Private security personnel play an important but largely overlooked role in the operation of closed-circuit television (CCTV) surveillance to prevent crime in public and private areas. This role can take a number of forms, including active monitoring of cameras. Drawing upon a global database of CCTV evaluations (N = 165), this article examines the function and performance of private security personnel as related to the effectiveness of CCTV. Findings indicate that CCTV schemes operated by private security personnel generated larger crime prevention effects than those operated by police or those using a mix of police and security personnel. Policy and research implications are discussed.
BragaA. A.WeisburdD. L.TurchanB. (2018). Focused deterrence strategies and crime control: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Criminology & Public Policy, 17, 205–250.
2.
CornishD. B.ClarkeR. V. (2003). Opportunities, precipitators, and criminal decisions: A reply to Wortley’s critique of situational crime prevention. In SmithM. J.CornishD. B. (Eds.), Theory for practice in situational crime prevention (pp. 41–96). Criminal Justice Press.
3.
DuvalS. (2005). The “trim and fill” method. In RothsteinH.SuttonA.BornsteinM. (Eds.), Publication bias in meta-analysis (pp. 127–144). Wiley.
4.
GillM.SpriggsA. (2005). Assessing the impact of CCTV (Home Office Research Study, No. 292). Home Office.
5.
GooldB. J. (2004). CCTV and policing. Oxford University Press.
6.
La VigneN. G.LowryS. S.MarkmanJ. A.DwyerA. M. (2011). Evaluating the use of public surveillance cameras for crime control and prevention. Urban Institute.
7.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Sage.
8.
NorrisC. (2003). From personal to digital: CCTV, the panopticon, and the technological mediation of suspicion and social control. In LyonD. (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting (pp. 249–281). Routledge.
9.
PizaE. L.CaplanJ. M.KennedyL. W. (2014). Is the punishment more certain? An analysis of CCTV detections and enforcement. Justice Quarterly, 31, 1015–1043.
10.
PizaE. L.CaplanJ. M.KennedyL. W.GilchristA. M. (2015). The effects of merging proactive CCTV monitoring with directed police patrol: A randomized control trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 43–69.
11.
PizaE. L.WelshB. C.FarringtonD. P.ThomasA. L. (2019). CCTV surveillance for crime prevention: A 40-year systematic review with meta-analysis. Criminology & Public Policy, 18, 135–159.
12.
ThompsonS. G.HigginsP. T. (2002). How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1559–1573.
13.
WaszkiewiczP. (2013). How effective is the public video surveillance system in Warsaw? In BjorklundF.SvenoniusO. (Eds.), Video surveillance and social control in a comparative perspective (pp. 153–170). Routledge.
14.
WeisburdD.MajmundarM. K. (Eds.). (2018). Proactive policing. National Academies Press.
15.
WelshB. C.FarringtonD. P. (2009). Public area CCTV and crime prevention: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 26, 716–745.
16.
WelshB. C.MudgeM. E.FarringtonD. P. (2010). Reconceptualizing public area surveillance and crime prevention: Security guards, place managers, and defensible space. Security Journal, 23, 299–319.
17.
WilsonD. (2005). Behind the cameras: Monitoring and open-street CCTV surveillance in Australia. Security Journal, 18, 43–54.
