There is an ongoing debate about the wisdom of allowing employers to use criminal history records in the employment screening process. The debate typically places the rights of individuals with criminal history records against the rights of employers concerned about hiring workers who might be inclined to commit crime in the workplace. The author argues that such a characterization of the debate is too narrow. In particular, this article uses a simple economic analysis to argue that employer access to criminal history records might actually increase the wages of individuals without criminal history records and may, moreover, increase average market wages for groups of individuals with large number of convicted individuals, such as Black males. This theory is tested by exploiting cross-state variation in policies governing employer access to criminal history records.
Aigner, A., & Cain, G. (1977). Statistical theories of discrimination in the labor market. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 30, 175-187.
2.
Belair, P. (1989). Public access to criminal history record information (Criminal Justice Information Series NCJ-111458). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
3.
Briggs, S., Thanner, M., Bushway, S., Taxman, F., & Van Brakle, M. (2004). Private providers of criminal history records: Do you get what you pay for? (Working paper). College Park: University of Maryland.
4.
Burton, V. Jr., Cullen, F., & Travis, L., III. (1987). The collateral consequences of a felony conviction: A national study of state statutes. Federal Probation, 51, 52-60.
5.
Bushway, S. (1996). The impact of a criminal history record on access to legitimate employment. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
6.
Bushway, S. (1998). The impact of an arrest on the job stability of young White American men. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 454-479.
7.
Bushway, S., & Reuter, P. (2002). Labor markets and crime risk factors. In L. Sherman, D. Farrington, B. Welsh, & D. MacKenzie (Eds.), Evidence-based crime prevention (pp. 198-240). New York: Rutledge.
8.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1990). Policy guidance on the consideration of arrest records in employment decisions under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1982).
9.
Fagan, J., & Freeman, R. B. (1999). Crime and work. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 25, pp. 113-178). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Freeman, R. (1991). Crime and the employment of disadvantaged youth, National Bureau of Economic Research working paper. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10, 3-21.
11.
Grogger, J. (1995). The effect of arrests on the employment and earnings of young men. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 51-71.
12.
Hahn, J. (1991). Pre-employment information services: Employers beware?Employee Relations Law Journal, 17(1), 45-69.
13.
Holzer, H. (1996). What employers want: Job prospects for less-educated workers. New York: Sage.
14.
Holzer, H., Raphael, S., & Stoll, M. (in press). Will employers hire ex-offenders? Employer preferences, background checks, and their determinants. In M. Patillo-McCoy, D. Weiman, & B. Western (Eds.), The impact of incarceration on families and communities. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
15.
Hulsey, L. (1990). Attitudes of employers with respect to hiring released prisoners. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Mankato State University, Mankato, MN.
16.
Langan, P. A., & Levin, D. J. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994 (p. 16). Washington, DC: U.S. Deparment of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
17.
Laudon, K. (1986). Dossier society: Value choices in the design of national information systems. New York: Columbia University Press.
18.
Legal Action Center. (2004). After prison: Roadblocks to reentry: A report on state legal barriers facing people with criminal records. New York: Author. Retrieved from http://www.lac.org/lac/index.php
19.
Lott, J. (1992). Do we punish high-income criminals too heavily?Economic Inquiry, 30, 583-608.
20.
Nagin, D., & Waldfogel, J. (1995). The effects of criminality and conviction on the labor market status of young British offenders. International Review of Law and Economics, 15, 109-126.
21.
Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 937-975.
22.
Sampson, R., & Laub, J. (1993). Crime in the making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Schwartz, R., & Skolnick, J. (1962). Two studies of legal stigma. Social Problems, 10, 133-138.
24.
Scott, C. (1987, October). Negligent hiring: Guilt by association. Personnel Administrator, pp. 32-34.
25.
SEARCH, Inc., The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics. (2000). Compendium of state privacy and security legislation: Overview. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
26.
Waldfogel, J. (1994). The effect of criminal conviction on income and the “trust reposed in the workmen.”Journal of Human Resources, 29, 62-81.
27.
Williams, J., & Sickles, R. (2002). An analysis of the crime as work model: Evidence from the 1958 Philadelphia Birth Cohort study. Journal of Human Resources, 37, 479-509.
