Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale–Turkish version (TPDS-T). Methods: The sample consisted of 214 healthy pregnant women in maternity clinics in an urban center in western Turkey. The instruments included a demographic questionnaire and TPDS-T. Results: The internal consistency reliability coefficient of the TPDS-T was .70. The correlation coefficients between the lower dimension item scores and lower dimension total scores were .20 to .73. According to the confirmatory factor analysis, the model fit indexes of the scale were determined as root mean square error of approximation = .051, goodness-of-fit index = .91, comparative fit index = .92, and nonnormed fit index = .90. Conclusion: The TPDS-T is a valid and reliable scale that can be used to determine distress of pregnant women in Turkey. Implications for Practice: This scale can be used as a guide by Turkish midwives and obstetric nurses planning pregnancy follow-up care.
AksayanS.GözümS. (2002). Kültürlerarası ölçek uyarlaması için rehber I: Ölçek uyarlama aşamaları ve dil uyarlaması [A guide for transcultural scale adaptation I: Stages of tool adaptation and language adaptation]. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi, 4, 9-14. Retrieved from http://hemarge.org.tr/ckfinder/userfiles/files/2002/2002-vol4-sayi1-147.pdf
2.
AksayanS.GözümS. (2003). Kültürler arası ölçek uyarlaması için rehber II: Psikometrik özellikler ve kültürlerarası karşılaştırma [Guidelines for cross-cultural scale adaptation II: Psychometric properties and cross-cultural comparison]. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Dergisi, 5, 3-14. Retrieved from http://hemarge.org.tr/ckfinder/userfiles/files/2003/2003-vol5-sayi1-65.pdf
3.
AkbaşE.VırıtO.KalenderoğluA.SavaşA. H.SertbaşG. (2008). Gebelikte sosyodemografik değişkenlerin kaygı ve depresyon düzeyleriyle ilişkisi [Relation of socio demographic variables in pregnancy with anxiety and depression levels ]. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, 45, 85-91. Retrieved from http://www.noropsikiyatriarsivi.com/sayilar/386/buyuk/9-13.pdf
4.
AlderJ.FınkN.BitzerJ.HösliI.HolzgreveW. (2007). Depression and anxiety during pregnancy: A risk factor for obstetric, fetal and neonatal outcome? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 20, 189-209. doi:10.1080/14767050701209560
5.
AlderdiceF.LynnF. (2011). Factor structure of the Prenatal Distress Questionnaire. Midwifery, 27, 553-539. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.003
6.
BüyüköztürkŞ. (2007). Veri analizi el kitabı [Data analysis manual] (8th ed., pp. 167-182). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Ak.
7.
ÇalıkY. K.AktaşS. (2011). Gebelikte depresyon: Sıklık, risk faktörleri ve tedavisi. [Depression in pregnancy: Frequency, risk factors and treatment]. Psikiyatrik Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 3, 142-162. Retrieved from http://www.cappsy.org/archives/vol3/no1/cap_03_07.pdf
FurberC. M.GarrodD.MaloneyE.LovellK.McGowanL. (2009). A qualitative study of mild to moderate psychological distress during pregnancy. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 669-677. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.12.003
10.
GlazierR.ElgarF.GoelV.HolzapfelS. (2004). Stress, social support and emotional distress in a community sample of pregnant women. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 25, 247-255. doi:10.1080/01674820400024406
KellyR. M.RussoJ.KatonW. (2001). Somatic complaints among pregnant women cared for in obstetrics: Normal pregnancy or depressive and anxiety symptom amplification revisited?General Hospital Psychiatry, 23, 107-113. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834301001293#
13.
KılıçarslanS. (2008). Edirne şehir merkezindeki son trimester gebelerin sosyodemografik özellikleri, yaşam kaliteleri, kaygı düzeyleri [Sociodemographic features, life qualities and anxiety levels of pregnant women in the final trimester in the city center of Edirne] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Trakya University, Edine, Turkey.
14.
LancasterC. A.GoldK. J.FlynnH. A.YooH.MarcusS. M.DavisM. M. (2010). Risk factors for depressive symptoms during pregnancy: A systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 202, 5-14. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.09.007
LauY.YinL. (2011). Maternal, obstetric variables, perceived stress and health-related quality of life among pregnant women in Macao, China. Midwifery, 22, 668-673.
17.
LittletonY. L.EngeberstonJ. C. (2005). Maternity nursing care (1st ed.). New York, NY: CENGAGE Delmar Learning.
18.
LobelM.CannellaD. L.GrahamJ. E.DeVincentC.SchneiderJ.MeyerB. A. (2008). Pregnancy-specific stress, prenatal health behaviors, and birth outcomes. Health Psychology, 27(5): 604-615. doi: 10.1037/a0013242
19.
MelenderH. L. (2002). Experiences of fears associated with pregnancy and childbirth: A study of 329 pregnant women. Birth, 29, 101-111.
20.
OkanlıA.TortumluoğluG.Kırpınarİ. (2003). Gebe kadınların ailelerinden algıladıkları sosyal destek ile problem çözme becerileri arasındaki ilişki [The relation between the social support perceived by pregnant women from their families and their problem solving skills]. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 4, 98-105. Retrieved from http://lokman.cu.edu.tr/psikiyatri/derindex/apd/fulltext/2003/98.pdf
ÖzdamarK. (2002). Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi [Statistical data analysis with packaged software] (4th ed.). Eskişehir, Turkey: Kaan Kitabevi (Kaan Bookstore).
23.
PopV. J. M.PommerA. M.Pop-PurceleanuM.WijnenH. A. A.BerginkV.PouwerF.(2011). Development of the Tilburg Pregnancy Distress Scale: The TPDS. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth, 80, 1-8. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/11/80
24.
RaymondJ. E. (2009). Creating a safety net: Women’s experiences of antenatal depression and their identification of helpful community support and services during pregnancy. Midwifery, 25, 39-49. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2007.01.005
25.
RosandG. M.SlinningK.Eberhard-GranM.RoysambE.TambsK. (2011). Partner relationship satisfaction and maternal emotional distress in early pregnancy. BMC Public Health, 11, 1-12. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/161
26.
SunalN.DemiryayA. (2009). Gebe kadınların algıladıkları fiziksel ve emosyonel yakınmalar [Physical and emotional complaints perceived by pregnant women]. Fırat Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi, 4, 99-110. Retrieved from http://web.firat.edu.tr/shmyo/edergi/Ciltdortsayioniki/FSHD99-110.pdf
27.
ŞencanH. (2005). Sosyal ve Davranışsal Ölçümlerde Güvenilirlik ve Geçerlilik [Reliability and validity of the social and behavioral measurements] (1st ed.). Ankara, Turkey: Sistem.
28.
TaşkınL. (2011). Doğum ve kadın sağlığı hemşireliği kitabı [Gynecology and obstetrics nursing book] (10th ed.). Ankara, Turkey: Sistem.
29.
TavşancılE. (2006). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi [Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS] (3rd ed.). Ankara, Turkey: Nobel.
YaliM.LobelM. (2002). Stress-resistance resources and coping in pregnancy. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 15, 289-309. doi:10.1080/1061580021000020743
32.
YılmazV.ÇelikH. E.EkizH. E. (2006). Kuruma bağlılığı etkileyen faktörlerin yapısal eşitlik modelleriyle araştırılması: özel ve devlet bankası örneği [Investigation of factors affecting the commitment to the institution with structural equation models: Sample of private and state bank]. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2, 171-177.
