This study reports the results of a telephone survey of 387 residents in a southern rural county concerning juvenile crime and justice issues. The study concluded that there are several communities among county residents, not just two based on race. County residents surveyed are willing to support the rehabilitation of juveniles, but there is strong support for punishment. Gangs are considered a very serious problem by a major portion of the county residents. County residents are divided on the purpose of criminal penalties for juveniles and whether to waive juveniles to adult courts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Applegate, B.
, Cullen, G., & Fisher, B. (1997). Public support for correctional treatment: The continuing appeal of the rehabilitative ideal. The Prison Journal, 77, 237-258.
2.
Benedict, W. R.
, Bower, D. J., Brown, B., & Cunningham, R. (1999). Small town surveys: Bridging the gap between police and the community. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 15(2), 144-154.
3.
Champion, D.
(1989). Teenage felons and the waiver hearing: Some recent trends, 1980-1988. Crime & Delinquency, 35, 577-585.
4.
Cullen, F.
, Golden, K., & Cullen, J. (1983). Is child saving dead? Attitudes toward juvenile rehabilitation in Illinois. Journal of Criminal Justice, 11, 1-13.
5.
Flanagan, T. J.
, & Longmire, D. R. (1996). Americans view crime and justice: A national public opinion survey. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Gerber, J.
, & Engelhardt-Greer, S. (1996). Just and painful: Attitudes toward sentencing criminals. In T. Flanagan & D. R. Longmire (Eds.), Americans view crime and justice: A national public opinion survey (chap. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Krisberg, B.
, & Austin, J. F. (1993). Reinventing juvenile justice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Lawrence, R.
(2000). School violence, the media, and the ACJS. ACJS Today, 20(2), 1, 4-6.
9.
Moon, M.
, Sundt, J., Cullen F., & Wright, J. (2000). Is child saving dead? Public support for juvenile rehabilitation. Crime & Delinquency, 46(1), 38-60.
10.
Schwartz, I.
(1992). Juvenile crime-fighting policies: What the public really wants. In I. Schwartz (Ed.), Juvenile justice and public policy (pp. 214-248). New York: Lexington Books.
11.
Schwartz, I.
, Abbey, J., & Barton, W. (1990). The perception and reality of juvenile crime in Michigan. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for the Study of Youth Policy.
12.
Surette, R.
(1998). Media, crime, and criminal justice. Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth.
13.
Triplett, R.
(1996). The growing threat: Gangs and juvenile offender. In T. Flanagan & D. R. Longmire (Eds.), Americans view crime and justice: A national public opinion survey (chap. 10). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice
and Delinquency Prevention. (1999a). Juvenile court statistics 1996. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
15.
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice
and Delinquency Prevention. (1999b). 1996 national youth gang survey. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
16.
Worrall, J. L.
(1999). Public perceptions of police efficacy and image: The “fuzziness” of support for the police. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 4(1), 47-66.
