Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is commonly used in criminal justice research, but the results are rarely embraced with great confidence. The CBA method that is routinely applied in crime research is not a well-developed empirical method but rather an intuitive extension of economic theory appended onto an impact evaluation. Small errors resulting from common problems in evaluation, such as small sample sizes and selection effects, are magnified in the CBA framework. In particular, rare events with large costs or benefits can obscure all other program effects. Even with careful attention to these issues, CBA conducted in conjunction with an impact evaluation will, as a rule, omit critical information. Because public safety is at the core of crime control, it is critical that CBA captures the effects of crime-control policy at the community level. Moving the unit of analysis from individual to community level effects may resolve these problems.
Adler, M. D., & Posner, E. A. (1999). Rethinking cost-benefit analysis. John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper (No. 72, pp. 1-92). Chicago: University of Chicago.
2.
Aos, S., Phipps, P., Barnoski, R., & Lieb, R. (2001, May). The comparative costs and benefits of programs to reduce crime (Version 4.0). Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
3.
Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169-217.
4.
Becker, G. S. (2001). Cost-benefit analysis: Definition, justification, and comment on conference paper. In M. D. Adler & E. A. Posner (Eds.), Cost-benefit analysis: Legal, economic and philosophical perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Boardman, A. E., Greenberg, D. H., Vining, A. L., & Weimer, D. L. (2001). Cost-benefit analysis; concepts and practice (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
Brent, R.J. (1996, February). Applied cost-benefit analysis. London: Edward Elgar.
7.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
8.
Cartwright, W. S. (2000). Cost-benefit analysis of drug treatment services: Review of the literature. Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, 3, 11-26.
9.
Cavanagh, D.P.,& Kleiman, M.A.R. (1990). Cost-benefit analysis of prison cell construction and alternative sanctions (Report prepared for the National Institute of Justice). Cambridge, MA: BOTEC Analysis Corporation.
10.
Cohen, M. A. (2000, July). Measuring the costs and benefits of crime and justice. Measurement and analysis of crime and justice: Criminal justice, (Vol. 4, NCJ 182411). Washington, DC: Justice Department.
11.
Dhiri, S., & Brand, S. (2001). Analysis of costs and benefits: Guidance for evaluators (Crime Reduction Programme Guidance Note 1). London: Research and Statistics Directorate.
12.
Gramlich, E. (1990). A guide to benefit cost analysis. New York: Prentice Hall.
13.
Layard, R., & Glaister, S. (1996). Cost-benefit analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
McCollister, K. E., & French, M. T. (2004). The relative contribution of outcome domains in the total economic benefit of addiction interventions: A review of first findings. Addiction, 99(1), 131.
15.
Miller, T. R., Cohen, M. A., & Wiersma, B. (1996). Victim costs and consequences: A new look (National Institute of Justice research report). Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
16.
Mohr, L. B. (1995). Impact analysis for program evaluation (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Nas, T. F. (1996). Cost-benefit analysis: Theory and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Railton, P. (1990). Benefit-cost analysis as a source of information about welfare. In P. B. Hammond & E. Coppock (Eds.), Valuing health risks, costs, and benefits for environmental decision making (pp. 55-82). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19.
Rajkumar, A. S., & French, M. T. (1997). Drug abuse, crime costs, and the economic benefits of treatment. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 13(3), 291-323.
20.
Roman, J., & Farrell, G. (2002, June). Cost-benefit analysis for crime prevention: Opportunity costs, routine savings, and crime externalities. In N. Tilley (Ed.), Evaluation for crime prevention (Vol. 14, pp. 53-92). New York: Criminal Justice Press.
21.
Rothenberg, J. (1975). Cost-benefit analysis: A methodological exposition. In M. Guttentag & E. L. Struenig (Ed.), Handbook of evaluation research (Vol. 2, pp. 55-88). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
Sagoff, M. (1994). At the shrine of Our Lady Fatima or why all political questions are not economic. In L. P. Pojman (Ed.), Environmental ethics: Readings in theory and applications (pp. 443-450). Boston: James and Bartlett.
23.
Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising: A report to the United States Congress. College Park, MD: Department of Criminal Justice & Criminology, University of Maryland.
24.
Wilson, D. B., Mitchell, O., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2002). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Paper presented at the American Society of Criminology, Chicago.
