This article examines the problems brought about by the disorganization of American police agencies. An argument is made that overconcern for local autonomy and the intentional fragmentation of the police system have resulted in a chaos which must be restructured into a logical order. The author discusses what other democratic nations have done to make their police systems more effective. Recommendations are then made for improving the police system in a manner consistent with American democratic principles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bayley, D.H. (1985). Patterns of policing: A comparative international analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
2.
Becker, H.K. (1980). Police systems of Europe (2nd ed.). Springfield: Charles Thomas .
3.
Berkley, G.E. (1976a). Europe and America: How the police work. In A. Niederhoffer & A. Blumberg (Eds.), The ambivalent force: Perspectives on the police (2nd ed.) (pp. 47-53). Hinsdale, Ill: Dryden Press,
4.
Berkley, G.E. (1976b). Centralization, democracy and the police. In J. Munroe (Ed.), Classes, conflict and control (pp. 425-430). Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing,
5.
Berkley, G.E. (1969). The democratic policeman. Boston: Beacon Press.
6.
Clawson, R.W., & Norrgard, D. (1970). National responses to urban crime: The Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In H. Hahn (Ed.), Police in urban society (pp. 71-93). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
7.
Drucker, P.F. (1974). Management: Tasks, responsibilities, practices . New York: Harper and Row Publishers .
Gamson, W.A., & Yuchtman, E. (1977). Police and society in Israel. In D. H. Bayley (Ed.), Police and society (pp. 195-218). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
11.
Grosman, B. (1985). Canada. In G. F. Cole, S. Frankowski, & M. G. Gertz (Eds.) Major criminal justice systems. Beverly Hills: Sage.
12.
Hunter, R.D. (1989). Amalgamation: Resolving the dilema of American police. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Washington, DC.
13.
Ingleton, R. (1979). Police of the world. London : Ian Allen.
14.
International Criminal Police Organization. ( 1987). Policing and justice in Europe. International Criminal Police Review,407, 2-17.
15.
Mark, J. (1976). Police organizations: The challenges and dilemmas of change. In A. Niederhoffer & A. Blumberg (Eds.), The ambivalent force: Perspectives on the police (2nd ed.) (pp. 356-365). Hinsdale, Ill.: Dryden Press,.
16.
McDowell, C.P. (1975). Police in the community. Cincinnati : Anderson Publishing.
17.
McIver, J.P., & Wagner, L. (1978). Police agency cooperation: Patterns of mutual aid and cross-deputization. In E. Ostrom, R. B. Parks, & G. P. Whitaker (Eds.), Patterns of municipal policing (pp. 301-324). Cambridge: Ballinger.
18.
Murphy, P.V. (1989). Foreward. In E. Delattre, Character and cops (pp. XIII-XV). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
19.
National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement. (1931). Report on the police. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20.
President's Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice. (1967a). Task force report: The police. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21.
President's Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice (1967b). The challenge of crime in a free society. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
22.
Sheehan, R., & Cordner, G.W. (1989). Introduction to police administration (2nd ed.). Cincinnati: Anderson.
23.
Smith, B. (1949). Police systems in the United States. New York: Harper Brothers.
24.
Stead, P.J. (1985). The police ofBritain. New York : Macmillan.
