Attitudes Toward Disabilities

Abstract

This research note explores the difficulties and importance of obtaining research data on attitudes of disability-rights activists. Remarkably little research has been done on the attitudes that people with disabilities have about their disabilities. This is especially interesting in light of the development and formation of the disability-rights movement and the minority-group perspective about disability. This article discusses the methodological and pragmatic complexities and concerns in obtaining data from people with disabilities who participated in Americans Disabled for Assistance Programs Today (ADAPT) social action events. ADAPT members are one of the groups most highly associated with identity politics of the disability-rights movement; they are also extremely mistrustful of outsiders who they fear may be interested in disrupting their activities. The authors discuss how sufficient trust and engagement was achieved to carry out this study without compromising sound research principles. Some findings are also reported. These results suggest that this group of people with disabilities identifies closely with their disabilities and seems to adhere to a minority-group perspective. Many identified so closely with their disabilities at a personal level that they indicated that they would not choose to be cured even if this were "magically" possible.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albrecht, G.L. , & Levy, J. (1981). Constructing disabilities as social problems. In G. L. Albrecht (Ed.), Cross national rehabilitation policies: A sociological perspective. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.

Anderson, R.M. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 1-10.

Barnartt, S.N. (1996). Disability culture or disability consciousness? Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 7(2), 1-17.

Beaulaurier, R.L. , & Taylor, S.H. (1999). Self determination and consumer control: Guiding principles in the empowerment model as utilized by disability rights movement . In W. Shera & L. Wells (Eds.), Empowerment practice: Developing richer conceptual foundations (pp. 159-177). Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.

Conway, M. (1991). Political participation in the United States. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.

Fellin, P. , Tripodi, T. , & Meyer, H.J. (1969). Exemplars of social research. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.

Fischer, J. , & Corcoran, K. (1994). Measures for clinical practice (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.

Hahn, H. (1984). Reconceptualizing disability: A political science perspective. Rehabilitation Literature, 45(11-12), 362-374.

10.

Hahn, H. (1997). An agenda for citizens with disabilities: Pursuing identity and empowerment. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation , 9(1), 3 1-37.

11.

Luhtanen, R. , & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 302-318.

12.

Luhtanen, R. , & Crocker, J. (1995). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity (long version). Unpublished manuscript, SUNY, Buffalo, NY.

13.

Miller, A. , Gurin, P. , Gurin, G. , & Malanack, O. (1981). Group consciousness and political participation . American Journal of Political Science, 25, 494-511.

14.

Morse, J.M. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 220-235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

15.

Patton, M.Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

16.

Phillips, M.J. (1985). Try harder: The experience of disability and the dilemma of normalization. The Social Science Journal, 22, 45-47

17.

Phinney, J.S. (1992). The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research , 7(2), 156-176.

18.

Schriner, K.F. (1998). Political empowerment: Introduction to special section on the political participation of people with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 9, 1-2.

19.

Schur, L.A. (1998). Disability and the psychology of political participation. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 9, 3-31.

20.

Schutt, R.K. (1999). Investigating the social world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.

21.

Scotch, R.K. (1989). Politics and policy in the history of the disability rights movement. Milbank Quarterly, 67(Suppl. 2, Pt. 2), 380-400.

22.

Shapiro, J. (1993). No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement. New York: Random House.

23.

Weinberg, N. (1988). Another perspective: Attitudes of people with disabilities. In H. E. Yucker (Ed.), Attitudes toward people with disabilities (pp. 141-153). New York: Springer.

24.

Weinberg, N. , & Williams, J. (1978). How the physically disabled perceive their disabilities . Journal of Rehabilitation, 44, 31-33.

25.

Zola, I.K. (1983). Developing new self-images and interdependence . In N. M. Crewe & I. K. Zola (Eds.), Independent living for physically disabled people (pp. 49-59). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.