State Rehabilitation Agencies,Aging with Disability,and Technology

Abstract

Recent federal and state laws have required state rehabilitation programs and Tech Act programs (TAPs) to improve the access of persons with disabilities to assistive technology (AT) and home modifications (HM). A national survey of all 81 state rehabilitation programs, conducted in 1997 and 1998, examined the extent to which state rehabilitation agencies provided services to middle age (51 years-64 years) and older (65 years and older) clients, agency staff awareness of the aging of the disability population, and agency capacity to provide access to AT/HM for persons with disabilities who are older. Findings indicated that agencies for the blind or visually impaired (BVIs) served significantly more middle age and older persons, were more aware of aging, and provided greater access to AT/HM than did rehabilitation agencies (RAs). In addition, RAs having TAPs within their agency were more aware of aging, provided more staff training on aging, and collected more data on middle age and older clients than did RAs without TAPs. These results point to the need for more counselor training in the areas of technology and aging, areas in which the TAPs and the network of agencies dealing with aging issues can play a major role. To meet the challenges of an aging population, rehabilitation agencies may also need a mandate that makes independent living a valued outcome in and of itself. Finally, agencies need more AT/HM funding so they can address the growing population of middle age and older persons with disabilities.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agree, E. (1999) The influence of personal care and assistive devices on the measurement of disability. Social Science & Medicine , 48, 427-443.

Agree, E. , & Freedman, V. (2000). Incorporating assistive devices into community-based long-term care: An analysis of the potential for substitution and supplementation . Journal of Aging and Health, 12, 426-450.

Campbell, M. , Sheets, D. , & Strong, P. (1999). Secondary health conditions among middle-aged individuals with chronic physical disabilities: Implications for unmet needs for services, Assistive Technology, 11, 105-122.

Coughlin, J.F. (1999). Technology needs of aging boomers. Issues in Science and Technology. Retrieved Oct. 26, 1999, from the World Wide Web: http://bob.nap.edu/issues/16.1/coughlin.htm

Dejong, G. , Batavia, A. , & Griss, R. ( 1989). America's neglected health minority: Working-age persons with disabilities. Milbank Quarterly, 67, 311-351.

Enders, A. (1995, Spring). The role of technology in the lives of older people. Generations, 19(1),7-9.

Flynn, C. (Ed.). (1994). Rehabilitation technology services in vocational rehabilitation agencies survey: General report of findings. West Columbia, SC: Center for Rehabilitation Technology Services, South Carolina Vocational Rehabilitation Department.

Gitlin, L. , Corcoran, M. , Winter, L. , Boyce, A. , & Hauck, W. (2001 ). A randomized controlled trial of a home environmental intervention: Effect on efficacy and upset in caregivers and on daily function of persons with dementia. Gerontologist, 41(1), 4-14.

Kahn, R. , Foner, A. , & Riley, M. (Eds.). (1994). Age and structural lag: Society's failure to provide meaningful opportunities in work, family and leisure. New York: Wiley.

10.

LaPlante, M.P. , Hendershot, G.E. , & Moss, A.J. (1992). Assistive technology devices and home accessibility features: Prevalence, payment, need, and trends. Advance Data , 217, 1-4.

11.

Liebig, P.S. , & Sheets, D.J. (1998). Ageism, disability and access to environmental interventions. Technology and Disability, 8, 69-84.

12.

Liebig, P.S. , & Sheets, D.J. (1999). State assistive technology policies and programs for older adults with disabilities: Trends and innovations. Technology and Disability, 10, 151-159.

13.

Mann, W.C. , Ottenbacker, K.J. , Fraas, L. , Tomita, M. , & Granger, C.V. (1999). Effectiveness of assistive technology and environmental interventions in maintaining independence and reducing home care costs for the frail elderly: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Family Medicine, 8, 210-217.

14.

Manton, K.G. , Corder, L. , & Stallard, E. (1993). Changes in the use of personal assistance and special equipment from 1982 to 1989: Results from the 1982 and 1989 NLTCS . Gerontologist, 33(2), 168-176.

15.

McNeil, J. (1997). Americans with disabilities: 1994-95. Census population reports: Household economic studies (Census Bureau Series No. P70-61). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

16.

National Coalition on Disability and Aging. ( 1995, March). The national summit on disability and aging: Keys to choice and self-determination. Washington, DC: Author.

17.

National Council on Disability. (1993). Study on the financing of assistive technology devices and services for individuals with disabilities. Washington, DC: United Cerebral Palsy Association.

18.

Olmstead v. L. C., 119 S. Ct. 2175 (1999).

19.

Patrick, D. , Richardson, M. , Starks, H. , & Rose, M. (1994). A framework for the health of people with disabilities . In D. J. Lollar (Ed.), Preventing secondary conditions associated with spina bifida or cerebral palsy-Proceedings and recommendations of a symposium. Washington, DC: Spina Bifida Association of America.

20.

Rehabilitation Services Administration. (2001 ). Basic vocational rehabilitation services. Retrieved December 3, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ed.gov/offices/OSERS/RSA/Programs/formula/bvrs.html

21.

Sheets, D.J. , Emerman, J. , & LaBuda, D. ( 1997). The aging network and the home modification needs of elders. Technology and Disability , 7, 165-173.

22.

Sheets, D.J. , Wray, L.A. , & Dejong, F. ( 1994). Incorporating independent living outcomes within rehabilitation agencies: Older disabled persons as an underserved population. Journal of Physical and Occupational Therapy, 12(4), 1-12.

23.

Sheets, D.J. , Wray, L.A. , & Torres-Gil, F.M. ( 1993). Geriatric rehabilitation: Linking aging, health, and disability policy. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 9(2), 1-17.

24.

U.S. General Accounting Office. (1993). Vocational rehabilitation: Evidence for federal program's effectiveness is mixed (GAO No. PEMD-93-19). Washington, DC: Author.

25.

Verbrugge, L.M. , Rennert, C. , & Madans, J.H. (1997). The great efficacy of personal and equipment assistance in reducing disability. American Journal of Public Health , 87, 384-392.

26.

Wilson, J.Q. (2000). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books .

27.

Zola, I. K. (1996). Living at home: The convergence of aging and disability . In S. Laspery and J. Hyde (Eds.), Staying put: Adapting the places instead of the people (pp. 25-39). Amityville, NY: Baywood.