Andenaes, J. (1988). The Scandinavian Experience. In M. D. Laurence, J. R. Snortum , and F. E. Zimring (Eds), Social Control of the Drinking Driver (pp.43-63). Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
2.
California Department of Motor Vehicles (1991 ). Administrative Per Se Process Measures-First Twelve Months (July 1990-June 1991.
3.
Christin, D. (1993). Personal Communication. Ms. Christin is the supervisor of the Sacramento County Municipal Court DUI section.
4.
Donovan, D.M. (1989). Driving While Intoxicated: Different Roads to and from the Problem. Criminal Justice and behavior16:270-98.
5.
Heinzelman, F. (1985). Mandatory Confinement as a Response to Community Concerns About Drunk Driving. Justice System Journal, 10: 265-278.
6.
Kingsnorth, R. and Jungsten, M. (1988). Driving Under the Inluence: The Impact of Legislative Reform on Court Sentencing Practices. Crime and Delinquency , 34 (1):3-27.
7.
Kingsnorth, R., Barnes, C. and Coonley, P. (1989). Driving Under the Influence: The Impact of Legislative Reform on the Role of legal and Extralegal Variables in Court Sentencing Practices . Criminal Justice Policy Review3(4):344-59.
8.
Kingsnorth, R. (1991). The Gunther Special: Deterrence and the DUI Offender . Criminal Justice and Behavior18(3):251-66.
9.
Kingsnorth, R., Alvis, L. and Gavia, G. (1993). Specific Deterrence and the DUI offender: The Impact of a Decade of Reform. Justice Quarterly, 10(2):265-288.
10.
Nichols, J.L. and Ross, L.H.( 1989). The Effectiveness of Legal Sanctions in Dealing with Drinking Drivers. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving , 6: 33-60.
11.
Preusser, D., Blomberg, R., and Ulmer, R. (1988). Follow-Up Evaluation of Wisconsin's 1982 Drinking and Driving Law. Final Report on Contract DOT HS 807 377. Washington, D.C: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration .
12.
Rhea, C. (1993). Personal communication. Ms Rhea is Research Analyst in the California Department of Justice Law Enforcement Information Center .
13.
Ross, H.L., McCleary, R. and LaFree, G. (1990). Can Mandatory jail laws deter Drunk Driving: The Arizona Case. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology81: 156-170.
14.
Ross, H.L. and Foley, J.P. (1987). Judicial Disobedience of the Mandate to Imprison Drunk Drivers". Law and Society Review21(2): 315-323.
15.
Ross, H.L. (1988). Deterrence-based Policies in Britain, Canada, and Australia. In M. D. Laurence, J. R. Snortum, and F. E. Zimring (Eds), Social Control of the Drinking Driver (pp64-78). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Ross H.L. and Gonzales, P. (1988). The Effect of License Revocation on Drunk Driving Offenders. Accident Analysis and Prevention20: 379-91.
17.
Ross, H.L. (1991a). Administrative License revocation for Drunk Drivers: Options and Choices in Three States. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
18.
Ross, H.L. (1991b). Decriminalizing Drunk Driving: A Means to Effective Punishment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 24: 89-90.
19.
Ross,H.L.( 1991c).LicenseDeprivationasaDrunkDriverSanction. Alcohol.Drugs and Driving , 7: 63-69.
20.
Ross, H.L. (1992). Are DWI Sanctions Effective. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving , 8 (1):61-69.
21.
Stewart, K., Gruenewald, P.J. and Parker, R.N. (1992). Assessing Legal Change: Recidivism and Administrative Per Se Laws. Journal of Quantitative Criminology , 8: 375-394.
22.
Tashima, H. and Peck, R. (1986). An Evaluation of the California Drunk Driving Countermeasure System: Volume 3, An evaluation of the Specific Deterrent Effects of Alternative Sanctions for First and Repeat DUI Offenders. Sacamento, CA: Department of Motor Vehicles.
23.
West, (1990). California Penal Code. Section 13353.