The United States has experienced significant changes in its juvenile justice system since it began in 1899. The focus of juvenile sentencing has shifted from the best interests of the child to more punitive sanctions, which are based on the offense committed. An alternative method for dealing with offenders has arisen in the form of restorative justice, which focuses on balancing the justice response between offender, victim, and community. This article describes the changes in the U.S. juvenile system, highlights the sentencing practices in other countries, and addresses this conflict between punitive and restorative practices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
(Reprinted in Readings In Juvenile Justice Administration, by B. C. Feld, Ed., 1999).
2.
Arrigo, B. A., & Robert C. Schehr. (1998). Restoring justice for juveniles: A critical analysis of victim-offender mediation. Justice Quarterly, 15(4), 629-666.
3.
Ashworth, A. J. (1992). Sentencing reform structures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Bazemore, G. (1998a). Evaluating community youth sanctioning models: Neighborhood dimensions and beyond. Crime and place: Plenary papers of the 1997 conference on criminal justice research and evaluation (pp.23-49). National Institute of Justice.
5.
Bazemore, G. (1998b). Restorative justice and earned redemption: Communities, victims, and offender reintegration. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(6), 768-813.
6.
Bazemore, G., & Umbreit, M. (1995). Rethinking the sanctioning function in juvenile court: Retributive or restorative responses to youth crime. Crime & Delinquency, 41(3), 296-316.
7.
Bazemore, G., & Umbreit, M. (1999). Conferences, circles, boards, and mediations: Restorative justice and citizen involvement in the response to youth crime. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
8.
Bazemore, G., & Walgrave, L. (1999). Restorative juvenile justice: In search of fundamentals and an outline for systematic reform. In G. Bazemore & L. Walgrave (Eds.), Restorative juvenile justice: Repairing the harm of youth crime (pp. 45-73). New York: Criminal Justice Press.
9.
Bernard, T. J. (1992). The cycle of juvenile justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Bishop, D. M. (2000). Juvenile offenders in the adult criminal justice system. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Boston Police Department and Partners. (1997). The Boston strategy to prevent youth violence. Boston: Author.
12.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Bureau of Justice Assistance. (1992). Accountability in dispositions for juvenile drug offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
14.
Cannon, A.,& Stanford, R. M.(1981). Evaluation of the Juvenile Alternative Services Project. Unpublished manuscript, Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services.
15.
Corbett, R. P., Jr., Fitzgerald, B. L., & Jordan, J. (1996). Operation Night Light: An emerging model for police-probation partnership. In L. Brown & K. Ciffolillo (Eds.), Better government competition. Invitation to change: Better government competition on public safety 1996 winners (Series No. 6). Boston: Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research.
16.
Crawford, A., & Newburn, T. (2002). Recent developments in restorative justice for young people in England and Wales: Community participation, and representation. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 476-495.
17.
Decker, S. H. (1985). A systematic analysis of diversion: Net widening and beyond. Journal of Criminal Justice, 13, 206-216.
18.
(Reprinted in Readings in juvenile justice administration, by B. C. Feld (Ed.), 1999.
19.
Feld, B. C. (1993). Criminalizing the American juvenile court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20.
Feld, B. C. (1998). Juvenile and criminal justice systems’responses to youth violence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Feld, B. C. (1999a). Bad kids: Race and the transformation of the juvenile court.New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
Feld, B. C. (Ed.). (1999b). Readings in juvenile justice administration. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Guedalia, L. J. (1979). Predicting recidivism of juvenile delinquents on restitutionary probation from selected background, subject, and program variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, American University, Washington, DC.
24.
Hofford, M. (1981). Juvenile restitution program. Unpublished final report. Trident. United Way. Charleston, SC.
25.
Junger-Tas, J. (1992). Juvenile delinquency in the Netherlands: Trends and perspectives. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 16(2), 207-227.
26.
Kempf, K., Decker, S. H., & Bing, R. L. (1990). An analysis of apparent disparities in the handling of Black youth within Missouri’s juvenile justice system. St. Louis: University of Missouri Press.
27.
Kennedy, D.M.,& Braga, A.A.(1998). Homicide in Minneapolis: Research for problem solving. Homicide Studies, 2(3), 263-290.
28.
Kennedy, D. M., Braga, A. A., Piehl, A. M., & Waring, E. J. (2001). Reducing violence: The Boston gun project’s operation ceasefire (Research Report). Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.
29.
Klein, M. W. (1979). Deinstitutionalization and diversion of juvenile offenders: A litany of impediments. In N. Morris & M. Tonry (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Kurki, L. (1999). Incorporating restorative and community justice into American sentencing and corrections. Sentencing & correction: Issues for the 21st century (Papers from the executive sessions on sentencing and corrections). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
31.
Lawrence, R. (1991). Reexamining community corrections models. Crime & Delinquency, 34(4), 449-464.
32.
Leverant, S., Cullen, F. T., Fulton, B., & Wozniak, J. F. (1999). Reconsidering restorative justice: The corruption of benevolence revisited? Crime & Delinquency, 45(1), 3-27.
33.
(Reprinted in Readings in juvenile justice administration, by B. C. Feld (Ed.), 1999. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
Maxwell, G., & Morris, A. (1993). Family, victims, and culture: Youth justice in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: University of Wellington.
35.
Moore, M. H., & Wakeling, S. (1997). Juvenile justice: Shoring up the foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Morris, A. (2002). Critiquing the critics: A brief response to critics of restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 596-615.
37.
Morris, A., & Maxwell, G. (1998). Restorative justice in New Zealand: Family group conferences as a case study. Western Criminology Review, 1(1). Available at http://wcr.sonoma.edu/v1n1/morris.html
38.
Nugent, W. R., Umbreit, M. S., Wiinamaki, L., & Paddock, J. (1999, summer). Participation in victim-offender mediation reduces recidivism. VOMA Connections, 3. New York: Victim Offender Mediation Association.
39.
Pisciotta, A. W. (1994). Benevolent repression: Social control and the American reformatory-prison movement. New York: New York University Press.
40.
Platt, A. M. (1977). The child savers: The invention of delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
Pratt, J. (1989). Corporatism: The third model of juvenile justice. British Journal of Criminology, 29(3), 236-254.
42.
Reichel, P. L. (2002). Comparative criminal justice systems: A topical approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
43.
Rothman, D. J. (1971). The discovery of the asylum: Social order and disorder in the new republic. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
44.
Reprinted in Readings in juvenile justice administration, by B. C. Feld (Ed.), 1999. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
Shichor, D., & Binder, A. (1982). Community restitution for juveniles: An approach and preliminary evaluation. Criminal Justice Review, 7(2), 46-50.
46.
Seymour, J. (1996). Australia. In D. J. Shoemaker (Ed.), International handbook on juvenile justice (pp. 1-19). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
47.
Singer, S. I. (1996). Recriminalizing delinquency: Violent juvenile crime and juvenile justice reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48.
Reprinted in Readings in juvenile justice administration, by B. C. Feld (Ed.), 1999. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
Umbreit, M. S. (1996). Information on research findings related uniquely to restorative justice interventions: Victim offender mediation and family group conferencing.Unpublished manuscript, Center for Restorative Justice and Mediation.
50.
Umbreit, M. S. (1998). Restorative justice through victim-offender mediation: A multi-site assessment. Western Criminology Review, 1(1). Available at http://wcr.sonoma.edu/v1n1/umbreit.html
51.
Umbreit, M. S., & Coates, R. B. (1993). Cross-site analysis of victim-offender mediation in four states. Crime & Delinquency, 39(4), 565-585.
52.
Umbreit, M. S., & Greenwood, P. (1997). National survey of victim-offender mediation programs in the U.S. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
53.
Wakefield, W., & Hirschel, J. D. (1996). England. In D. J. Shoemaker (Ed.), International handbook on juvenile justice (pp. 90-109). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
54.
Wax, M. L. (1977). Effects of symbolic restitution and presence of victim on delinquent shoplifters. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington State University.
