General Strain Theory (GST) identifies victimization as one of the strains most strongly related to crime which, like other sources of strain, is moderated by individual and social factors. Recently, Agnew extended the theorization of coping strategies by proposing that the effects of strain on deviance are conditioned by individual and social factors in combination, rather than singly, which he labeled crime propensity. Tests of the propensity hypothesis have so far yielded mixed results, highlighting the value of additional studies. Whereas previous tests have focused on single countries, either in North America or Asia, we test the propensity hypothesis using data on adolescents in 25 countries collected through the International Self-Report Delinquency Study (ISRD3; n = 57,760). A series of ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions show that the relationship between victimization and delinquency/substance use is conditioned by the effects of individuals’ crime propensity, thereby supporting the recent extension to GST.
AgnewR. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47-88.
2.
AgnewR. (2001). Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 38, 319-361.
3.
AgnewR. (2007). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
AgnewR. (2013). When criminal coping is likely: An extension of general strain theory. Deviant Behavior, 34, 653-670.
5.
AgnewR. (2015). Using general strain theory to explain crime in Asian societies. Asian Journal of Criminology, 10, 131-147.
6.
AgnewR.WhiteH. R. (1992). An empirical test of general strain theory. Criminology, 30, 475-500.
7.
AikenL. S.WestS. G.RenoR. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
AseltineR. H.Jr.GoreS.GordonJ. (2000). Life stress, anger and anxiety, and delinquency: An empirical test of general strain theory. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 256-275.
9.
BaronS. W. (2009). Street youths’ violent responses to violent personal, vicarious, and anticipated strain. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 442-451.
10.
BaronS. W. (2019a). Police strain, negative emotions, criminal propensity, and criminal coping. American Journal of Criminal Justice. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s12103-019-9471-0
11.
BaronS. W. (2019b). Strain, criminal propensity, and violence: Examining the role of the composite moderator in Agnew’s extension to GST. Crime & Delinquency, 65, 801-821.
12.
BaronS. W.HartnagelT. F. (2002). Street youth and labor market strain. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 519-533.
13.
BotchkovarE. V.TittleC. R.AntonaccioO. (2009). General strain theory: Additional evidence using cross-cultural data. Criminology, 47, 131-176.
14.
CloggC. C.PetkovaE.HaritouA. (1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1261-1293.
15.
CraigJ. M.CardwellS. M.PiqueroA. R. (2017). The effects of criminal propensity and strain on later offending. Crime & Delinquency, 63, 1655-1681.
16.
EnzmannD.KivivuoriJ.MarshallI. H.SteketeeM.HoughM.KilliasM. (2018). A global perspective on young people as offenders and victims: First results from the ISRD3 Study. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
17.
GottfredsonM.HirschiT. (1987). The methodological adequacy of longitudinal research on crime. Criminology, 25, 581-614.
18.
GrasmickH. G.TittleC. R.BursikR. J.Jr.ArneklevB. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
19.
GujaratiD. N. (2003). Basic econometrics. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
20.
HayC.EvansM. M. (2006). Violent victimization and involvement in delinquency: Examining predictions from general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 261-274.
21.
HigginsG. E.JenningsW. G.TewksburyR.GibsonC. L. (2009). Exploring the link between low self-control and violent victimization trajectories in adolescents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 1070-1084.
22.
HirschiT.GottfredsonM. R. (1995). Control theory and the life-course perspective. Studies on Crime & Crime Prevention, 4, 131-142.
23.
HoffmannJ. P.MillerA. S. (1998). A latent variable analysis of general strain theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 83-110.
24.
InglehartR.BakerW. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19-51.
25.
JangS. J.SongJ. (2015). A “rough test” of a delinquent coping process model of general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 419-430.
26.
JenningsW. G.PiqueroA. R.ReingleJ. M. (2012). On the overlap between victimization and offending: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 16-26.
27.
Kort-ButlerL. A. (2010). Experienced and vicarious victimization: Do social support and self-esteem prevent delinquent responses?Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 496-505.
28.
LinW. H.MieczkowskiT. (2011). Subjective strains, conditioning factors, and juvenile delinquency: General strain theory in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Criminology, 6, 69-87.
29.
LockwoodD. (1997). Violence among middle school and high school students: Analysis and implications for prevention. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
30.
LuckenbillD. F. (1977). Criminal homicide as a situated transaction. Social Problems, 25, 176-186.
31.
ManasseM. E.GanemN. M. (2009). Victimization as a cause of delinquency: The role of depression and gender. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 371-378.
32.
ManzoniP.SchwarzeneggerC. (2018). The influence of earlier parental violence on juvenile delinquency: The role of social bonds, self-control, delinquent peer association and moral values as mediators. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10610-018-9392-3
33.
MazerolleP.MaahsJ. (2000). General strain and delinquency: An alternative examination of conditioning influences. Justice Quarterly, 17, 753-778.
34.
MazerolleP.PiqueroA. R. (1997). Violent responses to situations of strain: A structural examination. Justice Quarterly, 15, 65-91.
35.
MoonB.HaysK.BlurtonD. (2009). General strain theory, key strains, and deviance. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 98-106.
36.
MoonB.MorashM. (2017). A test of general strain theory in South Korea: A focus on objective/subjective strains, negative emotions, and composite conditioning factors. Crime & Delinquency, 63, 731-756.
37.
NäsiM.AaltonenM.KivivuoriJ. (2016). Youth hate crime offending: The role of strain, social control and self-control theories. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 17, 177-184.
38.
OsgoodD. W.WilsonJ. K.O’MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.JohnstonL. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61, 635-655.
39.
OuseyG. C.WilcoxP.SchreckC. J. (2015). Violent victimization, confluence of risks and the nature of criminal behavior: Testing main and interactive effects from Agnew’s extension of General Strain Theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 164-173.
40.
PaternosterR.BrameR.MazerolleP.PiqueroA. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859-866.
41.
PaternosterR.MazerolleP. (1994). General strain theory and delinquency: A replication and extension. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 31, 235-263.
42.
PosickC. (2013). The overlap between offending and victimization among adolescents: Results from the second international self-report delinquency study. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 29, 106-124.
43.
PosickC.GouldL. A. (2015). On the general relationship between victimization and offending: Examining cultural contingencies. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 195-204.
44.
PosickC.RocqueM. (2015). Family matters: A cross-national examination of family bonding and victimization. European Journal of Criminology, 12, 51-69.
45.
SchreckC. J.StewartE. A.OsgoodD. W. (2008). A reappraisal of the overlap of violent offenders and victims. Criminology, 46, 871-906.
46.
Serrano-MaílloA. (2018). Crime contemplation and self-control: A test of Situational Action Theory’s hypothesis about their interaction in crime causation. European Journal of Criminology, 15, 93-110.
47.
SigfusdottirI. D.KristjanssonA. L.AgnewR. (2012). A comparative analysis of general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 117-127.
SweetenG.PiqueroA. R.SteinbergL. (2013). Age and the explanation of crime, revisited. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 921-938.
50.
ThaxtonS.AgnewR. (2018). When criminal coping is likely: An examination of conditioning effects in general strain theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34, 887-920.
51.
TuranovicJ. J.PrattT. C. (2013). The consequences of maladaptive coping: Integrating general strain and self-control theories to specify a causal pathway between victimization and offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 29, 321-345.
52.
WikströmP.-O. (2010). Explaining crime as moral actions. In HitlinS.VaiseyS. (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of morality (pp. 211-239). New York, NY: Springer.
53.
WikströmP.-O.OberwittlerD.TreiberK.HardieB. (2012). Breaking rules: The social and situational dynamics of young people’s urban crime. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
54.
WillitsD. (2019). Violent propensity, strain, and violent intentions: A test of Agnew’s revised conditioning hypothesis. Deviant Behavior, 40, 122-137.
