This project sought to understand the present-day experiences of individuals housed in prisons by utilizing Participatory Action Research (PAR) methods that partnered a university research team with individuals incarcerated in an urban correctional facility. The team assessed perceptions of the current environment by surveying people incarcerated in an urban prison. This article discusses the role of PAR methodologies from project initiation to finalization, explicitly focusing on coordination with prison and Department of Correction (DOC) administrative leadership and the value of including incarcerated individuals on the research team for successful change. Throughout the process, the team identified areas for improvement and innovations to improve the prison environment. This article provides a road map, lessons learned from conducting PAR in prison environments, and the power of partnering researchers and members of the researched population on one collaborative research team.
AELE Mo. L. J. 301. (2013). Jail & Prisoner Law Section—An update on jail strip searches of general population detainees.
2.
BaldwinA.HarveyC.WoodE.BloiceD.WillisE. (2021). Correctional officers as participants: Action research in prisons. Action Research, 19(3), 574–587.
3.
BalfourG. (2018). Searching prison cells and prisoner bodies: Redacting carceral power and glimpsing gendered resistance in women’s prisons. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(2), 139–155.
4.
BaumF.MacDougallC.SmithD. (2006). Participatory action research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(10), 854.
5.
BordaO. F.ReasonP.BradburyH. (2006). Participatory (action) research in social theory: Origins and challenges. In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 27–37). Sage.
6.
CherniackM.BergerS.NamaziS.HenningR.PunnettL., & CPH-NEW Research Team. (2019). A participatory action research approach to mental health interventions among corrections officers: standardizing priorities and maintaining design autonomy. Occupational health science, 3, 387–407.
7.
CrabtreeJ. L.WallJ. M.OhmD. (2016). Critical reflections on participatory action research in a prison setting: Toward occupational justice. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 36(4), 244–252.
8.
CreweB. (2012). Prison culture and the prisoner society. In The prisoner (pp. 27-39). Routledge.
DemarestM.O’ConnellD.ChambersD.VisherC. (2023). Participatory action research in a pandemic: Prison climates during Covid-19. Crime and Social Control in Pandemic Times, 28, 257–271.
14.
DupontI. (2008). Beyond doing no harm: A call for participatory action research with marginalized populations in criminological research. Critical Criminology, 16(3), 197–207.
15.
FineM.TorreM. E.BoudinK.BowenI.ClarkJ.HyltonD.UpeguiD. (2001). Changing minds: The impact of college in a maximum security prison. Effects on Women in Prison, the Prison Environment, Reincarceration Rates and Post-Release Outcomes.
16.
FineM.TorreM. E. (2004). Re-membering exclusions: Participatory action research in public institutions. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(1), 15–37.
17.
FineM.TorreM. E. (2006). Intimate details: Participatory action research in prison. Action Research, 4(3), 253–269.
18.
FineM.TorreM. E. (2019). Critical participatory action research: A feminist project for validity and solidarity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(4), 433–444.
19.
FineM.TorreM. E.BoudinK.BowenI.ClarkJ.HyltonD.MartinezM.Missy, RobertsR. A.SmartP.UpeguiD. (2003). Participatory action research: From within and beyond prison bars. The Prison Journal, 89(1), 21–45.
20.
HaverkateD. L.MeyersT. J.TelepC. W.WrightK. A. (2020). On PAR with the yard: Participatory action research to advance knowledge in corrections. Corrections, 5(1), 28–43.
21.
HaymanJ.SonnichsenC.NaamaraW.OcholaP. (1996, July). Comparative experience with worksite prevention programmes in Africa: Zimbabwe, Tanzania, and Kenya [Conference session]. Eleventh International Conference on AIDS, Vancouver, Canada, p. 246.
22.
HillR. P.RappJ. M.CapellaM. L. (2015). Consumption restriction in a total control institution: Participatory action research in a maximum security prison. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 34(2), 156–172.
23.
JewkesY. (2012). Autoethnography and emotion as intellectual resources: Doing prison research differently. Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 63–75.
24.
LewinK. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46.
25.
MacGregorD. L. (2002). Stripped of All Reason-The Appropriate Standard for Evaluating Strip Searches of Arrestees and Pretrial Detainees in Correctional Facilities. Colum. JL & Soc. Probs., 36, 163.
26.
MagnusonS.KrasK. R.AleandroH.RudesD. S.TaxmanF. S. (2020). Using plan-do-study-act and participatory action research to improve use of risk needs assessments. Corrections, 5(1), 44–63.
27.
MarquartJ. W. (1986). Prison guards and the use of physical coercion as a mechanism of prisoner control. Criminology, 24(2), 347–366.
28.
McCullochJ.GeorgeA. (2023). Naked power: Strip searching in women’s prisons. In ScratonP.McCullochJ. (Eds.), The violence of incarceration (pp. 107–123). Routledge.
29.
MinklerM. (2000). Using participatory action research to build healthy communities. Public Health Reports, 115(2–3), 191–197.
30.
MitchellC.SmithA.LarkinJ. (2001) HIV/AIDS and gender-based violence: Who has the power? A Challenge for School Management in South African Schools. Montreal: Canada South Africa Education Management Programme.
31.
PayneY. A. (2017). Participatory action research. In TurnerB. S.Kyung-SupC.EpsteinC. F.KivistoP.OuthwaiteW.Michael RyanJ. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social theory (pp. 1–15). Wiley-Blackwell.
32.
PayneY. A.BryantA. (2018). Street participatory action research in prison: A methodology to challenge privilege and power in correctional facilities. The Prison Journal, 98(4), 449–469.
ReiterK. (2014). Making windows in walls: Strategies for prison research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(4), 417–428.
35.
RhodesS. D.MalowR. M.JollyC. (2010). Community-based participatory research: A new and not-so-new approach to HIV/AIDS prevention, care, and treatment. AIDS Education and Prevention, 22(3), 173–183.
36.
RudesD. S.MagnusonS.ShawC.SmithL.Kushmerick-McCuneB.HartwellT. N.AppletonC. J. (2023). Recognizing and remedying: Reflexive and centering approaches to engaging in research with individuals in carceral settings. In RudesD.ArmstrongG.KrasK.CarterT. (Eds.), Handbook on prisons and jails (pp. 399–408). Routledge.
37.
RudesD. S.ViglioneJ.LerchJ.PorterC.TaxmanF. S. (2014). Build to sustain: Collaborative partnerships between university researchers and criminal justice practitioners. Criminal Justice Studies, 27(3), 249–263.
38.
SchlangerM. (2008). Jail strip-search cases: Patterns and participants. Law and Contemporary Problems, 71(2), 65–88.
39.
SouryalS. (2009). Deterring corruption by prison personnel: A principle-based perspective. The Prison Jail, 89(1), 21–45.
40.
SullivanE.HassalP.RowlandsD. (2008). Breaking the chain: A prison-based participatory action research project. The British Journal of Forensic Practice, 10(3), 13–19.
41.
TorreM. E.FineM.StoudtB. G.FoxM. (2012). Critical participatory action research as public science. In CooperH.CamicP. M.LongD. L.PanterA. T.RindskopfD.SherK. J. (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 171–184). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-011
42.
WacquantL. (2002). The curious eclipse of prison ethnography in the age of mass incarceration. Ethnography, 3, 371–398.
43.
WardJ.BaileyD. (2012). Consent, confidentiality and the ethics of PAR in the context of prison research. In LoveK. (Ed.), Ethics in social research (Vol. 12, pp. 149–169). Emerald Group.
44.
WorleyR. M.CheesemanK. A. (2006). Guards as embezzlers: The consequences of “non-shareable problems” in prison settings. Deviant Behavior, 27(2), 203–222.
