The war on drugs has largely been waged in the southwestern border region of the United States. Five federal border districts (California South, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas West, and Texas South) alone are responsible for roughly one quarter of federal narcotics prosecutions annually. Narcotics cases make up roughly 30% of the federal criminal caseload each year, and the number of Hispanic and noncitizen defendants prosecuted in U.S. federal courts has risen steadily over the past two decades. In 1991, noncitizens comprised about 23% of persons prosecuted in federal courts; by 2009, nearly 45% of those prosecuted were noncitizens.This study examined judicial sentencing practices for federal narcotics offenders in these five southwestern border districts to explore the effect of citizenship status on sentence length. We also partition our analysis by district to enable assessment of variation in sentencing practices across these federal border districts.
Albonetti, C.A. ( 1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law and Society Review, 31, 789-822.
2.
Albonetti, C.A. ( 1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion . Social Problems, 38, 247-266.
3.
Anderson, A., & Spohn, C. ( 2009). Lawlessness in the federal sentencing process? A test for uniformity and consistency in sentence outcomes. Justice Quarterly, 27, 362-393.
4.
Barnes, C., & Kingsnorth, R. (1996). Race, drugs, and criminal sentencing: Hidden effects of the criminal law. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 39-55.
5.
Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004).
6.
Britt, C. ( 2000). Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisions . Justice Quarterly, 17, 707-732.
7.
Bushway, S.D., & Piehl, A.M. ( 2001). Judging judicial discretion: Legal factors and racial discrimination in sentencing. Law and Society Review, 35, 733-764.
8.
Curry, T.R., & Corral-Camacho, G. (2008). Sentencing young minority males for drug offenses: Testing for conditional effects between race/ethnicity, gender and age during the U.S. war on drugs. Punishment & Society, 10, 253-276.
9.
Daly, K. ( 1994). Gender, crime and punishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
Daudistel, H.C., Hosch, H.M., Holmes, M.D., & Graves, J.B. ( 1999). Effects of defendant ethnicity on juries dispositions of felony cases. Journal of Applied Psychology, 29, 317-336.
11.
Demuth, S. ( 2002). The effect of citizenship status on sentencing outcomes in drug cases. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 14, 271-275.
12.
Demuth, S., & Steffensmeier, S. (2004). Ethnicity effects on sentence outcomes in large urban courts: Comparisons among White, Black, and Hispanic defendants. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 994-1011.
13.
Doerner, J.K., & Demuth, S. ( 2010). The independent and joint effects of race/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts. Justice Quarterly, 27, 1-27.
14.
Engen, R.L., & Gainey, R.R. ( 2000). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. Criminology, 38, 1207-1229.
15.
Everett, R.S., & Wojtkiewicz, R. (2002). Difference, disparity, and race/ethnic bias in federal sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18, 189-211.
16.
Hagan, J., Levi, R., & Dinovitzer, R. (2008). The symbolic violence of the crime-immigration nexus: Migrant mythologies in the Americas. Criminology and Public Policy, 7, 95-112.
17.
Hartley, R.D. ( 2008). Sentencing reforms and the war on drugs: An analysis of sentence outcomes for narcotics offenders adjudicated in U.S. District Courts on the southwest border. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24, 437-461.
18.
Hartley, R.D., & Miller, J.M. ( 2010). Crack-ing the media myth: Reconsidering sentencing severity for cocaine offenders by drug type. Criminal Justice Review , 35, 67-89.
Holmes, M.D., & Daudistel, H.C. (1984). Race and justice in the Southwest: The sentencing of Anglo, Black and Hispanic defendants. Social Science Quarterly, 65, 265-277.
21.
Holmes, M.D., Hosch, H.M., Daudistel, H.C., Perez, D.A., & Graves, J.B. ( 1996). Ethnicity, legal resources, and felony dispositions in two southwestern jurisdictions. Justice Quarterly, 13, 11-30.
22.
Jaret, C. ( 1999). Troubled by newcomers: Anti-immigrant attitudes and action during two eras of mass immigration to the United States. Journal of American Ethnic History, 18, 9-39.
23.
Johnson, B.D. ( 2006). The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge- and county-level influences. Criminology, 44, 259-298.
24.
Johnson, B.D., & Betsinger, S. (2009). Punishing the "model" minority: Asian-American criminal sentencing outcomes in federal district courts. Criminology, 47, 1045-1090.
25.
Johnson, B.D., Ulmer, J.T., & Kramer, J. ( 2008). The social context of guideline circumvention: The case of federal district courts. Criminology, 46, 711-783.
26.
Kautt, P. ( 2002). Location, location, location: Interdistrict and intercircuit variation in sentencing outcomes for federal drug-trafficking offenses. Justice Quarterly, 19, 633-671.
27.
Kramer, J.H., & Ulmer, J. ( 1996). Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines. Justice Quarterly, 13, 401-425.
28.
Logue, M.A. ( 2009). The price of being Mexican: Sentencing disparities between noncitizen Mexican and non-Mexican Latinos in the federal courts. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 31, 423-445.
29.
Mustard, D.B. ( 2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. federal courts. Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 285-314.
30.
Nobiling, T., Spohn, C., & DeLone, M. (1998). A tale of two counties: Unemployment and sentence severity. Justice Quarterly, 15, 459-485.
31.
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. ( 1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859-866.
32.
Reedt, L., & Widico-Stroop, J. (2008). Changing face of federal criminal sentencing. Washington, DC: U.S. Sentencing Commission.
33.
Sabol, W.J., West, H.C., & Cooper, M. ( 2009). Prisoners in 2008. Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics .
34.
Savelsberg, J. ( 1992). Law that does not fit society: Sentencing guidelines as a neoclassical reaction to the dilemmas of substantivized law. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1346-1381.
35.
Sayad, A. ( 2004). The suffering of the immigrant. Cambridge , UK: Polity Press.
36.
Schmitt, G.R. ( 2007). Overview of federal criminal cases. Washington, DC: U.S. Sentencing Commission.
37.
The Sentencing Project. (2005). Racial disparity in sentencing: A review of the literature. Washington, DC: Author.
38.
Spitzer, S. ( 1975). Toward a Marxian theory of deviance. Social Problems, 22, 638-651.
39.
Spohn, C. ( 2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
40.
Spohn, C. ( 2005). Sentencing decisions in three U.S. district courts: Testing the assumption of uniformity in the federal sentencing process. Justice Research and Policy, 7, 1-27.
41.
Spohn, C., & Beichner, D. ( 2000). Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? A multi-site study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 149-184.
42.
Spohn, C., & DeLone, M. (2000). When does race matter? An analysis of the conditions under which race affects sentence severity. Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance, 2, 3-37.
43.
Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. ( 2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed Black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38, 281-306.
44.
Spohn, C., & Sample, L. ( 2010). The dangerous drug offender in federal court: Intersections of race, ethnicity and culpability. Crime & Delinquency . Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0011128708319928
45.
Steen, S., Engen, R.L., & Gainey, R.R. ( 2005). Images of danger and culpability: Racial stereotyping, case processing, and criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43, 435-468.
46.
Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. ( 2006). Does gender modify the effects of race-ethnicity on criminal sanctioning? Sentences for male and female, White, Black, and Hispanic defendants . Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 241-261.
47.
Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. ( 2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review , 65, 705-729.
48.
Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. ( 1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-797.
49.
Sudnow, D. ( 1965). Normal crimes: Sociological features of the penal code in a public defender’s office. Social Problems, 12, 255-276.
50.
Tillyer, R., & Hartley, R.D. ( 2010). Driving racial profiling research forward: Learning lessons from sentencing research. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 657-665.
51.
Tonry, M. ( 1995). Malign neglect. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
52.
Ulmer, J.T. ( 2005). The localized uses of federal sentencing guidelines in four U.S. district courts: Evidence of processual order. Symbolic Interaction, 28, 255-279.
53.
Ulmer, J.T., Eisenstein, J., & Johnson, B.D. ( 2010). Trial penalties in federal sentencing: Extra-guidelines factors and district variation. Justice Quarterly, 27, 560-592.
54.
Ulmer, J.T., & Johnson, B. ( 2004). Sentencing in context: A multi-level analysis. Criminology, 42, 137-177.
55.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2008). National drug threat assessment 2009. Washington, DC: National Drug Intelligence Center, U.S. Department of Justice.
56.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2010). National drug threat assessment 2010. Washington, DC: National Drug Intelligence Center, U.S. Department of Justice.
57.
U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2004). Fifteen years of guidelines sentencing: An assessment of how well the federal criminal justice system is achieving the goals of sentencing reform. Washington, DC: Author.
58.
U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2009). Federal sentencing guidelines manual. Washington, DC: Author.
59.
U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2010). Demographic differences in federal sentencing practices: An update of the Booker report’s multivariate regression analysis. Washington, DC: Author.
60.
United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).
61.
United States v. Gomez, 797 F.2d 417 (7th Cir. 1986).
62.
Wu, J., & Spohn, C. ( 2010). Interdistrict disparity in sentencing in three U.S. district courts. Crime & Delinquency, 56, 290-322.
