China is reportedly the country that carries out the most executions worldwide, yet the lack of reliable data hinders the understanding of capital punishment in the Chinese Mainland. This study explores the role of guiding cases—judicial and prosecutorial decisions selected by China’s highest court and procuratorate to promote consistency and fairness—in the application of the death penalty. We first introduce guiding cases, their binding effects, and their significance, along with a description of the death penalty in China. We then present examples of how these cases can be analyzed to facilitate our understanding of the death penalty. This study constitutes the most comprehensive overview of guiding cases on capital punishment. It offers a unique perspective on studying capital punishment in China and encourages further research on the intersection of judicial and prosecutorial guidance and the death penalty.
ChenX.HuC. (2015). Guiding cases for China’s death penalty. In LiangB.LuH. (Eds.), The death penalty in China (pp. 187–213). Columbia University Press.
Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China (2023 Amendment). (2023).
8.
FangP. (2006). Sixing cuoan de lixing fenxi [A rational analysis of wrongful convictions in capital cases]. Xingshifa Pinglun, 18, 26.
9.
FuY.WangS. (2018). Xingshi zhidaoxing anli de xiaoli zhengcheng yu sifa shiyong [Justifications for the effects of criminal guiding cases and their applications]. Faxue, 9, 167–180.
10.
JiangS.HuM.LambertE. G. (2018). Predictors of death penalty views in China: An empirical comparison between college students and citizens. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(14), 4714–4735. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X18767573
11.
JiangS.LambertE. G.WangJ.SaitoT.PilotR. (2010). Death penalty views in China, Japan and the U.S.: An empirical comparison. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(5), 862–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.06.001
12.
LiY.LongmireD.LuH. (2018). Death penalty disposition in China: What matters?International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(1), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X16642426
13.
LiangB.LuH. (2015). The death penalty in China: Policy practice and reform. Columbia University Press.
14.
LuH.ShuaiH.LiY.LiuJ.LiangB. (2022). Confession and the crime control model: An analysis of exonerated death penalty cases in China. Asian Journal of Criminology, 17(S1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-022-09383-6
15.
MuL. (2014). Lun zhidoaxing anli de xiaoli [On the effects of guiding cases]. Dangdai Faxue, 1, 110–119.
16.
OberwittlerD.QiS. (2008). Public opinion on the death penalty in China. American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting, St Louis, Missouri.
17.
PengX. (2014). Zhuoding liangxing qingjie xianzhi sixing shiyong: Jiazhi, kongjian yu lujing [Extralegal factors restricting the death penalty: Values, space, and mechanisms]. Faxue, 9, 129–140.
SellinT. J. (1965). Capital punishment. Criminal Law Quarterly, 8(1), 36–51.
20.
SmithT. (2020). Body count politics: Quantification, secrecy, and capital punishment in China. Law & Social Inquiry, 45(3), 706–727. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2020.10
21.
SteffensmeierD.UlmerJ. T.KramerJ. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal justice sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763–798. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x
22.
SunG.LiuL. (2014). Sixing zhengce zai zhidaoxing anli zhong de shiyong fangshi [The application of death penalty policies in guiding cases]. Zhongguo Xingshifa Zazhi, 2, 33–37.
The Supreme People’s Court of China. (1999). Quanguo fayuan weihu nongcun wending xingshi shenpan gongzuo zuotanhui jiyao [Meeting summaries on adjudication to enhance the stability in rural community].
25.
The Supreme People’s Court of China. (2006). Guanyu tongyi xingshi sixing anjian hezhunquan youguan wenti de jueding [Decisions on the exclusive power to review death penalty cases].
26.
The Supreme People’s Court of China. (2010). Guanyu anli zhidao gongzuo de guiding [Regulations on guiding cases].
TrevaskesS. (2013). China’s death penalty: The Supreme People’s Court, the suspended death sentence and the politics of penal reform. British Journal of Criminology, 53(3), 482–499. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azt002
33.
UnneverJ. D.CullenF. T. (2005). Executing the innocent and support for capital punishment: Implications for public policy. Criminology & Public Policy, 4(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2005.00002.x
34.
WanC. (2018). Jiancha zhidao anli xiaoli yanjiu [On the effects of prosecutorial guiding cases]. Zhongguo Faxue, 2, 75–88.
WangL. (2023). Zhidaoxing anli shiyong ji wanshan yanjiu [On the application and improvement of guiding cases]. Shandong Faguan Peixun Xueyuan Xuebao, 4, 170–184.
37.
WangM. (2015). Sixing cuoan de leixing, yuanyin, yu fangzhi [Types of wrongful convictions in capital cases, their reasons, and preventions]. Zhongwai Faxue, 3, 566–569.
38.
XiongM.MiaoM. (2018). Miscarriages of justice in Chinese capital cases. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 41(3), 273–342.
39.
XuY. (2024). Woguo lici xingfa xiuzhengan zongshuping [A review of all previous criminal law amendments in China]. Zhongguo Falv Pinglun, 2, 178–197.
40.
ZhangH. (2018). Lun zhidao anli de canzhao xiaoli [On the effects of guiding cases]. Gansu Zhengfa Xueyuan Xuebao, 2, 119–135.
41.
ZhangX.LuoN.ZhengY. (2021). Xingshi jiancha zhidaoxing anli de juti yunyong [The applications of prosecutorial guiding cases]. Renmin Jiancha, 15, 53–55.
