Economics and Adults Identified as Low-Functioning Deaf

Abstract

Individuals who read below second-grade level, achieve in school below fourth-grade level, or have secondary conditions in addition to deafness may be identified by state rehabilitation agency counselors or other professionals as having “low-functioning deafness” (LFD). There are an estimated 125,000 to 165,000 adults with LFD in the United States today. Most do not work, but they tend to be on federal and federal—state benefits programs, notably Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), Medicaid, and Medicare. SSI recipients typically also receive Medicaid benefits, whereas those on SSDI generally receive Medicare benefits. Federal spending on adults with LFD exceeds $1 billion/year. It would be less costly to the U.S. Treasury were such beneficiaries to be rehabilitated to work. Three national demonstration projects conducted during the 1990s showed that rehabilitating many adults with LFD is both feasible and cost effective. Nevertheless, few individuals with LFD are being provided with the services they require to become and remain employed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berkowitz, M. , Horning, M. , McConnell, S. , & Worrall, J. (1978). Rehabilitating Social Security Disability Insurance beneficiaries: The promise and the performance. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Bureau of Economic Research .

Bowe, F. G. (Ed.). (1988). Toward equality: Education of the deaf. Washington, DC : U.S. Government Printing Office.

Bowe, F.G. (2002). Enhancing reading ability to prevent students from becoming “low-functioning deaf” as adults. American Annals of the Deaf, 147(5), 22—27.

Bowe, F.G. (2003). Transition for deaf and hard of hearing students: A blue-print for change. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8, 484—492.

Carr, N. (1996). Final report: A community based vocational rehabilitation consortium for low functioning adults who are deaf. Unpublished manuscript. (Available from Lexington Center for the Deaf, 30th Avenue and 75th Street, Jackson Heights, NY 11370)

Dew, D. W. (Ed.) (1999). Servingindividuals who are low-functioning deaf: 25th Institute on Rehabilitation Issues. Washington, DC: George Washington University, Regional Rehabilitation Continuing Education Program.

Harmon, M.D. , & Levy, A. (1996). Final report: Community outreach program for the deaf. Unpublished manuscript. (Available from Catholic Community Services, 140 West Speedway, Suite 130, Tucson, AZ 85705)

The Peterson collection. (2004). Retrieved March 9, 2004, from http://www.rit.edu/~glk9638/history/

Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U. S. C. § 701 et seq.

10.

Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1992, 29 U. S. C. § 701 et seq.

11.

Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Employment Policy. (2004). Program on employment and disability . Retrieved March 9, 2004, from http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/ped/products.html

12.

Temporary Assistance to Needy Families Act of 1996, 42, U.S.C. § 601 et seq.

13.

Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999, 42 U.S.C. § 1305 et seq.

14.

Walter, G.G. , & Clarcq, J.R. (2000, April). Effect of postsecondary education on reducing SSI and SSDI payments to deaf and hard of hearing college graduates. Paper presented at the Postsecondary Education Network (PEP-Net) conference, Denver, CO. (Available from the National Technical Institute for the Deaf, 52 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623)

15.

Watson, L. , & Johnson, T. (1996). Continuation application for community-based projects for individuals who are low functioning and deaf or low functioning and hard of hearing. Unpublished manuscript. (Available from Southwest Center for the Hearing Impaired, 6487 Whitby Road, San Antonio, TX 78240)