Essentials for Integrity and High-Quality Peer Review in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cheng

Sun

Liu

(2024). Generative artificial intelligence is infiltrating peer review process. Critical Care (London, England), 28(1), 149. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-04933-z

Donker

(2023). The dangers of using large language models for peer review. The Lancet. Infectious Diseases, 23(7), 781. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00290-6

M. R.

(2025). Stewardship of peer reviewers to advance science and knowledge. Journal of Transcultural Nursing: Official Journal of the Transcultural Nursing Society, 36(4), 349–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/10436596251345667

Lim

G. H.

Tan

M. L.

Hoe

V. C. W.

Koh

(2025). Generative AI in peer review process for occupational health. Occupational Medicine (Oxford, England), 75(5), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqaf051

Lin

(2025). Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 9(4), 426–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-024-01185-8

Singh Chawla

. (2024). Is ChatGPT corrupting peer review? Telltale words hint at AI use. Nature, 628(8008), 483–484. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01051-2