In this article the discrimination model of probabilistic choice proposed by Lindenberg is tested in a telephone survey. This model is based on the assumption of bounded rationality in the sense of restricted information processing capacity. Unlike subjective expected utility (SEU) theory, which is also tested, the discrimination model assumes that the cognitive limitations are so severe that actors will only be able to focus on one main situational goal, or `frame', at a time. Problems of this model are discussed, and measurement instruments and the results of a telephone survey with road users are presented. In an experimentum crucis the discrimination model is tested against the SEU model.
Ajzen, Icek
. 1991. `The Theory of Planned Behavior.'Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50: 179-211.
2.
Bernholz, Peter
. 1992. `An Extended Theory of Institutions and Contractual Discipline. Comment.'Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics148: 155-162.
3.
Borgatta, Edgar F.
and George W. Bohrnstedt. 1980. `Level of measurement: Once over again.'Sociological Methods and Research9: 147-160.
4.
Braspenning, Jozé. 1992. `Framing: de Prospecttheorie en het Discriminatiemodel. Een Empirische Vergelijking en Validering.' Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
5.
Brüderl, Josef
and Peter Preisendörfer. 1995. `Der Weg zum Arbeitsplatz: Eine empirische Untersuchung zur Verkehrsmittelwahl.' In Kooperatives Umwelthandeln. Modelle—Erfahrungen—Maßnahmen, ed. Andreas Diekmann and Axel Franzen, pp. 69-88. Chur: Rüegger.
6.
Collins, Randall
. 1993. `The Rationality of Avoiding Choice.'Rationality and Society5: 58-67.
7.
Diekmann, Andreas
and Peter Preisendörfer. 1992. `Persönliches Umweltverhalten: Diskrepanzen zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit.'Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie44: 226-251.
8.
Domencich, T.
and D. McFadden. 1975. Urban Travel Demand. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
9.
Elster, Jon
. 1979. `Anomalies of Rationality: Some Unresolved Problems in the Theory of Rational Behavior.' In Sociological Economics, ed. Louis Lévy-Garboua, pp. 65-94. London: Sage.
10.
Esser, Hartmut
. 1993a. `The Rationality of Everyday Behavior: A Rational Choice Reconstruction of the Theory of Action by Alfred Schütz.'Rationality and Society5: 7-31.
11.
Esser, Hartmut
. 1993b. `How “Rational” is the Choice of Rational Choice?'Rationality and Society5: 408-414.
12.
Esser, Hartmut
. 1993c. `Social Modernization and the Increase in the Divorce Rate.'Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics149/1: 252-277.
13.
Frey, James H.
1985. Survey Research by Telephone. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. 3rd Edn.
14.
Frey, Bruno S.
and Reiner Eichenberger. 1989. `Should Social Scientists Care About Choice Anomalies?'Rationality and Society1: 101-122.
15.
Friedrichs, Jürgen
and Karl-Dieter Opp. 1994. `Rational Behavior in Everyday Situations.' Paper presented at the XIIIth World Congress of Sociology. Bielefeld.
16.
Geller, E. Scott
, Richard A. Winett and Peter B. Everett. 1982. Preserving the Environment. New Strategies for Behavior Change. New York: Pergamon Press.
17.
Kahneman, Daniel
and Amos Tversky. 1984. `Choices, Values, and Frames.'American Psychologist39: 341-350.
18.
Kelle, Udo
and Christian Lüdemann. 1995. “`Grau, teurer Freund, ist alle Theorie...” Rational Choice und das Problem der Brückenannahmen.'Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie47: 249-267.
19.
Kopp, Johannes
. 1994. Scheidung in der Bundesrepublik. Zur Erklärung des langfristigen Anstiegs der Scheidungsraten. Wiesbaden: DUV.
20.
Ligthart, Paul E.M.
and Siegwart Lindenberg. 1994. `Solidarity and Gain Maximization in Economic Transactions: Framing Effects on Selling Prices.' In Ethics and Economic Affairs, eds A. Lewis and K.-E. Wärneryd, pp. 215-230. London: Routledge.
21.
Lindenberg, Siegwart
. 1989a. `Choice and Culture: The Behavioral Basis of Cultural Impact on Transactions.' In Social Structure and Culture, ed. Hans Haferkamp, pp. 175-200. Berlin: De Gruyter.
22.
Lindenberg, Siegwart
. 1989b. `Social Production Functions, Deficits, and Social Revolutions. Prerevolutionary France and Russia.'Rationality and Society1: 51-77.
23.
Lindenberg, Siegwart
. 1992. `The Method of Decreasing Abstraction.' In Rational Choice Theory. Advocacy and Critique, eds James S. Coleman and Thomas J. Fararo, pp. 3-20. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
Lindenberg, Siegwart
. 1993. `Framing, Empirical Evidence, and Applications.' In Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie, Vol. 12, Neue Politische Ökonomie von Normen und Institutionen, eds P. Herder-Dornreich, K.-E. Schenk and D. Schmidtchen, pp. 11-38. Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck.
25.
Lüdemann, Christian
and Heinz Rothgang. 1996. `Der “eindimensionale” Akteur. Eine Kritik der Framing-Modelle von Siegwart Lindenberg und Hartmut Esser.'Zeitschrift für Soziologie25: 278-288.
26.
Mittal, Banwari
. 1988. `Achieving Higher Seat Belt Use: The Role of Habit in Bridging the Attitude-Behavior Gap.'Journal of Applied Social Psychology18: 993-1016.
27.
Opp, Karl-Dieter
. 1993. `Social Modernization and the Increase in the Divorce Rate. Comment.'Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics149/1: 278-282.
28.
Opp, Karl-Dieter
, Peter Hartmann and Petra Hartmann. 1989. The Rationality of Political Protest. A Comparative Analysis of Rational Choice Theory. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
29.
Opp, Karl-Dieter
, Peter Voss and Christiane Gern. 1995. Origins of Spontaneous Revolution. East Germany 1989. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
30.
Popper, Karl R.
1977. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
31.
Prendergast, Christopher
. 1993. `Rationality, Optimality, and Choice. Esser's Reconstruction of Alfred Schütz's Theory of Action.'Rationality and Society5: 47-57.
32.
Prisching, Manfred
. 1993. `Kommentar.' In Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie, Vol. 12, Neue Politische Ökonomie von Normen und Institutionen, eds P. Herder-Dornreich, K.-E. Schenk and D. Schmidtchen, pp. 43-49. Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck.
33.
Ronis, David I.
, J. Frank Yates and John P. Kirscht. 1989. `Attitudes, Decisions, and Habits as Determinants of Repeated Behavior.' In Attitude Structure and Function, eds Antony R. Pratkanis, Steven J. Breckler and Antony G. Greenwald, pp. 213-239. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34.
Schoemaker, Paul J.H.1982. `The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations.'Journal of Economic Literature20: 529-563.
35.
Sekuliç, Dusko
. 1992. `An Extended Theory of Institutions and Contractual Discipline. Comment.'Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics148: 163-167.
36.
Simon, Herbert A.
1988. `Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought.' In Decision Making. Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions, eds David E. Bell, Howard Raiffa and Amos Tversky, pp. 58-77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Srubar, Ilja
. 1993. `On the Limits of Rational Choice.'Rationality and Society5: 32-46.
38.
Tietzel, Manfred
. 1993. `Kommentar.' In Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie, Vol. 12, Neue Politische Ökonomie von Normen und Institutionen, eds P. Herder-Dornreich, K.-E. Schenk and D. Schmidtchen, pp. 39-42. Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck.
39.
Verplanken, Bas
, Henk Aarts, Ad van Knippenberg and Carina van Knippenberg. 1994. `Attitudes versus General Habit: Antecedents of Travel Mode Choice.'Journal of Applied Social Psychology24: 285-300.
40.
Witt, Ulrich
. 1993. `Social Modernization and the Increase in the Divorce Rate. Comment.'Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics149/1: 283-285.
41.
Wittenbraker, John
, Brenda Lynn Gibbs and Lynn R. Kahle. 1983. `Seat Belt Attitudes, Habits, and Behaviors: An Adaptive Amendment to the Fishbein Model.'Journal of Applied Social Psychology13: 406-421.
