Do Shared Decision-Making Teams Discuss Special Education in Educational Reform Meetings?

Abstract

Authors of recent reports have concluded that U.S. educational reform has ignored special education (President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education, 2002). Little is known, however, about how local educational reform efforts consider special education when making decisions that may affect students in special education or special educators. The authors of this study examined the relationships between general education reform and special education by using focused analysis of qualitative data collected through a 3-year, comprehensive project in a suburban district that adopted shared decision-making (SDM) teams and site-based management. Data sources included observations of 86 SDM team meetings and interviews with team members and special educators. Findings from primary, middle, and high schools illustrated that there was little connection between general education reform and special education. Specifically, SDM teams seldom discussed special education. Most team members and special educators did not believe that special education was represented in team discussions. Some strategies for representing special education on SDM teams were occasionally effective (e.g., assigning a team member to represent special education for a specific topic). These findings have important implications for education policy because they are consistent with the 2002 report by the President's Commission. The authors also offer suggestions for future research and practice.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bogdan, R.C. , & Biklen, S.K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Comer, J. (1980, June). The New Haven School intervention project . Paper presented at the Strategies for Urban School Improvement Workshop Series, Washington, DC.

Fullan, M. (1985). Change processes and strategies at the local level . Elementary School Journal, 85, 391—421.

Goldman, P. , Dunlap, D.M. , & Conley, D.T. (1993). Facilitative power and nonstandardized solutions to school site restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly , 29(1), 69—92.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1401 (26).

Jenkins, J.R. , Ronk, J. , Schrag, J.A. , Rude, G.G. , & Stowitschek, C. (1994). Effects of using school-based participatory decision-making to improve services for low-performing students . Elementary School Journal, 94, 357— 372.

Johnson, J.R. , & Rusch, F.R. (1992). Educational reform and special education: Foundations for a national research agenda focused upon secondary education. Champaign: University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana, Transition Research Institute at Illinois.

Lincoln, Y.S. , & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

McGrew, K.S. , Algozzine, B. , Ysseldyke, J.E. , Thurlow, M.L. , & Spiegel, A. (1995). Including individuals with disabilities in national databases: Creating a failure to communicate. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 472— 487.

10.

Meyers, J. , Gelzheiser, L. , Yelich, G. , & Gallagher, M. (1990). Classroom, remedial and resource teachers' views of pullout programs. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 533—545.

11.

Miles, M.B. , & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

12.

National Commission on Excellence in Education. ( 1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform . Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

13.

National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1992). School reform: Opportunities for excellence and equity for individuals with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 276—280.

14.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).

15.

President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). New era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education

16.

Reynolds, M. , Wang, M. , & Walberg, H. (1987). The necessary restructuring of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 53, 391—398.

17.

Sapon-Sevin, M. (1987). The national education reports and special education: Implications for students. Exceptional Children, 53, 300—306.

18.

Schensul, J.J. , & LeCompte, M.D. (1999). Ethnographer's toolkit . Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press .

19.

Sizer, T.R. (1984). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin .

20.

Stainback, W. , & Stainback, S. (1984). A rationale for the merger of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 51, 102—111.

21.

Vanderwood, M. , McGrew, K.S. , & Ysseldyke, J.E. (1998). Why we can't say much about students with disabilities during educational reform. Exceptional Children, 64, 359—370.

22.

Vitello, S. J. , & Mithaug, D. E. (Eds.). (1998). Inclusive schooling: National and international perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

23.

Will, M. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411—415.

24.

Ysseldyke, J. , Algozzine, R. , & Thurlow, M. (1992). School reform and special education. In Critical issues in special education (pp. 139—168). Boston : Houghton Mifflin.