Views of Disabled People Regarding Legalized Assisted Suicide Before and After a Balanced Informational Presentation

Abstract

A questionnaire on views regarding legalized assisted suicide was administered to 29 individuals with disabilities (12 participants with various disabilities; 17 participants with multiple sclerosis) before and after their exposure to a “pro” versus “con” informational presentation focusing on disability and assisted suicide. Results indicated that participants who expressed neutrality before the presentation were more likely than participants who had a predetermined position (either opposing or supporting legalization) to change their responses from pretest to posttest. Changes in views, when they occurred, tended toward opposition to legalized assisted suicide. Following the presentations, participants were fairly evenly divided in their endorsement versus opposition to legalized assisted suicide for terminally ill people. Most were opposed, however, to the legalization of assisted suicide for persons with incurable disabilities. Race/ethnicity and gender of participant were important factors, in that women, African Americans, and Latinos were least likely to support assisted suicide. The majority of participants indicated that legalized assisted suicide could lead to involuntary deaths and that safeguards would not prevent abuse. It was concluded that balanced disability-relevant information had a mild effect on attitudes in this study, and that differing levels of knowledge may account for some of the differences in views held by disabled people regarding legalized assisted suicide.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alston, R.J. , Bell, T.J. , & Feist-Price, S. (1996). Racial identity and African Americans with disabilities: Theoretical and practical considerations. Journal of Rehabilitation, 62(3), 11—15.

Baron, C.H. , Bergstresser, C. , Brock, D.W. , Cole, G.F. , Dorfman, N.S. , Johnson, J.A. , et al. (1996). A model statute to authorize and regulate physician-assisted suicide. Harvard Journal of Legislation , 33(1), 1—34.

Batavia, A. (1997). Disability and physician-assisted suicide. The New England Journal of Medicine, 336, 1671—1673.

Cheyfitz, K. (1997, March 3). The suicide machine. Detroit Free Press, p. A7—A9.

Corbet, B. (1999). Assisted suicide: What do we think? New Mobility. Retrieved March 30, 2003, from http://www.newmobility.com/review_article.cfm?id=191&action=browse

Fadem, P. , Perry, M. , & Minkler, M. (2001). Attitudes of people with disabilities toward death with dignity/physician assisted suicide legislation: Broadening the dialogue . Unpublished report.

Fadem, P. , Blum, K. , Moore, L. , & Rogers, J. (2002, June). Our choice to live or die: A disability community study of death with dignity legislation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Disability Studies , Oakland, CA.

Fadem, P. , Minkler, M. , Perry, M. , Blum, K. , Moore, L. , & Rogers, J. (2003). Ethical challenges in community based participatory research: A case study from the San Francisco bay area disability community . In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein. (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 242—262). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hendin, H. (1997). Seduced by death: Doctors, patients, and the Dutch cure. New York: Norton.

10.

Humphry, D. (1991). Final exit: The practicalities of self-deliverance and assisted suicide for the dying. Eugene, OR: Hemlock Society.

11.

Minkler, M. , Fadem, P. , Perry, M. , Blum, K. , Moore, L. , & Rogers, J. (2002). Ethical dilemmas in participatory action research: A case study from the disability community. Health Education & Behavior, 29, 13—29.

12.

Quill, T.E. , Cassel, C.K. , & Meier, D.E. (1992). Care of the hopelessly ill: proposed clinical criteria for physician-assisted suicide. The New England Journal of Medicine, 327, 1380—1384.

13.

Vernon, A. (1998). Multiple oppression and the disabled people's movement. In T. Shakespeare (Ed.), The disability reader: Social science perspectives (pp. 201—210). New York: Cassell.