Informal social control at micro-level places such as addresses, collections of addresses, and streetblocks is a critical factor in understanding crime patterns. Historically, informal social control has been associated with community-level theories such as social disorganization, systemic theory, and collective efficacy. This article reviews several important streams of literature that address the role of informal social control in controlling crime at micro-level places. It begins with opportunity theories such as rational choice, routine activity, and crime pattern theories, which mention informal social control as playing a role in crime control. More detailed treatment of the role of informal social control is offered by theoretical work addressing “eyes on the street” and human territorial functioning. Together, these various theoretical perspectives provide the basis for the specification of mechanisms that reflect how informal social control can prevent crime events. The article explains each theory, discusses the spatial scale at which the dynamics operate, highlights gaps in the current body of knowledge, and proposes a two-pronged research path forward.
AppleyardD. (1981). Livable streets. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
AppleyardD.LintellM. (1972). The environmental quality of city streets: The residents’ viewpoint. Journal of the American Planning Association, 38, 84-101.
3.
BarkerR. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
BarkerR. G. (1987). Prospecting in environmental psychology: Oskaloosa revisited. In StokelsD.AltmanI. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 1413-1432). New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
5.
BaumA.AielloJ. R.CalesnickL. E. (1978). Crowding and personal control: Social density and the development of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1000-1011.
6.
BerryB. J. L.KasardaJ. D. (1977). Contemporary urban ecology. New York, NY: Macmillan.
7.
BragaA. A.ClarkeR. V. (2014). Explaining high-risk concentrations of crime in the city: Social disorganization, crime opportunities, and important next steps. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 51, 480-498. doi:10.1177/0022427814521217
8.
BrantinghamP. J.BrantinghamP. L. (1984). Patterns in crime. New York, NY: Macmillan.
9.
BrantinghamP. J.BrantinghamP. L. (1991). Introduction to the 1991 reissue: Notes on environmental criminology. In BrantinghamP. J.BrantinghamP. L. (Eds.), Environmental criminology (pp. 1-6). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
10.
BrantinghamP. L.BrantinghamP. J. (1995). Criminality of place: Crime generators and crime attractors. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3, 5-26.
11.
BrownB. B.PerkinsD. D.BrownG. (2004). Incivilities, place attachment and crime: Block and individual effects. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 359-371.
12.
BrowningC. R.JacksonA. L. (2013). The social ecology of public space: Active streets and violent crime in urban neighborhoods. Criminology, 51, 1009-1043. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12026.
13.
BruchE. E.MareR. D. (2006). Neighborhood choice and neighborhood change. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 667-709. doi:10.1086/507856.
14.
BursikR. J.Jr. (2000). The systemic theory of neighborhood crime rates. In SimpsonS. S. (Ed.), Of crime and criminality: The use of theory in everyday life (pp. 87-108). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
BursikR. J.Jr.GrasmickH. G. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. New York, NY: Lexington Books.
16.
ClarkeR. V.CornishD. B. (1985). Modeling offender’s decisions: A framework for research and policy. In TonryM.MorrisN. (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 6, pp. 23-42). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
18.
EbbesenE. B.KjosG. L.KonečniV. J. (1976). Spatial ecology: Its effects on the choice of friends and enemies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 505-518.
19.
EckJ. E. (1995). A general model of the geography of illicit retail marketplaces. In EckJ. E.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Crime and place: Crime prevention studies (Vol. 4, pp. 67-93). Monsey, NY: WillowTree Press.
FelsonM. (1995). Those who discourage crime. In EckJ. E.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Crime and place: Crime prevention studies (Vol. 4, pp. 53-66). Monsey, NY: WillowTree Press.
23.
GilbertN.TroitzschK. G. (2005). Simulation for the social scientist (2nd ed.). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
24.
GrannovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
25.
GreenbergS. W.RoheW. M.WilliamsJ. R. (1981). Safe and secure neighborhoods: Physical characteristics and informal territorial control in high and low crime neighborhoods (Final Report). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
26.
GroffE. R. (2007). Simulation for theory testing and experimentation: An example using routine activity theory and street robbery. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 75-103.
27.
GroffE. R. (2008). Adding the temporal and spatial aspects of routine activities: A further test of routine activity theory. Security Journal, 21, 95-116.
28.
GroffE. R.WeisburdD.MorrisN. A. (2009). Where the action is at places: Examining spatio-temporal patterns of juvenile crime at places using trajectory analysis and GIS. In WeisburdD.BernascoW.BruinsmaG. (Eds.), Putting crime in its place: Units of analysis in spatial crime research (pp. 60-86). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
29.
GroffE. R.WeisburdD.YangS.-M. (2010). Is it important to examine crime trends at a local “micro” level? A longitudinal analysis of street to street variability in crime trajectories. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 7-32.
30.
HippJ. R. (2007). Block, tract, and levels of aggregation: Neighborhood structure and crime and disorder as a case in point. American Sociological Review, 72, 659-680.
31.
HunterA. J. (1985). Private, parochial and public social orders: The problem of crime and incivility in urban communities. In SuttlesG. F.ZaldM. N. (Eds.), The challenge of social control: Citizenship and institution building in modern society (pp. 230-242). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
32.
JacobsJ. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
33.
JacobsJ. (1968). Community on the city streets. In BaltzellE. D. (Ed.), The search for community in modern America (pp. 74-93). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
34.
JanowitzM. (1975). Sociological theory and social control. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 82-108.
35.
KellerS. (1968). The urban neighborhood: A sociological perspective. New York, NY: Random House.
36.
KornhouserR. (1978). Social sources of delinquency: An appraisal of analytic models. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
KurtzE. M.KoonsB. A.TaylorR. B. (1998). Land use, physical deterioration, resident-based control, and calls for service on urban streetblocks. Justice Quarterly, 15, 121-149.
38.
MannP. H. (1954). The concept of neighborliness. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 163-168.
39.
McKenzieR. D. (1970). The neighborhood: A study of local life in the city of Columbus. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1923)
40.
MerryS. E. (1981). Defensible space undefended: Social factors in crime control through environmental design. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 16, 397-422.
41.
NahemowL.LawtonM. P. (1975). Similarity and propinquity in friendship formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 205-213.
42.
PerkinsD. D.FlorinP.RichR. C.WandermanA.ChavisD. M. (1992). Participation and the social and physical environment of residential blocks: Crime and community context. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 83-115.
43.
PerkinsD. D.MeeksJ. W.TaylorR. B. (1992). The physical environment of street blocks and resident perceptions of crime and disorder: Implications for theory and measurement. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 21-34. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80294-4
44.
ReissA. J.Jr. (1951). Delinquency as the failure of personal and social controls. American Sociological Review, 16, 196-207.
45.
ReynaldD. M. (2011). Factors associated with the guardianship of places: Assessing the relative importance of the spatio-physical and sociodemographic contexts in generating opportunities for capable guardianship. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 48, 110-142. doi:10.1177/0022427810384138
46.
RobertsD.TaylorR. B.GarciaR. M.PerenzinA. (2014). Intra-streetblock ordered segmentation in a high crime urban neighborhood. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 31(2), 143-162.
47.
SampsonR. J.MorenoffJ. D.Gannon-RowleyT. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443-478.
48.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
49.
ShawC. R.McKayH. D. (1969). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1942)
50.
SuttlesG. D. (1972). The social construction of communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51.
TaylorR. B. (1987). Toward an environmental psychology of disorder: Delinquency, crime, and fear of crime. In StokelsD.AltmanI. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 951-986). New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
52.
TaylorR. B. (1988). Human territorial functioning: An empirical, evolutional perspective on individual and small group territorial cognitions, behaviors and consequences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
53.
TaylorR. B. (1997). Social order and disorder of street blocks and neighborhoods: Ecology, microecology, and the systemic model of social disorganization. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 34, 113-155.
54.
TaylorR. B. (1998). Crime and small-scale places: What we know, what we can prevent, and what else we need to know. In TaylorR. B.. (Eds.), Crime and Place: Plenary Papers of the 1997 Conference on Criminal Justice Research and Evaluation (pp. 1-22). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
55.
TaylorR. B. (2002). Fear of crime, social ties, and collective efficacy: Maybe masquerading measurement, maybe déjà vu all over again. Justice Quarterly, 19, 773-792.
56.
TaylorR. B. (2015). Community criminology: Four fundamentals. New York: New York University Press.
57.
TaylorR. B.GottfredsonS. D.BrowerS. (1984). Block crime and fear: Defensible space, local social ties, and territorial functioning. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 21, 303-331.
58.
TaylorR. B.KoonsB. A.KurtzE. M.GreeneJ. R.PerkinsD. D. (1995). Street blocks with more nonresidential land use have more physical deterioration: Evidence from Baltimore and Philadelphia. Urban Affairs Review, 31, 120-136.
59.
TaylorR. B.StoughR. R. (1978). Territorial cognition: Assessing Altman’s typology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 418-423.
60.
TobyJ. (1957). Social disorganization and stake in conformity: Complementary factors in the predatory behavior of hoodlums. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 48, 12-17.
61.
WeisburdD.BruinsmaG.BernascoW. (2009). Units of analysis in geographic criminology: Historical development, critical issues and open questions. In WeisburdD.BernascoW.BruinsmaG. (Eds.), Putting crime in its place: Units of analysis in spatial crime research (pp. 3-31). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
62.
WeisburdD.GroffE.YangS.-M. (2012). The criminology of place: Street segments and our understanding of the crime problem. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
63.
WickerA. W. (1987). Behavior settings reconsidered: Temporal stages, resources, internal dynamics, context. In StokelsD.AltmanI. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 613-653). New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
64.
WilkinsonD. L. (2007). Local social ties and willingness to intervene: Textured views among violent urban youth of neighborhood social control dynamics and situations. Justice Quarterly, 24, 185-220.
