ElliottD.HuizingaDAgetonS.1985. Explaining Delinquency and Drug Use. Beverly Hills, Cal.:Sage
2.
EnzmannD.MarshallI. H.KilliasM.Junger-TasJ.SteketeeM.GruszczynskaB. B. (2010). Self-report youth delinquency in Europe and beyond: First results of the International Self-Report Delinquency Study in the context of police data (European Sourcebook) and Victimization studies (ICVS). European Journal of Criminology, 7(2). 159-181.
3.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
ISRD-2 Working Group. (2005). Questionnaire ISRD-2: Standard student questionnaire. Boston, Hamburg, Utrecht, Warsaw, and Zurich: European Society of Criminology. http://webapp5.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/ISRD/JDEB/
5.
Junger-TasJ.EnzmannD.SteketeeM.MarshallI. H. (2012). Concluding observations: The big picture. In Junger-TasJ.MarshallI. H.EnzmannD.KilliasM.SteketeeeM.GruszczynskaB. (Eds.), The many faces of youth crime. Contrasting theoretical perspectives on juvenile delinquency across countries and cultures (pp. 329-353). New York: Springer.
6.
Junger-TasJ.MarshallI. H. (2012). Introduction to the International Self-Report Study of Delinquency (ISRD-2). In Junger-TasJ.MarshallI. H.EnzmannD.KilliasM.SteketeeM.GruszczyńskaB. (Eds.), The many faces of youth crime. Contrasting theoretical perspectives on juvenile delinquency across countries and cultures (pp. 3-20). New York: Springer.
7.
Junger-TasJ.MarshallI. H.EnzmannD.KilliasM.SteketeeM.GruszczyńskaB. (2010). History and design of the ISRD studies. In Junger-TasJ.MarshallI. H.EnzmannD.KilliasM.SteketeeM.GruszczyńskaB. (Eds.), Juvenile delinquency in Europe and beyond. Results of the Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study (pp. 1-11). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
8.
Junger-TasJ.MarshallI.RibeaudD. (2003). Delinquency in an international perspective: The international self-reported delinquency study. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press; Den Haag, the Netherlands: Kluger.
9.
Junger-TasJ.TerlouwG. J.KleinM. W. (Eds.). (1994). Delinquent behavior among young people in the western world. Amsterdam, the Netherlands; New York: Kugler.
10.
Lappi-SeppalaT. (2007). Penal policy and prisoner rates in Scandinavia: Cross-comparative perspectives on penal severity. In NuotioK. (Ed.), Festschrift in honour of raimo lahti (pp. 265-306). Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki, Publications of the Faculty of Law.
11.
MarshallI. H. (2010). “Pourquoi pas?” versus “absolutely not.”European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 16, 89-109.
12.
MarshallI. H.EnzmannD. (2012). Methodology and design of the ISRD-2 study. In Junger-TasJ.MarshallI. H.EnzmannD.KilliasM.SteketeeM.GruszczyńskaB. (Eds.), The many faces of youth crime: Contrasting theoretical perspectives on juvenile delinquency across countries and cultures (pp. 21-65). New York: Springer.
13.
MarshallI. H.WebbV. J. (1990). Omaha IRSD pilot study. Paper presented at the meeting of International Self-report Delinquency Project, the Hague, the Netherlands.
14.
Saint-ArnaudS.BernardP. (2003). Convergence or resilience? A hierarchical cluster analysis of the welfare regimes in advanced countries. Current Sociology, 51, 499-527.
15.
SmitP.MarshallI. H.van GammerenM. (2008). An empirical approach to country clustering. In AromaaK.HeiskanenM. (Eds.), Crime and criminal justice systems in Europe and North America 1995-2004 (pp. 169-195). Helsinki, Finland: HEUNI (European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control, Affiliated with the United Nations).
16.
VettenburgN. (1988). Schoolervaringen, delinquentie en maatschappelijke kwetsbaarheid [School experiences, delinquency and societal vulnerability]. Leuven, Belgium: Onderzoeksgroep Jeugdcriminologie.
17.
ZhangS.BensonT.DengX. (2000). A test-retest reliability assessment of the International Self-Report Delinquency Instrument. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 283-295.