Editor’s Introduction: Forensic Science and Criminal Justice

Abdollahi, M.K. ( 2002). Understanding police stress research. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 2, 1-24.

Badeaux, D. ( 2010). The DNA’s over there . . . right next to the jelly: The problems with the preservation of evidence in Texas. Texas Tech Administrative Law Review, 11, 333-354.

Bohan, T.L. , (2010). Strengthening forensic science: A way station on the journey to justice. Journal of Forensic Science, 55(1), 5-7.

Brauman, J. ( 2010). Science in court. Nature, 464(7287), 325.

Burke, R.J. , & Mikkelsen, A. ( 2005). Gender issues in policing: Do they matter? Women in Management Review, 20, 133-143.

Faigman, D.L. ( 2008). Anecdotal forensics, phrenology, and other abject lessons from the history of science. Hastings Law Journal, 59, 979-1000.

Fradella, H.F. ( 2006). Why judges should admit expert testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness identifications. Federal Courts Law Review, 2006(3), 2-29.

Garrett, B.L. , & Neufeld, P.J. ( 2009). Invalid forensic testimony and wrongful convictions. Virginia Law Review, 95, 1-97.

Giannelli, P.C. ( 1991). Criminal discovery, scientific evidence, and DNA. Vanderbilt Law Review, 44, 791-825.

Giannelli, P.C. ( 2004). Ake v. Oklahoma: The right to expert assistance in a post-Daubert, post-DNA world. Cornell Law Review, 89, 1305-1419.

Gillies, H. ( 1965). Murder in the west of Scotland. British Journal of Psychiatry, 111, 1087-1094.

Hughes, V. ( 2010). Science in court: Head case. Nature, 464, 340-342.

Johnson, S. , Cooper, C. , Cartwright, S. , Donald, I. , Taylor, P. , & Millet, C. ( 2005). The experience of work-related stress across occupations . Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20, 178-187.

King, W. , & Maguire, E. ( 2009). Assessing the performance of systems designed to process criminal forensic evidence. Forensic Science Policy and Management , 1(3), 159-170.

Lee, H.C. ( 1993). Forensic science and the law. Connecticut Law Review, 25, 1117-1125.

Murphy, E. ( 2007). The new forensics: Criminal justice, false certainty, and the second generation of scientific evidence. California Law Review, 95, 721-797.

Murphy, E. ( 2010). What "strengthening forensic science" today means for tomorrow: DNA exceptionalism and the 2009 NAS report. Law, Probability & Risk, 9, 7-24.

National Research Council, Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Science Community. (2009). Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Neufeld, P.J. ( 2005). The (near) irrelevance of Daubert to criminal justice and some suggestions for reform. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 107.

U.S. Senate, Committee on Appropriations. ( 2005). Departments of Commerce and Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill, 2006, 109th Congress, 1st Session, Report 088.

Torrey, E.F. ( 2006). Violence and schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 88, 3-4.

Whitman, G. , & Koppl, R. ( 2010). Rational bias in forensic science. Law, Probability & Risk, 9, 69-87.