In the post—9/11 period, the United States government employed alternate methods to deal with those accused of pursuing terrorism or aiding the nation's enemies. In an effort to thwart terror attacks, officials employed both civilian and military authority to investigate, apprehend, detain, and prosecute terror suspects. At first the Bush administration was granted considerable deference by the public and other branches of government on a wide variety of measures, including detainments. Eventually, both the courts and Congress reasserted themselves to limit the broad authority that the administration initially wielded over suspected terrorists. In particular, the ability of the military to detain American citizens in most circumstances was all but eliminated, and its near complete authority over noncitizens was significantly restricted as well.
Ackerman, B. (2006). Preserving civil liberties in an age of terrorism . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
Authorization for Use of Military Force, 115Stat. 224 (2001).
3.
Burns, R. (March 6, 2007). Pentagon closes door on terror hearings . Associated Press. Available from http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/G/GUANTANAMO_PRISONERS?SITE=ALANN&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
4.
Chang, N. (2001). The USA PATRIOT Act: What's so patriotic about trampling on the Bill of Rights? New York: Center for Constitutional Rights. Available from http://www.ccr-ny.org/v2/reports/docs/USA_PATRIOT_ACT.pdf
5.
Cohen, A. (2006, September 14). Ten legal landmarks since 9/11. CBS News Online. Available from http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/09/14/opinion/courtwatch/printable2007520.shtml
6.
Combatant Status Review Tribunal Hearing, ISN 10024. (March 10, 2007). Verbatim Transcript, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Available from http://www.defenselink.mil/news/transcript_ISN10024.pdf
7.
Combatant Status Review Tribunal Summary. (2005). Available from http://defenselink.mil/news/Mar2005/d200050329csrt.pdf
8.
Denbeaux, M., & Denbeaux, J. (2006). No-hearing hearings. CRST: The modern habeas corpus ? Unpublished manuscript, Seton Hall University Law School , Newark, NJ. Available from http://law.shu.edu/news/final_no_hearing_hearings_report.pdf
9.
Department of Defense. (March 6, 2007). News release: Guantanamo Bay 2006 administrative review board status results . Available from http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=10582
10.
Department of Defense Military Commission Order No. 1, 66 C.F.R. 57833 (2002).
Geneva Convention (III) Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, 6 U.S.T. 3316, T.I.A.S. No. 3364 (1949).
22.
Golden, T. (2005, December 23). The advocate: A junior aide had a big role in terror policy. The New York Times, p. A1.
23.
Greenhouse, L. (2006, June 30). Justices, 5-3 broadly reject Bush plan to try detainees; accompanying charts. The New York Times , p. A1.
24.
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 126 S. Ct. 2749; 165 L. Ed. 2d 723, 2006 U.S. LEXIS 5185 (2006).
25.
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004).
26.
Harris, R. (2006, October 10). Kevin James and the JIS conspiracy . PBS Frontline. Available from http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/////enemywithin/reality/james.html
27.
Humanitarian Law Project v. United States Department of Treasury, Central District of California, Case No. CV 05-08047 ABC (RMCx) (2006).
28.
Jose Padilla. (2006). Jurist. Available from http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/currentawareness/padilla.php
29.
Krikorian, G. & Schmitt, R. (2006, October 12). Videos lead to treason charge. Los Angeles Times, p. A1.
30.
Levin, B. (1999). Patriot movement: Past, present, and future. In H. W. Kushner (Ed.), The future of terrorism: Violence in the new millennium (pp. 97-131). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Lichtblau, E. (2006, September 4). Study finds sharp drop in the number of terrorism cases prosecuted. The New York Times, p. A9.
32.
Linzer, D., & Kessler, G. (2006, September 8). Decision to move detainees resolved two-year debate among Bush advisers. The Washington Post, p. A1.
33.
Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI). ( 2006, July 8). Al qaeda film on the first anniversary of the London bombing. Transcript available from http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1186
34.
Military Commissions Act, Pub. L. No. 109-366, 120 Stat. 2600 (2006).
35.
Military Order (2001, November 16). Detention, Treatment, and Trial of Certain Non-Citizens in the War Against Terrorism, 66Fed. Reg.57833.
36.
Moschella, W. (2005). Report from assistant attorney general: Office of Legislative Affairs to Speaker of the House Hastert. Available from http://l49.101.1.32/oipr/readingroom/2005fisa-ltr.pdf
37.
Mueller, R. (2002). Remarks at the StanfordLaw School, Stanford, CA.
38.
Odah v. United States, 542 U.S. 466 (2004).
39.
Office of the Inspector General. (2007). The Department of Justice's internal controls over terrorism reporting. Available from http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/reports/plus/a0720/final.pdf
40.
Padilla v. Hanft, No. 05-533 (2005).
41.
Quan, D., Fisher, M., & Reddy, S. (2006, October 12). Gadahn is traitor, U.S. says. Riverside PressEnterprise, p. A1.
42.
Rasul v. Bush, 542 U.S. 466 (2004).
43.
Recent spy cases. (2002). CNN.com. Available from http://www.cnn.com/interactive/us/0102/spy.cases/frameset.exclude.html
44.
Richey, W. (2006, October 19). Torture of detainees? No. “Coercion”? It depends. The Christian Science Monitor. Available from http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/1019/p02s01-usju.html
45.
Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426 (2004).
46.
Shrader, K. (2007, March 21). Red cross says detainees reported abuse . Associated Press. Available from http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6495382,00.html
47.
Serrano, R. (December 17, 2006). Padilla terror case gets closer look . Los Angeles Times. Available from http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-padilla17dec17,1,1639865.story
48.
Siemaszko, C. (2002, July 12). Most 9/11 detainees were freed. New York Daily News, p. B18.
49.
Trac Reports. (2006). Criminal terrorism enforcement in the United States during the five years since the 9/11/01 attacks. Syracuse, NY: Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse.
50.
Trac Reports. (2007). Terrorism enforcement: International, domestic and financial. Syracuse, NY: Transactional Records Clearing House. Available from http://trac.syr.edu/tracreports/terrorism/177/#T1
51.
Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (1951).
52.
Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, Pub. L. 107-56, 115 Stat. 272 (2001). USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act, Pub. L. No. 109-177 (2006).
53.
Volokh, E. (2006, October 14). The case for treason. Los Angeles Times, p. B17.
54.
White, J. (2006, September 7). New rules for interrogation forbid use of harsh tactics. The Washington Post, p. A1.
55.
Yoo, J. ( 2006). An insider's account of the war on terror. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press.
56.
Zakaria, F. (2006, December 17). The enemy within. The New York Times Sunday Book Review. Available from http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/17/books/review/Zakaria.t.html?ref=review
