This article argues that the focus of many criminologists and art crime scholars is too often rather narrow, and promotes a more expansive notion of “art crime” —one that centers not on crime, but on the relationship between art and crime. More specifically, this article argues for an approach to “art crime” that contemplates “socially injurious acts” or omissions involving art that are not defined as “crime” or proscribed by civil or criminal statutes. Employing this “harm-based” approach, this article examines the responses to Damian Hirst’s The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living—a piece consisting of a 14-ft tiger shark (caught by a fisherman commissioned to do so) immersed in formaldehyde in a vitrine of glass and steel—to demonstrate how art criticism can be employed as a tool for dissent, especially in cases involving art that causes ecological or environmental harms.
AdamsJ. (2005, February). Czech judge rules for Canadian family. ARTNews, p. 72.
2.
AkinshaK.HochfieldS. (2005, April). Poland pushes for lost durers. ARTnews, p. 64.
3.
AlderC.PolkK. (2002). Stopping this awful business: The illicit traffic in antiquities examined as a criminal market. Art, Antiquity and Law, 7(1), 35-53.
4.
AlderC.PolkK. (2005). The illicit traffic in plundered antiquities. In ReichelP. (Ed.), Handbook of transnational crime and justice (pp. 98-113). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
5.
AngierN. (2010, August10). A masterpiece of nature? Yuck!The New York Times, pp. D1, D4.
6.
ArsuS. (2006, June13). Art thefts highlight lax security in Turkey. The New York Times, pp. B1, B2.
7.
Associated Press. (2009, October8). Egypt, demanding artifacts’ return, cuts ties with the louvre. The New York Times, p. A7.
BeirneP.SouthN. (2007). Introduction: Approaching green criminology. In BeirneP.SouthN. (Eds.), Issues in green criminology: Confronting harms against environments, humanity and other animals (pp. xiii-xxii). Devon, UK: Willan.
18.
BentleyD. (2010). The world of art disputes is an intriguing and growing area of practice. International Bar News, 64(2), 21-24.
19.
BerghausG. (1995). Happenings in Europe: Trends, events, and leading figures. In SandfordM. R. (Ed.), Happenings and other acts (pp. 310-388). London, UK: Routledge.
20.
BezansonR. P. (1998). The quality of first amendment speech. Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, 20, 275-395.
21.
BogdanosM. (2008). Thieves of Baghdad: Combating global traffic in stolen Iraqi antiquities. Fordham International Law Journal, 31, 725-739.
22.
BoggsJ. S. G. (1993). Who owns this?Chicago-Kent Law Review, 68, 889-910.
23.
BorodkinL. J. (1995). The economics of antiquities looting and a proposed legal alternative. Columbia Law Review, 95, 377-417.
24.
BoschelliB. (2008). Johnny and me: The true story of John Wayne Gacy. Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse.
25.
BowenA. (2011, May2). 30 years later, artist still in the dog house. Metro New York, p. 02.
26.
BowmanB. A. (2007, November 15). Stolen history: Theft and illicit export of cultural property. Poster presented at 2007 American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA.
27.
BowmanB. A. (2008, November 12). Criminal dynamics of the international antiquities market. Paper presented at the 2008 American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting, St. Louis, MO.
28.
BrensonM. (2001). Visionaries and outcasts: The NEA, Congress, and the place of the visual artist in America. New York: The New Press.
29.
BreyI. D. (2009). The Venus Fixers: The remarkable story of the allied soldiers who saved Italy’s art during World War II. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
30.
BrismanA. (2005). The aesthetics of wind energy systems. New York University Environmental Law Journal, 13(1), 1-133.
31.
BrismanA. (2007, November 15). Still a “crime of style”? The proliferation of graffiti in galleries and museums. Poster presented at 2007 American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA.
32.
BrismanA. (2008, November 6). Graffiti: A revolutionary tool or a co-opted aesthetic?Paper presented at The Eighth Biennial Radical Philosophy Association Conference (“Art, Praxis, and Social Transformation: Radical Dreams and Visions”), San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA.
33.
BrismanA. (2010). “Creative crime” and the phytological analogy. Crime Media Culture, 6, 205-225.
34.
BrismanA. (2010/2011). Fictionalized criminal law and youth legal consciousness. New York Law School Law Review, 55, 1039-1071.
35.
BrismanA. (2011). Vandalizing meaning, stealing memory: Artistic, cultural, and theoretical implications of crime in galleries and museums. Critical Criminology, 19(1), 15-28.
36.
BrooksE. M. (1989). “Tilted” justice: Site-specific art and moral rights after U.S. adherence to the Berne Convention. California Law Review, 77, 1431-1482.
37.
BrydonA.GreenhillP. (2003). Representations of crime: On showing paintings by a serial killer. In ParnellP. C.KaneS. C. (Eds.), Crime’s power: Anthropologists and the ethnography of crime (pp. 145-172). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
38.
CahillT. (1987). Buried dreams: Inside the mind of serial killer John Wayne Gacy. New York, NY: Bantam.
39.
CarassavaA. (2006, May17). Getty director to seek return of antiquities to Greece. The New York Times, pp. B1, B2.
40.
CarrollS. B. (2009, September15). In a shark’s tooth, a new family tree. The New York Times, pp. D1, D4.
41.
CarvajalD. (2010, May21). On (surprisingly quiet) parisian night, a Picasso and a Matisse go out the window. The New York Times, p. A4.
42.
CazauxG. (2007). Labelling animals: Non-speciest criminology and techniques to identify other animals. In BeirneP.SouthN. (Eds.), Issues in green criminology: Confronting harms against environments, humanity and other animals (pp. 87-113). Devon, UK: Willan.
ChanS. (2005, January7). The trouble with catching the train, on film. The New York Times, p. A19.
45.
ChangD. N. (2006). Stealing beauty: Stopping the madness of illicit art trafficking. Houston Journal of International Law, 28, 829-869.
46.
ChoiA. M. (1999). National endowment for the arts v. Finley: A dispute over the “Decency and Respect” Provision. Akron Law Review, 32, 327-350.
47.
ConklinJ. E. (1994). Art crime. Westport, CT: Praeger.
48.
CotterH. (2010, August27). Emerald deities of fervor and flux. The New York Times, pp. C21, C24.
49.
CoxC. (2005). Of humans, animals, and monsters. In ThompsonN. (Ed.), Becoming animal: Contemporary art in the animal kingdom (pp. 18-25). North Adams: MASS MoCA Publications.
50.
CubaS. (1999). Stop the clock: The case to suspend the statute of limitations on claims for Nazi-looted art. Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 17, 447-489.
51.
CunnaneK. M. (1999). Maintaining viewpoint neutrality for the NEA:National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley. Connecticut Law Review, 31, 1445-1483.
52.
CzeglediB. (2010a). Crimes against art: International art and cultural heritage law. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Carswell.
53.
CzeglediB. (2010b). Crimes against culture merit serious consequences. Canadian Criminal Law Review, 15, 111-127.
54.
de JaegerC. (1981). The Linz file: Hitler’s plunder of Europe’s art. Exeter, UK: Webb & Bower.
55.
DeGraziaE. E. (1994). In search of artistic excellence: Structural reform of the national endowment for the arts. Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 12, 133-179.
56.
DeKeseredyW. S. (2009). Male violence against women in North America as hate crime. In PerryB. (Ed.), Hate crimes Volume 3: The victims of hate crime (pp. 151-172). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
57.
DeKeseredyW. S. (2011a). Contemporary critical criminology. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
58.
DeKeseredyW. S. (2011b). Violence against women: Myths, facts, controversies. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
59.
DeKeseredyW. S.SchwartzM. D. (1998). Woman abuse on campus: Results from the Canadian National Survey. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
60.
DeKeseredyW. S.SchwartzM. D. (2009).Dangerous exits: Escaping abusive relationships in rural America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
61.
DempseyJ. (2009, October20). A 3,500-year-old queen causes a rift between Germany and Egypt. The New York Times, p. A12.
62.
DeptaS. L. (1996). Twice saved or twice stolen? The trophy art tug-of-war between Russia and Germany. Temple International and Comparative Law Journal, 10, 371-394.
63.
DerrossettA. (2007). The final solution: Making title insurance mandatory for art sold in auction houses and displayed in museums that is likely to be holocaust-looted art. Thomas M. Cooley Journal of Practical and Clinical Law, 9, 223-255.
64.
DolnickE. (2004, August24). Stealing beauty. The New York Times, p. A21.
65.
DwyerJ. (2009, February18). No photo ban in subways, yet an arrest. The New York Times, p. A21.
66.
EakinH. (2006a, May2). Must looted relics be ignored?The New York Times, pp. B1, B7.
67.
EakinH. (2006b, May15). Getty chief stays calm amid antiquities storm. The New York Times, pp. B1, B7.
68.
EakinH. (2006c, July26). Getty Museum agrees to return two antiquities to Greece. The New York Times, pp. B1, B7.
69.
EakinH. (2010, June3). Italy focuses on a Princeton curator in an antiquities investigation. The New York Times, pp. C1, C4.
70.
EdidinP. (2007, December29). Arts, briefly: Ruling on Nazi art. The New York Times, p. A18.
71.
Editorial. (2007, July20). Dumping the shark. The New York Times, p. A22.
72.
Editorial. (2009, July29). The death of sharks. The New York Times, p. A22.
73.
Editorial. (2010, November28). Repatriating tut. The New York Times, p. A24.
74.
EdselR. M. (2006). Rescuing Da Vinci: Hitler and the Nazis stole Europe’s great art—America and her allies recovered it. Dallas, TX: Laurel.
75.
EdselR. M. (2009). The monuments men: Allied heroes, Nazi thieves and the greatest treasure hunt in history. New York, NY: Center Street.
76.
EhlE. C. (1998). The settlement of Greece v. Ward: Who loses?Boston University Law Review, 78, 661-690.
77.
EisenbergA. N. (2000). The Brooklyn Museum controversy and the issue of government-funded expression. Brooklyn Law Review, 66, 275-308.
78.
ElstonM. J. (1993). Artists and unconstitutional conditions: The Big Bad Wolf won’t subsidize Little Red Riding Hood’s indecent art. Law & Contemporary Problems, 56, 327-361.
EsterowM. (2005a, June). Fakes, frauds, and fake fakers. ARTNews, pp. 98-102, 104-105.
81.
EsterowM. (2005b, June). The 10 most faked artists. ARTNews, p. 103.
82.
FalkensteinM. (2005, May). The training of the guards. ARTNews, pp. 134-137.
83.
FelicianoH. (1997). The lost museum: The Nazi conspiracy to steal the world’s greatest works of art. New York, NY: Basic Books.
84.
FerrellJ. (1995a). Culture, Crime, and Cultural Criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 3, 25-42.
85.
FerrellJ. (1995b). Urban graffiti: Crime, control, and resistance. Youth and Society, 27(1), 73-92.
86.
FerrellJ. (1995c). The world politics of wall painting. In FerrellJ.SandersC. R. (Eds.), Cultural criminology (pp. 277-294). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
87.
FerrellJ. (1996). Crimes of style: Urban graffiti and the politics of criminality. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
FerrellJ. (1999). Cultural Criminology. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 25, 395-418.
90.
FerrellJ. (2001). Tearing down the streets: Adventures in urban anarchy. New York, NY: Palgrave.
91.
FerrellJ. (2003). Cultural Criminology. In SchwartzM. D.HattyS. E. (Eds.), Controversies in Critical Criminology (pp. 71-84). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Company.
92.
FerrellJ. (2009). Crime and culture. In HaleC.HaywardK.WahidinA.WincupE. (Eds.), Criminology (2nd ed., pp. 157-175). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
93.
FeuerA. (2004, June7). Subway photography ban spurs underground protest. The New York Times, p. A26.
94.
FinchamD. (2010). Towards a rigorous standard for the good faith acquisition of antiquities. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 37, 145-206.
95.
FineG. A.ShatinD. (1985). Crimes against art: Social meaning and symbolic attacks. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 3, 135-152.
96.
FinebergJ. (1995). Art since 1940: Strategies of being. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
97.
FinnR. (1999, December14). Art dealer sees arrest as an affirmation. The New York Times, p. B2.
98.
FreemanM. (2000). First amendment protection for the arts after NEA v. Finley. Brandeis Law Journal, 38, 405-422.
99.
GamboniD. (1997). The destruction of art: Iconoclasm and vandalism since the French Revolution. London, UK: Reaktion Books.
100.
GarsonF. (2001). Before that artist came along, it was just a bridge: The Visual Artists Rights Act and the removal of site-specific artwork. Cornell Journal of Law & Public Policy, 11, 203-244.
101.
GefterP. (2006, March19). The theater of the street, the subject of the photograph. The New York Times, p. AR29.
GerstenblithP. (2006). From Bamiyan to Baghdad: Warfare and the preservation of cultural heritage at the beginning of the 21st century. Georgetown Journal of International Law, 37, 245-351.
GibbsC.GoreM. L.McGarrellE. F.RiversL.III. (2010). Introducing conservation criminology: Towards interdisciplinary scholarship on environmental crimes and risks. British Journal of Criminology, 50, 124-144.
106.
GiocondaJ. C. (2008). Can intellectual property laws stem the rising tide of art forgeries?Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, 31, 47-77.
107.
GlabersonW. (2005, April14). In Swiss Bank case, a glimpse of Nazi theft. The New York Times, pp. A1, A25.
108.
GlueckG. (2005, August26). The line between species shifts, and a show explores the move. The New York Times, p. B25.
109.
GlueckG. (2007, May18). They are inauthentic, yes, but beautiful. The New York Times, p. E31.
110.
GoldbergA. (2006). Reaffirming McClain: The National Stolen Property Act and the abiding trade in looted cultural objects. UCLA Law Review, 53, 1031-1071.
111.
GreerG. (2008, September22). Germaine Greer note to Robert Hughes: Bob, dear, Damien Hirst is just one of many artists you don’t get. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2008/sep/22/1
112.
GroverS. F. (1992). The need for civil-law nations to adopt discovery rules in art replevin actions: A comparative study. Texas Law Review, 70, 1431-1467.
113.
GussowM. (2004, July1). Professor is indicted over use of biological materials in art. The New York Times, p. A20.
114.
HarmanciR. (2010a, August14). Tale of Ansel Adams negatives grows hazy. The New York Times, pp. C1, C7.
115.
HarmanciR. (2010b, August31). A turnaround in Ansel Adams photo dispute. The New York Times, pp. C1, C5.
HawkinsA.RothmanR. A.GoldsteinD. B. (1995). A tale of two innocents: Creating an equitable balance between the rights of former owners and good faith purchasers of stolen art. Fordham Law Review, 64, 49-96.
118.
HeinsM. (1996). Sex, sin and blasphemy: A guide to America’s censorship wars. New York, NY: The New Press.
119.
HenryM. (2005a, April). Claim against Liz Taylor rejected. ARTNews, p. 52.
120.
HenryM. (2005b, March). Restitution: Broken promises. ARTNews, pp. 100-111.
121.
HenryM. (2005c, April). Wrangling over “Wally.”ARTnews, p. 45.
122.
HirstD.BurnG. (2002). On the way to work. London, UK: Faber and Faber.
123.
HoffmanJ. (2004). Sabotage as a means of artistic performativity. In WeidnerC. (Ed.), Legal/illegal: Art beyond law (pp. 201-216). Berlin, Germany: NGBK; Stuggart, Germany: Schmetterling Verlag.
124.
HuangE. E. (2008). Looting in Iraq, five years later: An evaluation of the international protection, recovery, and repatriation of looted cultural artifacts. Rutgers Race & the Law Review, 10, 183-223.
125.
HughesJ. (2001). The line between work and framework, text and context. Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 19, 19-38.
IrvingC. (1969). Fake! The story of Elmyr de Hory, the greatest art forger of our time. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
130.
ItzkoffD. (2009a, April10). Arts, briefly: Germany to continue restitution of art. The New York Times, p. C6.
131.
ItzkoffD. (2009b, July10). Arts, briefly: Hirst has designs on Armstrong’s bike. The New York Times, p. C5.
132.
ItzkoffD. (2009c, November25). Arts, briefly: Hirst studio hard times. The New York Times, p. C2.
133.
ItzkoffD. (2010, July20). Banned TV episode has its day on DVD. The New York Times, pp. C1, C5.
134.
IzenbergD. (2005, March). Israel arrests antiquities forgers. ARTNews, p. 72.
135.
JamesC. (2005, September12). Beyond comforting the afflicted. The New York Times, pp. B1, B7.
136.
JohnsonK. (2005, February11). Art in review: [Review of] Günter Brus, “Dirty Embellishments.”The New York Times, p. B35.
137.
KeimR. (2003). Filling the gap between morality and jurisprudence: The use of binding arbitration to resolve claims of restitution regarding Nazi-stolen art. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, 3, 295-315.
138.
KellingG. L.ColesC. M. (1996). Fixing broken windows: Restoring order and reducing crime in our communities. New York, NY: Touchstone.
139.
KennedyR. (2005a, July3). The artists in the hazmat suits. The New York Times, p. 21.
140.
KennedyR. (2005b, May29). Is this a real Jackson Pollock?The New York Times, pp. 28-29.
141.
KennedyR. (2006a, February9). Computer analysis suggests paintings are not Pollocks. The New York Times, pp. B1, B7.
142.
KennedyR. (2006b, June29). Giving the artists a voice in preserving their work. The New York Times, pp. B1, B6.
143.
KennedyR. (2006c, June29). With a coat of new paint, revealing the true Judd. The New York Times, p. B6.
144.
KennedyR. (2007, November29). Analyst presents case against possible Pollocks. The New York Times, p. C16.
145.
KennedyR. (2009, November18). How to conserve art that lives in a lake?The New York Times, pp. C1, C5.
146.
KennedyR. (2010a, May5). Ghent altarpiece to undergo restoration. The New York Times, p. C2.
147.
KennedyR. (2010b, July19). Shedding darkness on an Eakins painting. The New York Times, pp. C1, C5.
148.
KentS. (1994). Shark infested waters: The Saatchi collection of British art in the 90s. London, UK: Philip Wilson.
149.
KimmelmanM. (1999, October1). After all that yelling, time to think. The New York Times, p. E31.
150.
KimmelmanM. (2005, February6). Art’s last, lonely cowboy. The New York Times Magazine, pp. 32-41, 59, 72, 78.
151.
KimmelmanM. (2006, February12). A drip by any other name. The New York Times, p. WK16.
152.
KimmelmanM. (2009, October24). When ancient artifacts become political pawns. The New York Times, pp. A1, A3.
153.
KindermanS. A. (1993). The UNIDROIT Draft Convention on Cultural Objects: An examination of the need for a uniform legal framework for controlling the illicit movement of cultural property. Emory International Law Review, 7, 457-536.
154.
KleinR. (2001). Breaking and entering. In Art at the edge of the law (pp. 1-20). Ridgfield, CT: The Aldrich Museum of Contemporary Art.
155.
KowalskiK. M. (1999). National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley: Painting a grim picture for federally-funded art. DePaul Law Review, 49, 217-273.
156.
KozenczakJ. R.HenriksonK. M. (2003). The Chicago killer: The hunt for serial killer John Wayne Gacy. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris.
157.
KrasilovskyG. (1996). A sculpture is worth a thousand words: The First Amendment Rights of homeowners publicly displaying art on private property. Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts, 20, 521-552.
158.
KulishN. (2010, July24). Vandals damage memorial to Egyptian woman killed in Germany. The New York Times, p. A6.
159.
KunitzM. (2001). Switzerland & the international trade in art & antiquities. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 21, 519-542.
160.
LaceyM. (2005, October8). The ancient art of Africa, at risk. The New York Times, p. A17-A23.
161.
LandiA. (2005, June). Seeing infrared: An array of new and sophisticated technologies can help determine an artwork’s authenticity—or lack thereof. ARTnews, pp. 106-109.
LeeF. R. (2005, May19). Arbitration set for case of looted art. The New York Times, p. B3.
165.
LeeF. R. (2011, March31). Getty returns painting from Nazi-looted collection. The New York Times, p. C2.
166.
LernerR. E.BreslerJ. (1998). Art Law: The guide for collectors, investors, dealers, and artists (Vol. 1&2, 2nd ed.). New York, NY: Practicing Law Institute.
167.
LethbridgeL. (2005, March). The case of the theft-prone museum. ARTNews, p. 70.
168.
LinedeckerC. L. (1980). The man who killed boys. New York, NY: St. Martin’s.
169.
LyallS. (2004, August26). Stolen art can reappear in unexpected ways. The New York Times, pp. B1, B5.
170.
LynchM. J.StreteskyP. (2007). Green criminology in the United States. In BeirneP.SouthN. (Eds.), Issues in green criminology: Confronting harms against environments, humanity and other animals (pp. 248-269). Devon, UK: Willan.
171.
MachD. (1997). The bold and the beautiful: Art, public spaces, and the First Amendment. New York University Law Review, 72, pp. 383-429.
172.
MackenzieS. R. M. (2005a). Dig a bit deeper: Law, regulation and the illicit antiquities market. British Journal of Criminology, 45, 249-268.
173.
MackenzieS. R. M. (2005b). Going, going, gone: Regulating the market in illicit antiquities. Leicester, UK: Institute of Art and Law.
174.
MackenzieS. R. M. (2009). Identifying and preventing opportunities for organized crime in the international antiquities market. In ManacordaS. (Ed.), Organised crime in art and antiquities (pp. 95-108). Milan, Italy: International Scientific and Professional Advisory Council of the United Nations Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Programme.
175.
MakeenM. F. (2000). Copyright in a global information society: The scope of copyright protection under International, U.S., U.K., and French Law. London, UK: Kluwer Law International.
176.
MalkinE. (2009, September29). Kahlo trove: Fact or fakery?The New York Times, pp. C1, C5.
177.
MaloneyM. (1997). Everyone a winner! Selected British art from the Saatchi collection 1987-97. In RosenthalN.. (Ed.), Sensation: Young British artists from the Saatchi collection (pp. 26-34). London, UK: Royal Academy of Arts.
178.
MartelR. J. (2003). The should-it-stay or should-it-go spotlight: Protection of site-specific art under VARA. DePaul-LCA Journal of Art and Entertainment Law, 13, 101-121.
179.
MarxG. T. (1995). Electric eye in the sky: Some reflections on the new surveillance and popular culture. In FerrellJ.SandersC. R. (Eds.), Cultural criminology (pp. 106-141). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
180.
McElroyS. (2009, April13). Arts, briefly: Art returned to owners’ heirs. The New York Times, p. C2.
181.
McFaddenR. D. (2004, May21). Citing security, subway officials seek picture ban. The New York Times, p. B4.
182.
McFarland-TaylorL. (1998). Tracking stolen artworks on the Internet: A new standard for due diligence. John Marshall Journal of Computer and Information Law, 16, 937-969.
183.
MendenhallH. H. (1996). Fall of the house of Gacy: The only authorized biography of John Wayne Gacy, serial killer. West Frankfort, IL: New Authors Publications.
184.
MossJ.KottlerJ. (1999). The last victim: A true-life journey into the mind of a serial killer. New York: Warner Books, Inc.
185.
MunderH. (Ed.). (2009). Henrik Olesen: Some faggy gestures. Zürich, Switzerland: JRP|Ringier.
186.
MydansS. (2009, August1). A legacy of war: Fake art in Vietnam. The New York Times, pp. C1, C5.
187.
MyersS. L. (2005, May17). In Moscow, a proud display of spoils of war. The New York Times, pp. B1, B7.
188.
MyersS. L. (2010, July14). In Iraq, modern art’s waiting game. The New York Times, pp. C1, C7.
189.
NagourneyA. (2011, April23). Admirers call it art, but the police call it a problem. The New York Times, p. A9.
190.
NahitchevanskyG. (1990). Free speech and government funding: Does the government have to fund what it doesn’t like. Brooklyn Law Review, 56, 213-263.
191.
NavarroM. (2007, June10). On abortion, hollywood is no-choice. The New York Times, pp. 1, 8.
192.
NeaC. R. (1993). Content restrictions and national endowment for the arts funding: An analysis from the artist’s perspective. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2, 165-184.
193.
NealA. G. (1985). Animism and totemism in popular culture. Journal of Popular Culture, 19(2), 15-24.
194.
NewmanA. (1999, September30). Art dealer is arrested for exhibition of live ammunition. The New York Times, p. B1.
195.
NewmanC. L. (2003). Eyes wide open, minds white shut: Art, obscenity, and the First Amendment in contemporary America. DePaul Law Review, 53, 121-158.
196.
NicholasL. H. (1994). The rape of Europa: The fate of Europe’s treasures in the Third Reich and the Second World War. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
197.
O’ConnorA. (2005, May17). If taking a painting, don’t leave pictures behind. The New York Times, p. A21.
198.
O’NeilR. M. (1991). Artists, grants and rights: The NEA controversy revisited. New York Law School Journal of Human Rights, 9, 85-107.
199.
ParmarN. (2005, February). FBI launches art-theft squad. ARTNews, p. 60.
200.
PellO. C. (1999). The potential for a mediation/arbitration commission to resolve disputes relating to artworks stolen or looted during World War II. DePaul-LCA Journal of Art and Entertainment Law, 10, 27-66.
201.
PerkinsC. S. (2001). The Seattle Art Museum: A good faith Donee injured in the restoration of art stolen during World War II. John Marshall Law Review, 34, 613-635.
202.
PerraraD. (2005, February). FBI puts painting under house arrest. ARTNews, p. 58.
203.
PogrebinR. (2007, June6). Afghanistan exhibition provokes questions. The New York Times, pp. B1, B8.
204.
PollockB. E. (2006). Out of the night and fog: Permitting litigation to prompt an international resolution to Nazi-looted art claims. Houston Law Review, 43, 193-233.
205.
PortK. L. (1993). Foreword: Symposium on intellectual property law theory. Chicago-Kent Law Review,68, 585-606.
206.
PorterE. (2010, February16). The power of art. The New York Times, p. A26.
207.
PovoledoE. (2006, September29). Boston art museum returns works to Italy. The New York Times, pp. B25, B33.
208.
PovoledoE. (2010a, February12). Arts, briefly: Getty must return work, Italian judge rules. The New York Times, p. C5.
209.
PovoledoE. (2010b, January16). Italy presses its fight for a statue at the Getty. The New York Times, p. C3.
210.
PrescottL. M.HarleyJ. P.KleinD. A. (1996). Microbiology (3rd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
211.
ProulxB. B. (2011). Organized criminal involvement in the illicit antiquities trade. Trends in Organized Crime, 14(1), 1-29.
212.
RennisonC. M.DeKeseredyW. S.DragiewiczM. (in press). Intimate relationship status variations in violence against women: Urban, suburban, and rural differences. Violence Against Women: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal.
213.
RidingA. (2005, January29). A powerful collector changes course. The New York Times, pp. A15, A21.
214.
RobertsJ. C. (1997). The protection of indigenous populations’ cultural property in Peru, Mexico and the United States. Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law, 4, 327-360.
215.
RohdeD. (1999a, October1). Art dealer says arrest is an attack on rights. The New York Times, p. B7.
216.
RohdeD. (1999b, October3). Art gallery owner describes night in jail. The New York Times, p. 47.
217.
RosenthalN.StoneR.MaloneyM.AdamsB.JardineL. (Eds.). (1997). Sensation: Young British artists from the Saatchi collection. London, UK: Royal Academy of Arts.
218.
RussL. (2001). Declarations of independence: Art at the edge of law. In Art at the edge of the law (pp. 21-44). Ridgfield, CT: The Aldrich Museum of Contemporary Art.
219.
SabrinA. (1993). Thinking about content: Can it play an appropriate role in government funding of the arts?Yale Law Journal, 102, 1209-1233.
220.
SachsT. (2008). Tom Sachs: Animals. New York, NY: Sperone Westwater.
221.
SalisburyL. (2009). Provenance: How a con man and a forger rewrote the history of modern art. New York, NY: Penguin.
222.
SawkaJ. F. (2009). Reconciling policy and equity: The ability of the internal revenue code to resolve disputes regarding Nazi-looted art. University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review, 17, 91-124.
223.
SchwendingerH.SchwendingerJ. (1975) Defenders of order or guardians of human rights? In TaylorI.WaltonP.YoungJ. (Eds.) Critical Criminology (pp. 113-46). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
224.
SchwartzM. D.DeKeseredyW. S. (1997). Sexual assault on the college campus: The role of male peer support. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
225.
ScottiR. A. (2009). Vanished smile: The mysterious theft of the Mona Lisa. New York, NY: Vintage/Random House.
226.
SeelyeK. Q. (2009, February14). Fallen soldiers, coming home in public. The New York Times, p. WK3.
227.
SenguptaS. (2007, May19). At a university in India, new attacks on an old style: Erotic art. The New York Times, pp. B1, B7.
228.
SenieH. F. (2002). The Tilted Arc controversy: Dangerous precedent?Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
229.
SerraR. (2001). The Tilted Arc controversy. Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 19, 39-49.
230.
Serra v. United States General Services Administration, 667 F. Supp. 1042, 1052 (S.D.N.Y. 1987).
231.
Serra v. United States General Services Administration, 847 F.2d 1045, 1046 (2d Cir. 1988).
232.
SesserS. (2011, February5-6). High alert for Mideast museums. The Wall Street Journal, p. C14.
233.
SisarioB. (2005, May30). Arts briefly: British museum to keep looted drawings. The New York Times, p. B2.
234.
SmithR. (1999, October1). Removing the bullets and trying to judge a show. The New York Times, p. B7.
235.
SmithR. (2007, October16). Just when you thought it was safe. The New York Times, pp. B1, B8.
236.
SmithR. (2008, September20). After the roar of the crowd, an auction post-mortem. The New York Times, pp. B1, B12.
237.
SmithR. (2010, February12). Swagger and sideburns: Bad boys in galleries. The New York Times, pp. C25, C28.
238.
SnyderG. J. (2006). Graffiti media and the perpetuation of an illegal subculture. Crime Media Culture, 2, 93-101.
239.
SnyderG. (2009). Graffiti lives: Beyond the tag in New York’s urban underground. New York, NY: New York University Press.
240.
SouthN.BeirneP. (2006). Green criminology. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
241.
SpencerR. D. (Ed.). (2005). The expert versus the object: Judging fakes and false attributions in the visual arts. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
242.
StabaD. (2004, June7). Use of bacteria in art leads to federal inquiry. The New York Times, p. A26.
243.
StapelJ. K. (1995). Money talks: The First Amendment implications of counterfeiting law. Indiana Law Journal, 71, 153-182.
244.
StewartB. (1999, December7). Judge dismisses case involving 9-millimeter art. The New York Times, p. B1.
245.
StychinC. F. (1994). Identities, sexualities, and the postmodern subject: An analysis of artistic funding by the National Endowment for the Arts. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 12, 79-132.
246.
SullivanT.MaikenP. T. (1983). Killer clown: The John Wayne Gacy murders. New York, NY: Pinnacle Books.
247.
SultanJ. L. (1998). Combating the illicit art trade in the European Union: EUROPOL’s role in recovering stolen artwork. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 18, 759-810.
248.
SwackC. (1998). Safeguarding artistic creation and the cultural heritage: A comparison of droit moral between France and the United States. Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts, 22, 361-406.
249.
SzopaA. (2004). Hoarding history: A survey of antiquity looting and black market trade. University of Miami Business Law Review, 13, 55-89.
250.
TaftG. F. (1998). National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley: Challenging the facial challenge. Campbell Law Review, 21, 81-97.
251.
TaverniseS. (2009, October7). Returned artifacts displayed in Kabul. The New York Times, p. A5.
252.
TaylorK. (2010a, October15). Big fish and fresh cash at London fair. The New York Times, p. C28.
253.
TaylorK. (2010b, May11). Rescuing art from the rubble of the quake. The New York Times, pp. C1, C7.
254.
TaylorK. (2011a, February12). Arts, briefly: Yale and Peru sign an accord. The New York Times, p. C2.
255.
TaylorK. (2011b, January1). Museum wants to return objects, but there’s a hitch. The New York Times, pp. C1, C6.
256.
ThompsonN. (2005). Monstrous empathy. In ThompsonN. (Ed.), Becoming animal: Contemporary art in the animal kingdom (pp. 8-17). North Adams: MASS MoCA Publications.
257.
ThompsonD. (2008). The $12 million stuffed shark: The curious economics of contemporary art. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
TierneyJ. (2009, November17). A case in antiquities for “finders keepers.”The New York Times, pp. D1, D2.
260.
TijhuisE. (2006). Transnational crime and the interface between legal and illegal factors: The case of the illicit art and antiquities trade. Nijmegen, Netherlands: Wolf Legal Publishers.
261.
TopcikJ. (2005, January3). Head of a goat, tail of fish, more than a touch of weirdness. The New York Times, pp. B1, B8.
262.
TrimbleM. J.Van AardeR. J. (2010). Species inequality in scientific study. Conservation Biology, 24, 886-890.
263.
TunnellK. D. (1995). A cultural approach to crime and punishment, bluegrass style. In FerrellJ.SandersC. R. (Eds.), Cultural criminology (pp. 80-105). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
264.
Van GelderL. (2007, February27). Arts, briefly: Cash-and-carry art. The New York Times, p. B2.
265.
Van GelderL. (2008a, April2). Arts, briefly: Art thief changes mind, returns paintings. The New York Times, p. B2.
266.
Van GelderL. (2008b, May9). Arts, briefly: Indian court declares painting not obscene. The New York Times, p. B5.
267.
Van GelderL. (2008c, February20). Arts, briefly: Supreme Court in Japan upholds “Mapplethorpe.”The New York Times, p. B2.
268.
VitranoV. J. (1994). Protecting cultural objects in an internal border-free EC: The EC directive and regulation for the protection and return of cultural objects. Fordham International Law Journal, 17, 1164-1201.
269.
VogelC. (2004, October27). National briefing: Illinois: F.B.I. seizes Picasso linked to Nazi looting. The New York Times, p. A13.
270.
VogelC. (2006a, August7). Returned Klimts to be sold at Christie’s. The New York Times, pp. B1, B7.
271.
VogelC. (2006b, October1). Swimming with famous dead sharks. The New York Times, p. AR28.
272.
VogelC. (2008a, September17). Bull market for Hirst in Sotheby’s 2-day sale. The New York Times, pp. E1, E5.
273.
VogelC. (2008b, January11). Ciao to a met prize returning to Italy. The New York Times, pp. E33, E35.
274.
VogelC. (2008c, September15). Damien Hirst’s next sensation: Thinking outside the dealer. The New York Times, pp. E1, E5.
275.
VogelC. (2008d, September16). Hirst’s art auction attracts plenty of bidders, despite financial turmoil. The New York Times, pp. E1, E4.
276.
VogelC. (2010, December21). Restored, then reconsidered, a met Velázquez is vindicated. The New York Times, pp. A1, A4.
277.
WaltonK. D. (1999). Stone unturned: The search for art stolen by the Nazis and the legal rules governing restitution of stolen art. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 9, 549-623.
278.
WangJ. (2009, October6). In China, a headless Mao is a game of cat and mouse. The New York Times, pp. C1, C5.
279.
WarneckeA. M. (1994). The art of applying the fair use doctrine: The postmodern-art challenge to the copyright law. Review of Litigation, 13, 685-764.
280.
WarrenS. F. (2001). Art: To fund or not to fund? That is still the question. Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 19, 149-181.
281.
WarringJ. (2005). Underground debates: The fundamental differences of opinion that thwart UNESCO’s progress in fighting the illicit trade in cultural property. Emory International Law Review, 19, 227-303.
282.
WeschlerL. (1999a). Boggs: A comedy of values. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
283.
WeschlerL. (1999b, May10). A contest of values. The New Yorker, pp. 52-55.
284.
WhiteR. (2008). Crimes against nature: Environmental criminology and ecological justice. Devon, UK: Willan.
285.
WhiteR. (2010). Globalisation and environmental harm. In WhiteR. (Ed.), Global environmental harm: Criminological perspectives (pp. 3-19). Devon, UK: Willan.
286.
WilkesN. B. (2001). Public responsibilities of private owners of cultural property: Toward a National Art Preservation Statute. Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts, 24, 177-211.
287.
WilliamsM. J. (2009). Framing art vandalism: A proposal to address violence against art. Brooklyn Law Review, 74, 581-623.
288.
WilsonJ. Q.KellingG. L. (1982, March). Broken windows: Police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly, pp. 29-38.
