This article explores how several prominent theories explain how and where crime events occur. In particular, rational choice, lifestyle-routine activities, crime pattern, and multilevel opportunity theories are applied to offender searches for targets. Examples from qualitative and quantitative works are used to illustrate these theoretical concepts as applied to offenders’ target selection and journey to crime. While both of these types of studies help to shed light on these topics, the ethnographic works have been particularly instrumental in understanding offenders’ searches for targets. Finally, new directions or suggestions for future research are discussed, mainly the application to school shootings (or other mass murders) and online crimes.
BennettT.WrightR. (1984). Burglars on burglary: Prevention and the offender. Brookfield, VT: Gower.
2.
BernascoW. (2006). Co-offending and the choice of target areas in burglary. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 3, 139-155.
3.
BernascoW. (2010). A sentimental journey to crime: Effects of residential history on crime location choice. Criminology, 48, 389-416.
4.
BernascoW.BlockR. (2009). Where offenders choose to attack: A discrete choice model of robberies in Chicago. Criminology, 47, 93-130.
5.
BernascoW.NieuwbeertaP. (2005). How do residential burglars select target areas?British Journal of Criminology, 45, 296-315.
6.
BichlerG.Christie-MerrallJ.SechrestD. (2011). Examining juvenile delinquency within activity space: Building a context for offender travel patterns. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 48, 472-506.
7.
BlockR.BernascoW. (2009). Finding a serial burglar’s home using distance decay and conditional origin-destination patterns: A test of empirical Bayes journey-to-crime estimation in The Hague. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 6, 187-211.
8.
BragaA. A.HureauD. M.PapachristosA. V. (2011). The relevance of micro places to citywide robbery trends: A longitudinal analysis of robbery incidents at street corners and block faces in Boston. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 48, 7-32.
9.
BrantinghamP. J.BrantinghamP. L. (1981). Notes on the geometry of crime. In BrantinghamP. J.BrantinghamP. L. (Eds.), Environmental criminology (pp. 27-54). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
10.
BrantinghamP. J.BrantinghamP. L. (1984). Patterns in crime. New York, NY: Macmillan.
11.
BrantinghamP. J.BrantinghamP. L. (1991). Environmental criminology (2nd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
12.
BrantinghamP. L.BrantinghamP. J. (1993). Nodes, paths, and edge considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 3-28.
13.
BrantinghamP. L.BrantinghamP. J. (1995). Criminality of place: Crime generators and crime attractors. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3, 5-26.
14.
CapellerW. (2001). Not such a neat net: Some comments on virtual criminality. Social & Legal Studies, 10, 229-242.
15.
CaponeD. L.NicholsW. W.Jr. (1976). Urban structure and criminal mobility. American Behavioral Scientist, 20, 199-213.
ClarkeR. V.CornishD. B. (1985). Modeling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 6, 147-185.
18.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activities approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
CopesH.CherbonneauM. (2006). The key to auto theft: Emerging methods of auto theft from the offenders’ perspective. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 917-934.
21.
CopesH.HochstetlerA. (2006). Why I’ll talk: Offenders’ motives for participating in qualitative research. In CromwellP. (Ed.), In their own words: Criminals on crime (4th ed., pp. 19-28). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
22.
CoupeT.BlakeL. (2006). Daylight and darkness targeting strategies and the risks of being seen at residential burglaries. Criminology, 44, 431-464.
23.
DeakinJ.SmithsonH.SpencerJ.Medina-ArizaJ. (2007). Taxing on the streets: Understanding the methods and process of street robbery. Crime Prevention & Community Safety, 9, 52-67.
24.
FelsonM. (2006). Crime and human nature. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
FinkelhorD.AsdigianN. L. (1996). Risk factors for youth victimization beyond a lifestyle/routine activities theory approach. Violence and Victims, 11, 3-19.
26.
GraboskyP. N. (2001). Virtual criminality: Old wine in new bottles?Social & Legal Studies, 10, 243-249.
27.
GroffE.McEwenT. (2006). Exploring the spatial configuration of places related to homicide events: Final report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
28.
HindelangM. J.GottfredsonM. R.GarofaloJ. (1978). Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
29.
JacobsB. A. (2000). Robbing drug dealers: Violence beyond the law. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
30.
JacobsB. A.CherbonneauM. (2014). Auto theft and restrictive deterrence. Justice Quarterly, 31, 344-367.
LaGrangeT. C. (1999). The impact of neighborhoods, schools, and malls on the spatial distribution of property damage. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 36, 393-422.
33.
LammersM.BernascoW. (2013). Are mobile offenders less likely to be caught? The influence of the geographical dispersion of serial offenders’ crime locations on their probability of arrest. European Journal of Criminology, 10, 168-186.
34.
MorselliC.RoyerM. N. (2008). Criminal mobility and criminal achievement. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 45, 4-21.
35.
NeeC.MeenaghanA. (2006). Expert decision making in burglars. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 935-949.
36.
PizarroJ. M.CorsaroN.YuS. V. (2007). Journey to crime and victimization: An application of routine activities theory and environmental criminology to homicide. Victims & Offenders, 2, 375-394.
RengertG. F.WasilchickJ. (2000). Suburban burglary: A tale of two suburbs (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
39.
ReynaldD.AverdijkM.ElffersH.BernascoW. (2008). Do social barriers affect urban crime trips? The effects of ethnic and economic neighbourhood compositions on the flow of crime in The Hague, The Netherlands. Built Environment, 34, 21-31.
40.
ReynsB. W.HensonB.FisherB. S. (2011). Being pursued online: Applying cyberlifestyle-routine activities theory to cyberstalking victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1149-1169.
41.
RossmoD. K. (2000). Geographic profiling. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
42.
ScottM. S. (2001). Robbery at automated teller machines (Problem-Specific Guides Series, No. 8). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing.
43.
ShermanL. W.GartinP. R.BuergerM. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27, 27-55.
44.
ShoverN. (1996). Great pretenders: Pursuits and careers of persistent thieves. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
45.
SnookB. (2004). Individual differences in distance travelled by serial burglars. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 1, 53-66.
46.
SnookB.WrightM.HouseJ. C.AlisonL. J. (2006). Searching for a needle in a needle stack: Combining criminal careers and journey-to-crime research for criminal suspect prioritization. Police Practice & Research, 7, 217-230.
47.
St. JeanP. K. B. (2007). Pockets of crime: Broken windows, collective efficacy, and the criminal point of view. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
48.
TillyerM. S.TillyerR. (2014). Maybe I should do this alone: A comparison of solo and co-offending robbery outcomes. Justice Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/07418825.2014.883422
49.
TopalliV. (2005). Criminal expertise and offender decision-making: An experimental analysis of how offenders and non-offenders differentially perceive social stimuli. British Journal of Criminology, 45, 269-295.
50.
TopalliV.WrightR. T. (2006). Dubs and dees, beats and rims: Carjackers and urban violence. In CromwellP. (Ed.), In their own words: Criminals on crime (4th ed., pp. 129-141). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
51.
TownsleyM.SidebottomA. (2010). All offenders are equal, but some are more equal than others: Variation in journeys to crime between offenders. Criminology, 48, 897-917.
Van DaeleS.Vander BekenT. (2011a). Outbound offending: The journey to crime and crime sprees. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 70-78.
54.
Van DaeleS.Vander BekenT. (2011b). Out of sight, out of mind? Awareness space and mobile offenders. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 19, 125-137.
55.
Van KoppenP. J.JansenR. W. J. (1998). The road to robbery: Travel patterns in commercial robberies. British Journal of Criminology, 38, 230-246.
56.
WallD. S. (2001). Introduction: Crime and the internet. In WallD. S. (Ed.), Crime and the internet: Cybercrimes and cyberfears (pp. 1-17). London, England: Routledge.
57.
WeisburdD.BushwayS.LumC.YangS. M. (2004). Trajectories of crime at places: A longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology, 42, 283-321.
58.
WeiselD. L. (2007). Bank robbery (Problem-Specific Guides Series, No. 48). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing.
59.
WheelerA. (2012). The moving home effect: A quasi experiment assessing effect of home location on the offence location. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28, 587-606.
60.
WilcoxP.GialopsosB. M.LandK. C. (2013). Multilevel criminal opportunity. In CullenF. T.WilcoxP. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminological theory (pp. 579-601). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
61.
WilcoxP.LandK. C.HuntS. A. (2003). Criminal circumstance: A dynamic, multi-contextual criminal opportunity theory. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
62.
WilesP.CostelloA. (2000). The “road to nowhere”: The evidence for travelling criminals (Home Office Research Studies, No. 207). London, England: Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
63.
WrightR. T.DeckerS. H. (1994). Burglars on the job: Streetlife and residential break-ins. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
64.
WrightR. T.DeckerS. H. (1997). Armed robbers in action: Stickups and street culture. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
65.
WrightR. T.LogieR. H.DeckerS. H. (1995). Criminal expertise and offender decision making: An experimental study of the target selection process in residential burglary. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 32, 39-53.
