To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Compassion Motivation and Action Scales (CMAS).
Method:
The study had a methodological design and involved 433 participants aged 18 to 64. The translation validity of the CMAS was evaluated by 10 experts, and content validity indices were computed. The factor structure of the CMAS was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Pearson product-moment correlation was used to test convergent validity, and Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s ω coefficients were used to test internal consistency and reliability.
Results:
Both the compassion and self-compassion scales of the CMAS showed excellent translational validity. CFA confirmed the three-factor structure of the compassion and self-compassion scales of the CMAS.
Conclusions:
The CMAS has demonstrated good validity and reliability in adult individuals in Turkish society. The CMAS can be used to assess and follow up on compassionate action and motivation in adult individuals.
AriE.Cesur-SoysalG.BasranJ.GilbertP. (2022). The Compassionate Engagement and Action Scales for self and others: Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 780077. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2022.780077/BIBTEX
2.
BandalosD. L. (2021). Item meaning and order as causes of correlated residuals in confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(6), 903–913. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2021.1916395
3.
BarbaranelliC.LeeC. S.VelloneE.RiegelB. (2015). The problem with Cronbach’s alpha: Comment on Sijtsma and van der Ark (2015). Nursing Research, 64(2), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000079
4.
BentlerP. M.BonettD. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
5.
BlombergK.GriffithsP.WengströmY.MayC.BridgesJ. (2016). Interventions for compassionate nursing care: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 62, 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJNURSTU.2016.07.009
6.
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.
7.
CicchettiD. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
GilbertP. (2014). The origins and nature of compassion focused therapy. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53(1), 6–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJC.12043
GilbertP. (2021). Creating a compassionate world: Addressing the conflicts between sharing and caring versus controlling and holding evolved strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 582090. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2020.582090/BIBTEX
13.
GilbertP.CatarinoF.DuarteC.MatosM.KoltsR.StubbsJ.CeresattoL.DuarteJ.Pinto-GouveiaJ.BasranJ. (2017). The development of compassionate engagement and action scales for self and others. Journal of Compassionate Health Care, 4(1), 41–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40639-017-0033-3
14.
GilbertP.McEwanK.MatosM.RivisA. (2011). Fears of compassion: Development of three self-report measures. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 84(3), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1348/147608310X526511
15.
HajjarS. T. (2018). Statistical analysis: Internal-consistency reliability and construct validity. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 6(1), 46–57.
16.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
17.
International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed.).
18.
JinpaT. (2015). A fearless heart: Why compassion is the key to greater wellbeing. Little Brown.
19.
JöreskogK. G.SörbomD. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.
20.
KaşıkçıM.YıldırımZ.WatsonR. (2025). Ethical sensitivity and compassion competence in nursing students: Two-center study/comparison of two different cultures. Nurse Education Today, 144, 106450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106450
21.
KirbyJ. N.TellegenC. L.SteindlS. R. (2017). A meta-analysis of compassion-based interventions: Current state of knowledge and future directions. Behavior Therapy, 48(6), 778–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BETH.2017.06.003
22.
KlineR. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications.
23.
KoteraY.Martínez-RivesN. L.AledehM.ColmanR.VeaseyC.HarringtonT.KomoriN.OzakiA.GrinerD.AliY.TaylorE. C. (2024). Cross-cultural psychology and compassion. Encyclopedia, 4(4), 1509–1519. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4040098
MathesonG. J. (2019). We need to talk about reliability: Making better use of test-retest studies for study design and interpretation. PeerJ, 2019(5), Article e6918. https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ.6918/SUPP-1
26.
MatosM.GonçalvesE.PalmeiraL.MeloI.SteindlS. R.GomesA. A. (2023). Advancing the assessment of compassion: Psychometric study of the compassion motivation and action scales in a Portuguese sample. Current Psychology, 42(12), 10092–10106. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12144-021-02311-4/TABLES/4
27.
McDonaldB.KanskeP. (2023). Gender differences in empathy, compassion, and prosocial donations, but not theory of mind in a naturalistic social task. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 20748. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47747-9
NunnallyJ. C. (1994). Psychometric theory 3E. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
30.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T.OwenS. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/NUR.20199
31.
PommierE.NeffK. D.Tóth-KirályI. (2020). The development and validation of the Compassion Scale. Assessment, 27(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119874
32.
RaykovT.MarcoulidesG. A. (2008). An introduction to applied multivariate analysis (1st ed.). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809532
33.
RegmiP. R.WaithakaE.PaudyalA.SimkhadaP.Van TeijlingenE. (2016). Guide to the design and application of online questionnaire surveys. Nepal Journal of Epidemiology, 6(4), 640–644. https://doi.org/10.3126/nje.v6i4.17258
34.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/JSS.V048.I02
35.
SalazarL. R.GuerreroL.RobertoA.MillsapR. (2013). Communicating with compassion: The exploratory factor analysis and primary validation process of the Compassionate Communication Scale. Arizona State University.
36.
SteindlS. R.KirbyJ. N.TelleganC. (2018). Motivational interviewing in compassion-based interventions: Theory and practical applications. Clinical Psychologist, 22(3), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/cp.12146
37.
SteindlS. R.TellegenC. L.FilusA.SeppäläE.DotyJ. R.KirbyJ. N. (2021). The Compassion Motivation and Action Scales: A self-report measure of compassionate and self-compassionate behaviours. Australian Psychologist, 56(2), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2021.1893110
38.
SteindlS. R.YiuR. X. Q.BaumannT.MatosM. (2020). Comparing compassion across cultures: Similarities and differences among Australians and Singaporeans. Australian Psychologist, 55(3), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12433
39.
StraussC.Lever TaylorB.GuJ.KuykenW.BaerR.JonesF.CavanaghK. (2016). What is compassion and how can we measure it? A review of definitions and measures. Clinical Psychology Review, 47, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPR.2016.05.004
40.
TakmakŞ.KaraçarY. (2025). Does fear of compassion effect nurses’ caring behaviours? A cross-sectional study. Nursing Ethics, 32(1), 336–351.
41.
TerweeC. B.BotS. D. M.de BoerM. R.van der WindtD. A. W. M.KnolD. L.DekkerJ.BouterL. M.de VetH. C. W. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2006.03.012
WildD.GroveA.MartinM.EremencoS.McElroyS.Verjee-LorenzA.EriksonP. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value in Health, 8(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1524-4733.2005.04054.X
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
