A criminal defendant may not be tried unless competent and may not plead guilty or waive the right to counsel unless the waiver is voluntary, knowing, and intelligent. A competency inquiry centers on a defendant's rational and factual understanding of the charges and their consequences and present ability to assist counsel. Competency is not static, changing according to situation and function. In its 1993 ruling, Godinez v. Moran, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the standard for competency to waive counsel and plead guilty is no higher than competency to stand trial, resulting in a relaxed focus for competency determinations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Appelbaum, P.
, & Roth, L. (1982). Competency to consent to research: A psychiatric overview. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 951-958.
2.
Blackstone, W.
(1962). Commentaries on the laws of England. Boston: Beacon.
3.
Bonnie, R.
(1992). The competence of criminal defendants: A theoretical reformulation. Behavioral Science and Law, 10, 291-316.
4.
Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 (1975).
5.
6.
Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975).
7.
Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986).
8.
Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389 (1993).
9.
Lacy, C.
, et al. (Eds.) (1993). Drug Information Handbook. Hudson, OH: Lexi-Comp, Inc.
10.
Melton, G.
, Petrila, J., Poythress, N., & Slobogin, C. (1987). Psychological evaluations for the courts. New York: Guilford.
11.
Miller, K.
, & Radelet, M. (1993). Evaluating the mentally ill: The criminal justice system and the case of Alvin Ford. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Miller, R.
, & Kaplan, L. (1992). Representation by counsel: Right or obligation?Behavioral Science and Law, 10, 395-406.
13.
Moran v. Godinez, 972 F.2d 263 (9th Cir. 1992).
14.
Note
. (1963). The representation of indigent criminal defendants in the federal district court. Harvard Law Review, 76, 579-618.
15.
Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375 (1966).
16.
People v. Swallow, 60 Misc.2d 171, 301 N.Y.S.2d 798 (1969).
17.
Perlin, M.
(1994a). Law and mental disability. Charlottesville, VA: Michie.
18.
Perlin, M.
(1994b). Mental disability law: Civil and criminal, 3 (supplement). Charlottesville, VA: Michie.
Reisner, R.
, & Slobogin, C. (1990). Law and the mental health systems: Civil and criminal aspects (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West.
22.
Riggins v. Nevada, 504 U.S. 127 (1992).
23.
Smith, S.
(1993, August). The 1992-93 Supreme Court and psychologists. Bulletin of the American Academy of Forensic Psychology, 14, 3.
24.
State v. Slattery, 239 N.J. Super. 534, 571 A.2d 1314 (App. Div. 1990).
25.
Taub, S.
(1993, October 18). Competency standard clarified. National Law Journal, pp. 25-29.
26.
United States v. Charters, 829 F.2d 479 (1987), rev'd. 863 F.2d 302 (4th Cir. 1988).
27.
Vandenberg, G.
(1993). Court testimony in mental health: A guide for mental health professionals and attorneys. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
28.
Weiner, B.
(1985). Mental disability and the criminal law. In S. J. Brakel, J. Parry, & B. A. Weiner (Eds.), The mentally disabled and the law (3rd ed., pp. 693-801). Chicago: American Bar Foundation.
29.
Westbrook v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 150 (1966).
30.
Winick, B.
(1996). Incompetency to proceed in the criminal process: Past, present, and future. In B. Sales & D. Shuman (Eds.), Law, mental health, and mental disorder (pp. 310-340). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
