Racial profiling is among the most important challenges to the legitimacy of law enforcement agencies in the United States. In response to concerns about racial profiling, police departments have taken a number of approaches to address the threat to legitimacy that racial profiling poses. Among the most common approaches, and one that citizens, policy makers, and scholars have all supported, is the implementation of data collection programs designed to document the situational characteristics of traffic stops. The consensus is that data collection will provide an empirical basis for determining whether race-based or other biased policing is occurring. This article argues that this approach is limited in its effectiveness. It is argued that police interest in documenting and preventing racial profiling is driven by concerns about developing and maintaining the perception of responsiveness to the public. Police strategy, ironically, uses technology and science to enhance institutional legitimacy.
Alpert, G.P., MacDonald, J.M., & Dunham, R.G. (2005). Police suspicion and discretionary decision making during traffic stops. Criminology, 43, 407-434.
2.
American Civil Liberties Union. (2006). Racial profiling highlights. Retrieved November 17, 2006, from http://www.aclu.org/racialjustice/racialprofiling/24164res20060215.html#attach
3.
Barlow, D., & Barlow, M.H. (1999). A political economy of community policing. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 22, 646-674.
4.
Bittner, E. (1967). The functions of police in modern society. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.
5.
Black, D. (1980). The manners and customs of the police. New York: Academic Press.
6.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.
8.
Crank, J., & Langworthy, R. (1992). An institutional perspective of policing. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 338-363.
9.
Della Fave, R.L. (1980). The meek shall not inherit the Earth: Self-evaluation and the legitimacy of stratification. American Sociological Review, 45, 955-971.
10.
Engel, R.S. (2004). Citizens' perceptions of distributive and procedural injustice during traffic stops with police. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42, 445-481.
11.
Engel, R.S., & Calnon, J.M. (2004a). Comparing benchmark methodologies for police-citizen contacts: Traffic stop data collection for the Pennsylvania state police. Police Quarterly,7, 97-125.
12.
Engel, R.S., & Calnon, J.M. (2004b). Examining the influence of drivers' characteristics during traffic stops with police: Results from a national survey. Justice Quarterly, 21, 49-90.
13.
Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction. New York: Vintage.
14.
Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (2nd ed.). New York: Vintage.
15.
Fridell, L. (2005). Understanding race data from traffic stops: A stakeholder's guide. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
16.
Fridell, L., Lunney, R., Diamond, D., & Kubu, B. (2005). Racially biased policing: A principled response, report/evaluation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services .
17.
Fridell, L., & Scott, M. (2006). Law enforcement agency responses to racially biased policing and the perceptions of its practice. In R. G. Dunham & G. P. Alpert (Eds.), Critical issues in policing (5th ed., pp.304-321). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
18.
Fyfe, J.J. (1979). Administrative interventions on police shooting discretion: An empirical examination. Journal of Criminal Justice, 7, 309-323.
19.
Gaines, L.K. (2006). An analysis of traffic stop data in Riverside, California. Police Quarterly,9, 210-233.
20.
Gallup. (1999). Gallup poll social audit on Black/White relations in the U.SPrinceton, NJ : Author.
21.
Geiger-Oneto, S., & Phillips, S. (2003). Driving while Black: The role of race, sex, and social status. Journal of Ethnicity and Criminal Justice, 1, 1-25.
22.
International Association of Chiefs of Police. ( 2006). Protecting civil rights: A leadership guide for state, local and tribal law enforcement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services .
23.
Katz, C.M. (2001). The establishment of a police gang unit: An examination of organizational and environmental factors. Criminology, 39, 37-75.
24.
Kelling, G.L., & Moore, M.H. (1988). The evolving strategy of policing. In Perspectives on policing, Number 4 (pp. 1-14). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
25.
Klockars, C.B. (1991). The rhetoric of community policing. In J. R. Greene & S. D. Mastrofski (Eds.), Community policing: Rhetoric or reality (pp. 239-258). New York: Praeger.
26.
Lange, J.E., Johnson, M.B., & Voas, R.B. (2005). Testing the racial profiling hypothesis for seemingly disparate traffic stops on the New Jersey Turnpike. Justice Quarterly, 22, 193-224.
27.
Lipset, S.M. (1981). Political man: The social bases of politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28.
Lundman, R.J., & Kaufman, R.L. (2003). Driving while Black: Effects of race, ethnicity, and gender on citizen self-reports of traffic stops and police actions. Criminology, 41, 195-220.
29.
Luntz, F. (2007). Words that work: It's not what you say, it's what people hear. New York: Hyperion .
30.
Manning, P.K. (1991). Community policing as a drama of control. In J. R. Greene & S. D. Mastrofski (Eds.), Community policing: Rhetoric or reality (pp. 27-45). New York: Praeger .
31.
Manning, P.K., & Singh, M.P. (1997). Violence and hyperviolence: The rhetoric and practice of community policing. Sociological Spectrum, 17, 339-361.
32.
Mastrofski, S.D. (2004). Controlling street-level police discretion. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 100-118.
33.
Mastrofski, S.D., Ritti, R.R., & Snipes, J.B. (1994). Expectancy theory and police productivity in DUI enforcement. Law & Society Review, 28, 113-148.
34.
Meehan, A.J., & Ponder, M.C. (2002). Race and place: The ecology of racial profiling African American motorists. Justice Quarterly, 19, 399-430.
35.
Novak, K.J. (2004). Disparity and racial profiling in traffic enforcement . Police Quarterly,7, 65-96.
36.
Platt, T. (1982). The iron fist and the velvet glove: An analysis of the US police (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Synthesis.
37.
Reitzel, J.D., Rice, S.K., & Piquero, A.R. (2004). Lines and shadows: Perceptions of racial profiling and the Hispanic experience. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32, 607-616.
38.
Rice, S.K., & Piquero, A.R. (2005). Perceptions of discrimination and justice in New York City. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies &Management, 28, 98-117.
39.
Rice, S.K., Reitzel, J.D., & Piquero, A.R. (2005). Shades of brown: Perceptions of racial profiling and the intra-ethnic differential. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 3, 47-79.
40.
Rojek, J., Rosenfeld, R., & Decker, S. (2004). The influence of driver's race on traffic stops in Missouri. Police Quarterly,7, 126-147.
41.
Schultz, M., & Winthrow, B.L. (2004). Racial profiling and organizational change. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15, 462-485.
42.
Schwartz, M.D., & Friedrichs, D.O. (1994). Postmodern thought and criminological discontent: New metaphors for understanding violence. Criminology, 32, 221-246.
43.
Skogan, W.G., & Meares, T.L. (2004). Lawful policing. ANNALS of theAmerican Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 66-83.
44.
Smith, M.R., & Petrocelli, M. (2001). Racial profiling? A multivariate analysis of police traffic stop data. Police Quarterly,4, 4-27.
45.
Sunshine, J. & Tyler, T.R.The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513-547.
46.
Tyler, T.R., & Wakslak, C.J. (2004). Profiling and the legitimacy of the police: Procedural justice, attributions of motive, and the acceptance of social authority. Criminology, 42, 13-42.
47.
Warren, P., Tomaskovic-Devey, D., Smith, W., Zingraff, M., & Mason, M. (2006). Driving while Black: Bias processes and racial disparity in police stops. Criminology, 44, 709-738.
48.
Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S.A. (2002). Perceptions of racial profiling: Race, class, and personal experience. Criminology, 40, 435-456.
49.
Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S.A. (2004). Race and perceptions of police misconduct. Social Problems, 51, 305-325.
50.
Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S.A. (2005). Racially biased policing: Determinants of citizen perceptions. Social Forces, 83, 1009-1030.
51.
Williams, H., & Murphy, P.V. (1988). The evolving strategy of policing: A minority view. Perspectives on policing, Number 13 (pp. 1-16). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
52.
Wilson, G., Dunham, R., & Alpert, G. (2005). Prejudice in police profiling: Assessing an overlooked aspect in prior research. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 896-909.
