This article traces the development of sodomy laws and the history of their piecemeal invalidation in the United States. It then presents several arguments for the decriminalization of sodomy laws still in existence, focusing on constitutional law and the inapplicability of the major philosophical justifications for criminal punishment. The article also presents moral and social arguments for decriminalization that are often left out of the debate about the continuing viability of sodomy laws, including their role in perpetuating stigma and discrimination against homosexuals, creating a class of “criminals,” and contributing to the psychological, emotional, and physical abuse of gays, lesbians, and bisexuals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amar, A. R.
(1996). Attainder and amendment 2: Romer's rightness. Michigan Law Review, 95, 203-235.
2.
American Civil Liberties Union. (2001a). “Abominable and detestable crimes against nature”: An ACLU lesbian and gay rights project update on the status of sodomy laws. Retrieved February 27, 2002 from www.aclu.org/issues/gay/sodomy_update.html
3.
American Civil Liberties Union. (2001b). Sodomy laws: Clear and present danger: Examples of sodomy laws used to discriminate against lesbians and gay men. Retrieved February 27, 2002 from www.aclu.org/issues/gay/sodomy_examples.html
4.
American Psychological Association & American Public Health Association. (1986, January 31). Brief of amici curie in support of respondents. In Bowers v. Hardwick, No. 85-140 (Lexis-Nexis U.S. Supreme Court Briefs).
5.
Andenaes, J.
(1952). General prevention—Illusion or reality?Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 43, 176-180.
6.
Barnhart, D. M.
(1981). Commonwealth v. Bonadio: Voluntary deviate sexual intercourse— A comparative analysis. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 43, 253-284.
7.
Bentham, J.
(1962). Principles of penal law, Pt. II, book 1, chap. 3. In J. Bowring (Ed.), Jeremy Bentham's works (pp. 396-402). New York: Russell and Russell. (Original work published 1843)
8.
Bohan, J. S.
(1996). Psychology and sexual orientation: Coming to terms. New York: Routledge.
9.
Boswell, J.
(1980). Christianity, social tolerance & homosexuality. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
10.
Boswell, J.
(1993). On the history of social attitudes toward homosexuality from ancient Greece to the present. In M. Wolinsky & J. Sherrill (Eds.), Gays and the military: The United States v. Joseph Steffan (pp. 40-49). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
Blumstein, P.
, & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples: Money, work, and sex.New York: William Morrow.
12.
Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986).
13.
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, 530 U.S. 640 (2000).
14.
Brantner, P. A.
(1992). Removing bricks from a wall of discrimination: State constitutional challenges to sodomy laws. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 19, 495-533.
15.
Brooks, A. E.
(1985). Doe and Dronenburg: Sodomy statutes are constitutional. William and Mary Law Review, 26, 645-682.
16.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
17.
Catania, D. A.
(1994). The universal declaration of human rights and sodomy laws: A federal common law right to privacy for homosexuals based on customary international law. American Criminal Law Review, 31, 289-325.
18.
Chang, D.
(1994). Beyond uncompromising positions: Hate crimes legislation and the common ground between conservative republicans and gay rights advocates. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 21, 1097-1105.
19.
Cohen, J.
(1983, December). Incapacitating criminals: Recent research findings. In National Institute of Justice Research in Brief (pp. 1-6). Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
20.
Coleman, P.
(1991). Who's been sleeping in my bed? You and me, and the state makes three. Indiana Law Review, 24, 399-416.
21.
Comstock, G. D.
(1991). Violence against lesbians and gay men. New York: Columbia University Press.
22.
Conner, R. P.
(1993). Blossom of bone: Reclaiming the connections between homoeroticism and the sacred. New York: HarperCollins.
23.
Cory, D. W.
(1975). The homosexual in America: A subjective approach. New York: Arno.
24.
Davis, J. R.
(1978). The terrorists: Youth, biker and prison violence. San Diego, CA: Dan Cor Press.
25.
DeCecco, J. P.
, & Parker, D. A. (1995). The biology of homosexuality: Sexual orientation or sexual preference?Journal of Homosexuality, 28, 1-27.
26.
Devlin, P.
(1965). The enforcement of morals. London: Oxford University Press.
27.
D.H. v. H. H., Ms. 2991129, 2001 Ala. Civ. App. Lexis 237 (June 1, 2001).
28.
Dodson, R. D.
(1999). Homosexual discrimination and gender: Was Romer v. Evans really a victory for gay rights?California Western Law Review, 35, 271-312.
29.
Donohoe, C.
(1990, June 29). Adultery: It's not just a sin, it's a crime. The Washington Times, p. E1-E1.
30.
Dover, J. K.
(1978). Greek homosexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Dworkin, R.
(1966). Lord Devlin and the enforcement of morals. Yale Law Journal, 75, 986-1003.
32.
Dworkin, R.
(1977). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972).
34.
Ellis, H.
(1964). The psychology of sex: A manual for students. New York: Emerson.
35.
Equality Foundation of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. v. City of Cincinnati, 128 F.3d 289 (6th 1997).
36.
Eskridge, W. N.
(1997). Law and the construction of the closet: American regulation of same-sex intimacy 1880-1946. Iowa Law Review, 82, 1007-1136.
37.
Ex parte H.H., No. 1002045, 2002 Ala. Lexis 44 (2002).
38.
Font, B.R.S.
(2000). Homophobia: A history. New York: Picador.
39.
Foucault, M.
(1979). The history of sexuality: An introduction (Vol. 1). London: Allen Lane.
40.
Freud, S.
(1973). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. London: Pelican Freud Library. (Original work published 1905)
41.
Goldstein, A. B.
(1988). History, homosexuality, and political values: Searching for the hidden determinants of Bowers v. Hardwick. Yale Law Journal, 97, 1073-1103.
42.
Goodman, R.
(2001). Beyond the enforcement principle: Sodomy laws, social norms, and social panoptics. California Law Review, 89, 643-740.
43.
Green, R.
(1989). Griswold's legacy: Fornication and adultery as crimes. Ohio Northern University Law Review, 16, 545-549.
44.
Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, 485 (1965).
45.
Halley, J. E.
(1997). Gay rights and the courts: The amendment 2 controversy: Romer vs. Hardwick. University of Colorado Law Review, 68, 429-451.
46.
Hamill, K. M.
(1997). Romer v. Evans: Dulling the equal protection gloss on Bowers v. Hardwick. Boston University Law Review, 77, 655-685.
47.
Hardwick v. Bowers, 760 F.2d 1202, 1211-12 (11th Cir. 1985).
48.
Harrison, J. V.
(2000). Peeping through the closet keyhole: Sodomy, homosexuality, and the amorphous right of privacy. St. John's Law Review, 74, 1087-1138.
49.
Hart, H.L.A.
(1963). Law, liberty, and morality. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
50.
Hart, H.L.A.
(1968). Punishment and responsibility: Essays in the philosophy of law. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
51.
Harvard Law Review
. (1986). Note, Right to privacy and consensual sodomy: Bowers v. Hardwick. Harvard Law Review, 100, 210-215.
52.
Herek, G. M.
(1990). Homophobia. In W. Dynes (Ed.), Encyclopedia of homosexuality (p. 552-552) New York: Garland.
53.
Heston, L. L.
, & Shields, J. (1968). Homosexuality in twins: A family study and a registry study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 18, 149-160.
54.
Jacobs, A. M.
(1996). Romer wasn't built in a day: The subtle transformation in judicial argument over gay rights. Wisconsin Law Review, 1996, 893-969.
55.
Jacobson, R. L.
(1999).“Megan's Laws”: Reinforcing old patterns of anti-gay police harassment. Georgetown Law Journal, 87, 2431-2466.
56.
Kallmann, F. J.
(1952). Comparative twin study on the genetic aspects of male homosexuality. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 115, 283-293.
57.
Kant, I.
(1974). The philosophy of law: An exposition of the fundamental principles of jurisprudence as the science of right (W. Hastie, Trans.). Clifton, NJ: A. M. Kelley. (Original work published 1887)
58.
Keys, D. P.
(2002). Instrumental sexual scripting: An examination of gender-role fluidity in the correctional institution. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 18(3), 258-278.
59.
Kiester, E.
(1972). Crimes with no victims: How legislating morality defeats the cause of justice. New York: Alliance for a Safer New York.
60.
Kogan, T. S.
(1994). Legislative violence against lesbians and gay men. Utah Law Review, 1994, 209-245.
61.
Laumann, E.
, Gagnon, J., Michael, R., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62.
Lee, S. F.
(1986). Law and morals: Warnock, Gillick, and beyond. New York: Oxford University Press.
63.
Leff, L.
(1990, April 28). Maryland court hears appeal of oral sex conviction. The Washington Post, p. B1-B1.
64.
Leslie, C. R.
(2000). Creating criminals: The injuries inflicted by “unenforced” sodomy laws. Harvard Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Law Review, 35, 103-181.
65.
LeVay, S.
, & Hamer, D. H. (1994, May). Evidence for a biological influence in male homosexuality. Scientific American, pp. 44-49.
66.
Leveno, E. A.
(1994). New hope for the new federalism: State constitutional challenges to sodomy statutes. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 62, 1029-1054.
67.
Louisiana v. Baxley, 656 So. 2d 973 (La. 1995).
68.
Martinson, R.
(1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest, 35, 22-54.
69.
Michaelson, S. E.
(1984). Religion and morality legislation: A reexamination of establishment clause analysis. New York University Law Review, 59, 301-409.
70.
Mohr, R.
(1988). Gays justice: A study of ethics, society, and law. New York: Columbia University Press.
71.
Morris, H.
(1976). On guilt and innocence: Essays in legal philosophy and moral psychology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
72.
Murphy, J. G.
(1995). Legal moralism and liberalism. Arizona Law Review, 37, 73-93.
73.
Papadopoulos, M. E.
(1997). Inkblot jurisprudence: Romer v. Evans as a great defeat for the gay rights movement. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 7, 165-202.
74.
Pillard, R. C.
, & Bailey, J. M. (1998). Human sexual orientation has a heritable component. Human Biology, 70, 347-365.
75.
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896).
76.
Powell v. State, 510 S.E.2d 18 (Ga. 1998).
77.
Rabinowitz, C. B.
(1995). Proposals for progress: Sodomy laws and the European Convention on Human Rights. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 25, 425-469.
78.
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1972).
79.
Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996).
80.
Rychlak, R. J.
(1990). Society's moral right to punish: A further exploration of the denunciation theory of punishment. Tulane Law Review, 65, 299-338.
81.
Saum, C. A.
, Surratt, H. L., Inciardi, J. A., & Bennett, R. E. (1995). Sex in prison: Exploring the myths and realities. Prison Journal, 75, 413-430.
82.
Schmid, H. J.
(2000). Decriminalization of sodomy under South Africa's 1996 constitution: Implications for South African and U.S. law. Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law, 8, 163-204.
83.
Schwartz, L. B.
(1963). Morals, offenses, and the Model Penal Code. Columbia Law Review, 63, 669-712.
84.
Seavey, D.
(1990, May 7). Archaic sex laws should be repealed. USA Today, p. A10-A10.
85.
State v. Limon, Cr. No. 00-85898-A (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
86.
Strong, S. I.
(1997). Romer v. Evans and the permissibility of morality legislation. Arizona Law Review, 39, 1259-1314.
87.
Terl, A. H.
(2000). An essay on the history of lesbian and gay rights in Florida. Nova Law Review, 24, 793-853.
88.
Tygart, C. E.
(2000). Genetic causation attribution and public support of gay rights. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12, 259-275.
89.
Von Hirsch, A.
(1976). Doing justice: The choice of punishments: Report of the Committee for the Study of Incarceration. New York: Hill & Wang.
90.
Walsh, K. G.
(1997). Throwing stones: Rational basis review triumphs over homophobia. Seton Hall Law Review, 27, 1064-1093.
91.
Williams, W. L.
(1986). The spirit and the flesh: Sexual diversity in American Indian culture. Boston: Beacon Press.
92.
Williamson, B. J.
(1989). The constitutional privacy doctrine after Bowers v. Hardwick: Rethinking the second death of substantive due process. Southern California Law Review, 62, 1297-1330.
