Despite a substantial empirical literature on what works in offender treatment, programs based on common sense dominate the corrections landscape. We explain how commonsense approaches have led to correctional quackery (CQ) and draw on chaos theory to show that there is actually an underlying order to what appears to be a literature in complete disorder. Specifically, it is proposed that the law of fartcatchers can account for a significant amount of the CQ that occurs in corrections. A brief history of the conditions that led to the development of the law is provided, and we trace how it has evolved over time. Finally, the long-term viability of the law and whether its influence can be mitigated is discussed.
Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. ( 2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson .
2.
Andrews, D.A., Dowden, C., & Gendreau, P. ( 1999). Clinically relevant and psychologically informed approaches to reduced re-offending: A meta-analytic study of human service, risk, need, responsivity, and other concerns in justice contexts. Unpublished manuscript.
3.
Andrews, D.A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R.D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F.T. ( 1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically-relevant and psychologically-informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
4.
Ax, R.K., & Morgan, R. ( 2002). Internship training opportunities in correctional psychology: A comparison of settings. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 332-347.
5.
Bourgon, G., & Armstrong, B. ( 2005). Transferring the principles of effective treatment into a "real world" prison setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 32, 3-25.
6.
Bryson, B. ( 1994). Made in America. London: Minerva.
7.
Cerrato, S. ( 1982). Politically appointed administrators: An empirical perspective . Federal Probation, 46, 22-29.
8.
Cullen, F.T. ( 2002). Rehabilitation and treatment programs. In J. Q. Wilson & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime: Public policies for crime control (pp. 253-289). Oakland, CA: ICS Press.
9.
Cullen, F.T. ( 2007). Making rehabilitation corrections guiding paradigm. Criminology & Public Policy, 6, 717-727.
10.
Cullen, F.T., Blevins, K.R., Trager, J.S., & Gendreau, P. ( 2005). The rise & fall of boot camps: A case study in common-sense corrections. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 40, 53-70.
11.
Cullen, F.T., Fisher, B.S., & Applegate, B.K. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. In Michael Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 27, pp. 1-79). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Cullen, F.T., & Gendreau, P. ( 2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In J. Horney (Ed.), National Institute of Justice criminal justice 2000: Changes in decision making and discretion in the criminal justice system (pp. 109-175). Washington, DC: Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
13.
Cullen, F.T., & Gendreau, P. ( 2001). From nothing works to what works: Changing professional ideology in the 21st century. The Prison Journal, 81, 313-338.
14.
Cullen, F.T., Wright, J.P., & Applegate, B.K. (1996). Control in the community: The limits of reform? In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional interventions that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 69-116). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Davidson, W., Redner, R., Blakely, C., Mitchell, C., & Emshoff, J. ( 1987). Diversion of juvenile offender: An experimental comparison . Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 68-75.
16.
Donald Savoie on the crisis of Canadian government. ( 2008, May 20). TorontoGlobe and Mail, pp. A1-A7.
17.
Dunning, D., Griffin, D.W., Milojkovic, J.D., & Ross, L. ( 1990). The overconfidence effect in social prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 568-581.
18.
Erwin, B.J. ( 1986). Turning up the heat on probationers in Georgia. Federal Probation, 50, 17-24.
19.
Farabee, D. ( 2005). Rethinking rehabilitation: Why can’t we reform criminals?Washington, DC: AEI Press .
20.
Flores, A.W., Russell, A.L., Latessa, E.J., & Travis, L.F., III (2005). Evidence of professionalism or quackery: Measuring practitioner awareness of risk/need factors and effective treatment strategies. Federal Probation, 69, 9-14.
21.
Gendreau, P. ( 1996). The principles of effective intervention with offenders . In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 117-130). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Gendreau, P. ( 2000). 1998 Margaret Mead award address: Rational policies for reforming offenders. In M. McMahon (Ed.), Assessment to assistance: Programs for women in community corrections (pp. 329-338). Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.
23.
Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D.A. ( 2001). The Correctional Program Assessment Inventory-2000 (CPAI-2000) . Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada: University of New Brunswick.
24.
Gendreau, P., & Goggin, C. ( 1991). Evaluation of Correctional Services of Canada substance abuse programs (Research Report No. 16). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Research and Statistics Branch , Correctional Services of Canada.
25.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Cullen, F.T. ( 1999). The effects of prison sentences on recidivism (Cat. # J42-87/1999E Public Works & Government Services Canada). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Corrections research and Development and Aboriginal Policy Branch, Solicitor General Canada .
26.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., Cullen, F.T., & Paparozzi, M. ( 2002). The common sense revolution and correctional policy. In J. McGuire (Ed.), Offender rehabilitation & treatment: Effective programs & policies to reduce re-offending (pp. 360-386). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
27.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., French, S., & Smith, P. ( 2006). Practicing psychology in correctional settings: "What works" in reducing criminal behavior. In A. K. Hess & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), The handbook of forensic psychology (3rd ed., pp. 722-750) New York: John Wiley.
28.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. ( 1999). The forgotten issue in effective correctional treatment: Program implementation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 180-187.
29.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. ( 2001a). Implementing correctional interventions in the "real" world. In G. A. Bernfeld, A. W. Leschied, & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Inside the "black box" in corrections (pp. 247-268). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
30.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. ( 2001b). Obstacles to effective correctional program delivery . In L. L. Motiuk & R. C. Serin (Eds.), Compendium 2000 on effective correctional programs (pp. 37-46). Ottawa, Ontario , Canada: Correctional Service of Canada, solicitor General of Canada.
Gendreau, P., & Ross, R.R. ( 1987). Revivification of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 80’s . Justice Quarterly, 4, 349-407.
33.
Gendreau, P., & Smith, P. ( 2007). Influencing the "people who count": Some perspectives on the reporting of meta-analytic results for prediction and treatment outcomes with offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1536-1559.
34.
Gendreau, P., Smith, P., & French, S. ( 2006). The theory of effective correctional intervention: Empirical status & future direction. In F. Cullen , J. Wright, & M. Coleman (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 419-446). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Press.
35.
Gleick, J. ( 1987). Chaos: Making a new science. London : Cardinal.
36.
Goggin, C., & Gendreau, P. ( 2006). The implementation of quality services in offender rehabilitation programs. In C. R. Hollin & E. J. Palmer (Eds.), Offending behaviour programmes, development, application, & controversies (pp.209-246). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
37.
Hague, W. ( 1999, October). The common sense revolution. Speech made at the Conservative Party Conference, Blackpool, UK .
38.
Hoge, R., Leschied, A., & Andrews, D.A. ( 1993). An investigation of young offenders services in the province of Ontario: A report of the repeat offender project. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Ministry of Community and Social Services .
39.
Hunt, M. ( 1997). How science takes stock: The story of meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage.
40.
Hunt, M. ( 1999). The new know-nothings: The political foes of the scientific study of human nature. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
41.
Ingstrup, O., & Crookall, P. ( 1988). The three pillars of public management: Applications in corrections. Corrections Management Quarterly, 2, 1-9.
42.
Jack. L., & Bellevance, J.D. (2001, February 7). Audit slams Ottawa’s cronyism. The National Post, pp. A1, A6.
43.
Johnson, W.W., Bennett, K., & Flanagan, T.J. (1997). Getting tough on prisoners: Results from the National Corrections Executive Survey, 1995 . Crime & Delinquency, 43, 24-41.
44.
Krugman, P. ( 2009, January 1). Bigger than Bush. New York Times. Retrieved July 24, 2009, from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/02/opinion/02krugman.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=Bigger%20than%20Bush&st=cse
45.
Latessa, E.J., Cullen, F.T., & Gendreau, P. ( 2002). Beyond correctional quackery: Professionalism & the possibility of effective treatment. Federal Probation, 66, 43-49.
46.
Latessa, E.J., & Holsinger, A.M. (1998). The importance of evaluating correctional programs: Assessing outcome and quality. Corrections Management Quarterly, 2, 22-29.
47.
Latessa, E.J., & Holsinger, A.M. (1999). Evaluation of the Ohio Department of Youth Service’s community corrections facilities (CCFs) (Subgrant number 96-JJ-SII-0697). Cincinnati, OH: Division of Criminal Justice.
48.
Light, S.C., & Newman, T.K. ( 1992). Awareness and use of social science research among executive and administrative staff members of state correctional agencies. Justice Quarterly, 9, 299-324.
49.
Lilienfield, S.O. ( 2002). When works collide: Social science, politics, and the Rind et al. (1998) child sexual abuse meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 57, 176-188.
50.
Lipsey, M.W. ( 1999). Can rehabilitative programs reduce the recidivism of juvenile offenders? An inquiry into the effectiveness of practical programs . Virginia Journal of Social Policy and Law, 6, 611-641.
51.
Lipsey, M.W. ( 2009). The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta-analytic overview. Victims and Offenders, 4, 124-147.
52.
Lowencamp, C.T., Latessa, E.J., & Smith, P. ( 2006). Does correctional program quality really matter: The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 201-220.
53.
Martin, L. ( 2008, October 30). Will the new cabinet signal a new way?TorontoGlobe & Mail, p. A23.
54.
Martinson, R. ( 1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform . Public Interest, 35, 22-54.
55.
McGuire, J. ( 2002). Integrating findings from research reviews. In J. McGuire (Ed.), Offender rehabilitation and treatment. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
56.
McGuire, J.Bilby, C.A.L., Hatcher, R.M., Hollin, C.R., Hounsome, J., & Palmer, E.J. ( 2008). Evaluation of structured cognitive-behavioural treatment programmes in reducing criminal recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 4, 21-40.
57.
Mintzberg, H. ( 2003). Managers not MBAs: A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler.
58.
Montgomery, B. ( 2002). The common (non)sense revolution: The decline of progress & democracy in Ontario. Creemore, ON: Mad River.
59.
Mooney, C. ( 2005). The Republican war on science. New York: Basic books.
60.
Newbold, G. ( 2008). Another one bites the dust: Recent initiatives in correctional reform in New Zealand. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 41, 384-401.
61.
Nisbett, R.E., & Ross, L. ( 1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Palmer, T. ( 1975). Martinson revisited. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 12, 133-152.
64.
Paparozzi, M., & Lowencamp, C. ( 2000). To be or not to be-a profession-that is the question for corrections. Corrections Management Quarterly, 4, 9-16.
65.
Roberts, J. ( 2000). Corrections in Canada: Public knowledge and public opinion . In J. Winterdyk (Ed.), Corrections in Canada: Social reaction to crime (pp. 49-64). Scarborough, Ontario, Canada: Prentice Hall.
66.
Savoie, D.J. ( 1999). Governing from the centre: The concentration of power in Canadian politics. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
67.
Savoie, D.J. ( 2008). Court government and the collapse of accountability in Canada and the U.K. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
68.
Shulman, S. ( 2006). Undermining science: Suppression and distortion in the Bush administration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
69.
Simourd, D.J., & Wormith, J.S. ( 1995). Criminal justice education and training: A survey of Canadian graduate schools of psychology. Canadian Psychology , 36, 213-232.
70.
Smith, P., & Gendreau, P. ( 2008). A longitudinal examination of inmate behaviour and program activities on institutional adjustment and recidivism. Manuscript submitted for publication.
71.
Smith, P., Gendreau, P., & Swartz, K. ( 2009). Validating the principles of effective intervention: A systematic review of the contributions of meta-analysis in the field of corrections. Victims and Offenders, 4, 148-169.
72.
Smith, P., Goggin C., & Gendreau, P. ( 2002). The effects of prison sentences and intermediate sanctions on recidivism: General effects and individual differences (User Report 2002-01) . Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Solicitor General Canada.
73.
Snook, B. ( 2008). Introduction to special issue: Pseudoscientific policing practices and beliefs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1211-1214.
74.
Starobin, P. ( 1997). Word warriors. The Washingtonian, 32, 101-103.
75.
Stewart-Robertson, J.C. ( 2004). Scottish common sense realism. Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada: Department of Humanities, University of New Brunswick.
76.
Struchoff, D.R. ( 1978). Deprofessionalizing corrections is bad business. Offender Rehabilitation, 2, 333-338.
77.
Vaughn, M. ( 1994). Boot camps. The Grapevine, 2, 2.
78.
White, G. ( 1998). Shorter measures: The changing ministerial career in Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 41, 369-394.
