Agency records and administrative data have been widely employed in the criminal justice discipline, particularly in cross-national comparisons. However, only a handful of studies in corrections have used such data to examine institutional trends and practices collectively within an Asian context. To address this research gap, this study analyzes three primary sources of agency records in Taiwan—Statistics of Justice, Crime Situations and Analyses, and Annual Reports—along with unpublished data approved by the Agency of Corrections. Through a systematic review, this study examines the evolution of institutional corrections over the past decade, with a focus on trends in general and special prison populations, release mechanisms, and key institutional provisions. In addition, it will explore the utility of agency documents in advancing evidence-based practices and facilitating cross-societal comparative studies. Hopefully, this study will inspire greater data transparency and applications that guide future research in corrections.
Alves da CostaF.VerschuurenM.AndersenY.Stürup-ToftS.Lopez-AcuñaD.Ferreira-BorgesC. (2022). The WHO prison health framework: A framework for assessment of prison health system performance. European Journal of Public Health, 32(4), 565–570. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac020
9.
AndersenL. H. (2024). Court delays and criminal recidivism: Results from Danish administrative data and a policy reform. Justice Quarterly, 41(5), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2023.2260451
10.
BontaJ.AndrewsD. A. (2023). The psychology of criminal conduct (7th ed.). Routledge.
11.
BosmaA. Q.van GinnekenE.PalmenH.PasmaA. J.BeijersbergenK. A.NieuwbeertaP. (2020). A new instrument to measure prison climate: The psychometric quality of the prison climate questionnaire. The Prison Journal, 100(3), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885520916819
ChenL.-A.ChengJ.-S.ChuJ.-C. (2019). Ensuring health equality for inmates at correctional institutions in Taiwan. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 118(8), 1175–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2019.04.019
16.
ChenY.-H.VîlcicăE. R.WardJ. T.MaynardM.EberhardtC.OlaghereA. (2024). Legitimacy of parole as a consequence of policy shock: The lived experiences of incarcerated persons during the parole moratorium in Pennsylvania, U.S. Law and Policy, 46(3), 246–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12239
17.
ConnellyR.PlayfordC. J.GayleV.DibbenC. (2016). The role of administrative data in the big data revolution in social science research. Social Science Research, 59, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.04.015
18.
Crime Prevention Research Center at the Academy for the Judiciary. (2018). The 2017 crime situations and analyses.
19.
Crime Prevention Research Center at the Academy for the Judiciary. (2023). The 2022 crime situations and analyses.
20.
Crime Prevention Research Center at the Academy for the Judiciary. (2024). The 2023 crime situations and analyses.
Department of Statistics. (2024). Annual report: 2023.
23.
DünkelF. (2016). Juvenile justice and human rights: European perspectives. In KuryH.RedoS.SheaE. (Eds.), Women and children as victims and offenders: Background, prevention, reintegration (pp. 681–719). Springer.
24.
Executive Yuan. (2011, December1). Rén quánzhǐ biāo [Human rights indicators]. Xíng zhèng yuàn rén quán zī xùn wǎng [Executive Yuan human rights information website]. https://www.ey.gov.tw/hrtj/32D90DF28F18CF93.
25.
HebentonB.JouS.ChangY.-C. (2010). Developing public safety and crime indicators in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Criminology, 5, 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-009-9081-8
26.
HsiehM.-L.SchwartzJ. (2018). Female violence and gender gap trends in Taiwan: Offender-behavioral changes or net-widening enforcement explanations?Feminist Criminology, 13(1), 28–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085115626798
27.
HsuH.-F. (2006). State power and penal rhetoric: A historical analysis of the prison system in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Criminology, 1(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-006-9005-9
HyattJ. M.AndersenS. N.van TiemB. (2024). Perceptions of incarcerated people: Prison conditions, public health, and justice in the United States. Journal of Public Health Policy, 45(3), 446–459. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-024-00496-z
30.
JenC.-C. (2022). Impacts and responses taken to mitigate COVID-19 in correctional facilities around the world. Journal of Corrections, 11, 3–36.
KuoS.-Y.ZhaoR. (2019). Prison misconduct among female inmates with metal disorders, substance abuse/dependence, and co-occurring disorders in Taiwan. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 43, 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2019.1566081
35.
LaiY.-L. (2013). The impact of correctional philosophies on prison architecture over the past century in Taiwan. Journal of Crime, Punishment and Corrections, 5, 52–71.
36.
LaiY.-L. (2017). The impact of individual and institutional factors on turnover intent among Taiwanese correctional staff. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(1), 100–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15589099
37.
LaiY.-L.FelixM. M. M.JenC.-C.LuoF.WuH.-C. (2025) . Suicidal ideation and its correlates among incarcerated persons in Taiwan. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 25(4), 747–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2024.2363809
38.
Laws and Regulations Database of The Republic of China. (2009). Act to implement the international covenant on civil and political rights and the international covenant on economic, social and cultural rights. https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=I0020028
LiL. (2024). The health issues and prison treatment policies of child-raising in prison. Angle Health Law Review, 89, 32–43.
47.
LuY.SteffensmeierD. (2023). Stability or change in age-crime relation in Taiwan, 1980–2019: Age-period-cohort assessment. Asian Journal of Criminology, 18, 433–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-023-09412-y
48.
MachadoN.AbreoL.PetkariE.& Pinto daCostaM. (2024). The relationship of social contacts with prisoners’ mental health: A systematic review. Public Health, 234, 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2024.06.013
49.
MacKenzieD. L.PoseyC. D.RapaportK. R. (1988). A theoretical revolution in corrections: Varied purposes for classification. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15(1), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854888015001010
MonW.-T. (2024). A research on the positioning of open prison and treatment of inmates. Journal of Corrections, 7, 35–75.
54.
MundtA. P.Cifuentes-GramajoP. A.BaranyiG.FazelS. (2024). Worldwide incidence of suicides in prison: A systematic review with meta-regression analyses. The Lancet Psychiatry, 11(7), 536–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00134-2
OlaghereA.ChenY.-H.KremerK. (2025). An opportunity for reform, transformation, or neither? Adapting the problem analysis triangle to carceral settings. Justice, Opportunities, and Rehabilitation, 64(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2024.2433276
PetersenB.Khalili-MahaniN.MurphyC.SawchukK.PhillipsN.LiK. Z. H.HebblethwaiteS. (2023). The association between information and communication technologies, loneliness and social connectedness: A scoping review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1063146
SteffensmeierD.SlepickaJ.SebeeloT.UhlJ. (2024). Age and the distribution for crime in Botswana, Africa: Comparisons with the USA, Taiwan, South Korea, Namibia, and HG invariance norm. Asian Journal of Criminology, 19, 617–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-024-09446-w
62.
SunY.-F. (2011). The transitions of juvenile correction facilities in Taiwan: Evidence from Chin-Chen Correction School archives [Master’s thesis, National Taipei University]. National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertation in Taiwan. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/w2gh6v
63.
Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty. (2024). Tái wān sǐ xíng xiàn kuàng [Current status of the death penalty in Taiwan]. https://www.taedp.org.tw/discussion/10073
64.
TsaiI.-C.WuY.-T. (2019). Recent analysis on crime trends and observations on policy development in Taiwan. Criminal Policies and Crime Prevention, 23, 4–20. https://doi.org/10.6460/CPCP.201912_(23).01
65.
TsaiP.-H.WangY.-W.YehH.-J. (2021). An evaluation model for the development of more humane correctional institutions: Evidence from Penghu Prison. Evaluation and Program Planning, 89, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102013
66.
TzengS. (2013). Applying DEMATEL to investigate the relationship between factors affecting parole boards’ decision-making in Taiwan. The Prison Journal, 94, 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885513512096
67.
United Nations. (Ed.) (2012). Human rights indicators: A guide to measurement and implementation. United Nations Human Rights, Office of the High Commissioner.
VîlcicăE. R. (2015). The influence of inmate visitation on the decision to grant parole: An exploratory study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(6), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.11.003
