The universe of cases in this study includes all persons charged and indicted for murder and convicted and incarcerated for murder (or a lesser included offense) in Kentucky between December 22, 1976 (the date of the current Kentucky capital punishment statute) and October 1, 1986 (N = 864; Adults = 830; Juveniles = 34). The purpose of this analysis was to compare the offense and victim characteristics of the adult und juvenile cases in the population. Our aim was to make a determination of the comparative "seriousness" of the cases. Put simply, "Did the juveniles commit more heinous homicides than adult offenders?" The findings indicate that the juvenile murder cases were more severe than the adult cases. However, juveniles were not sentenced to die at a higher rate than adults. The Kentucky experience may provide evidence that the public is unwilling to sentence juveniles to death even when the circumstances warrant such a penalty.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baldus, D.C., Pulaski, C., & Woodworth, G. (1983). Comparative review of death sentences: An empirical study of the Georgia experience. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 74, 661-753.
2.
Barnes, C.W., & Franz, R.S. (1989). Questionably adult: Determinants and effects of the juvenile waiver decision. Justice Quarterly, 6, 117-135.
3.
Bienin, L.B., Weiner, N.A., Denno, D.W., Allison, P.D., & Mills, D.L. (1988). The reimposition of capital punishment in New Jersey: The role of prosecutorial discretion. Rutgers Law Review, 41, 27-372.
4.
Bortner, M.A. (1986). Traditional rhetoric, organizational realities: Remand of juveniles to adult court. Crime and Delinquency , 32, 53-73.
5.
Bowers, W.J. (1984). Legal homicide: Death as punishment in America . Boston: Northeastern University Press.
6.
Cornell, D.G., Benedek, E.P., & Benedek, D.M. (1987). Characteristics of adolescents charged with homicide: Review of 72 cases. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 5, 11-23.
7.
Eddings v. Oklahoma (1982). 455 U.S. 104.
8.
Eigen, J.P. (1981). Punishing youth homicide offenders in Philadelphia . Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 72, 867-1924.
9.
Fagan, J.F., Forst, M., & Vivona, T.S. (1987). Racial determinants of the judicial transfer decision: Prosecuting violent youth in criminal court. Crime and Delinquency , 33, 259-286.
10.
Feld, B.C. (1983). Delinquent careers and criminal policy: Just deserts and the waiver decision. Criminology, 21, 195-212.
11.
Furman v. Georgia (1972). 408 U.S. 238.
12.
Greenberg, J. (1982). Capital punishment as a system. The Yale Law Journal, 91, 908-936.
13.
Gregg v. Georgia (1976). 428 U.S. 153.
14.
Gross, S.R., & Mauro, R. (1988). Death and discrimination. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
15.
Kent v. U.S (1966). 383 U.S. 541, 16 L.Ed. 2d 84, S. Ct. 1045.
16.
Lewis, D.O., Pincus, J.H., Bard, B., Richardson, E., Prichep, L.S., Feldman, M., & Yeager, C. (1988). Neuropsychiatric, psychoeducational, and family characteristics of 14 juveniles condemned to death in the United States. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 584-598.
17.
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. ( 1989). Death row, U.S.ANew York.
18.
Ogloff, J.R.P. (1987). The juvenile death penalty: A frustrated society's attempt at control. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 5, 447-455.
19.
McCleskey v. Kemp (1987). 107 S.Ct. 1756.
20.
Paternoster, R. (1983). Race of the victim and location of the crime: The decision to seek the death penalty in South Carolina. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 74, 754-785.
21.
Radelet, M.L. (1981). Racial characteristics and the imposition of the death penalty. American Sociological Review, 46, 918-927.
Rowley, J.C., Ewing, C.P., & Singer, S.I. (1987). Juvenile homicide: The need for an interdisciplinary approach. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 5, 1-10.
24.
Rudman, C., Hartstone, E. , Fagan, J., & Moore, M. (1986). Violent youth in adult court. Crime and Delinquency, 32, 75-96.
25.
Rush, GE (1986). Execute children? Almost never!Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Correctional Education Association, Cincinnati, OH.
26.
Skovron, S.E., Scott, J.E., & Cullen, F.T. (in press). The death penalty for juveniles: An assessment of public attitudes. Crime and Delinquency.
27.
Smith, M.D. (1987). Patterns of discrimination in assessments of the death penalty: The case of Louisiana. Journal of Criminal Justice, 15, 279-286.
28.
Stanford v. Kentucky (1989). 45 CrL 3203.
29.
Streib, V.L. (1987). Death penalty for juveniles. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
30.
Streib, V.L. (1988). Imposing the death penalty on children. In K.C. Haas and J.A. Inciardi (Eds.) Challenging capital punishment: Legal and social science approaches. (pp. 245-268). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Thomas, C.W., & Bilchik, S. (1985). Prosecuting juveniles in criminal courts: A legal and empirical analysis. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology , 76, 439-479.
32.
Thompson v. Oklahoma (1988). 101 L Ed 702.
33.
Tittle, C.R., & Curran, D.A. (1988). Contingencies for dispositional disparities in juvenile justice. Social Forces, 67, 23-58.
34.
U.S. Department of Justice (1989) The juvenile court's response to violent crime. Washington, D.C.: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention .
35.
U.S. Department of Justice. (1987). Teenage victims, 1983: A national crime survey report. Washington, D.C. : Bureau of Justice Statistics.
36.
Vito, G.F., & Keil, T.J. (1988). Capital sentencing in Kentucky: An analysis of the factors influencing decision making in the post-Gregg period. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 79, 483-503.
37.
Vito, G.F., & Wilson, D.G. (1985). The American juvenile justice system. Beverly Hills: Sage.
38.
Vito, G.F., & Wilson, D.G. (1988). Back from the dead: Tracking the progress of Kentucky's Furman-commuted death row population. Justice Quarterly, 5, 101-111.
39.
White, W.M. (1953). Case Comment: Eddings v. Oklahoma : A stay of execution for juveniles? New England Journal of Criminal and Civil Confinement, 9, 407-444.
40.
Wilkins v. Missouri (1988). 45 CrL 3203.
41.
Wolfson, A. (1989). Executing juveniles...State to argue death penalty before high court. Louisville Courier Journal, 26 (1) 14.
