. (2004). Relevance of connexin deafness (DVNB1) to human evolution. American Journal of Human Genetics, 74, 1081—1087.
26.
Newell, C. (1999). The social nature of disability, disease, and genetics: A response to Gilliam, Persson, Draper and Chadwick. Journal of MedicalEthics, 25, 172—175.
27.
Reindal, S.M. (2000). Disability, gene therapy and eugenics—A challenge to John Harris. Journal of MedicalEthics, 26, 89—94.
28.
Pernick, M. (1996).The black stork: Eugenics and the death of `defective' babies in American medicine and motion pictures since 1915. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Pope John Paul II.2004. Address of John Paul II to the participants in the International Congress on life-sustaining treatments and vegetative states: Scientific advances and ethical dilemmas. 20 March. Vatican, Rome, Italy. http://www.vatican.va/holy-father/johnpaulii/speeches/2004/march/documents/hfipiispe20040320congress-fiamcen.html.
30.
Post, S.G. (1993). Inquiries in bioethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
31.
Post, S.G. (1995). The moral challenge of Alzheimer disease. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
32.
Pueschel, S.M. (1989). Ethical considerations in the life of a child with Down syndrome. Issues in Law &Medicine, 5(1), 87—99.
33.
Reilly, P.R. (1991). The surgical solution: A history of involuntary sterilization in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
34.
Sacks, O. (1989). Seeing voices: A journey into the world of the deaf. Berkeley: University of California Press.
35.
Singer, P. (1995). Rethinking life and death: The collapse of our traditional ethics. New York: St. Martin's Press.
36.
Stainton, T., & Besser, H. (1998). The positive impact of children with an intellectual disability on the family. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 23, 57—70.
37.
Thomasma, D., & Loewy, E.H. (1997). A dialogue on species-specific rights: Humans and animals in bioethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 6(4), 435—444.
38.
Tresch, D.D., Sims, F.H., Duthie, E.H., Goldstein, M.D., & Lane, P.S. (1991). Clinical characteristics of patients in the persistent vegetative state. Archives ofInternal Medicine, 151, 930—932.
39.
Vehmas, S. (2004). Dimensions of disability. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 13, 1340.
40.
Zuckoff, M. (2002). Choosing Naia: A family's journey. Boston: Beacon Press.