Abstract
This study presents a socio-economic game of inflation and distributive conflict where inflation is derived from, and stabilization is implemented via, social norms. We apply the `Theory of Social Situations' (Greenberg 1990) to contrast rational choice outcomes predicted by Nash equilibrium vs those derived as social norms under our normative criteria (von Neumann-Morgenstern stability). We then analyze `heterodox' stabilization policies, which seek to address both the economic and sociological criteria for stabilization. Our conclusion is that social pacts constitute a viable normative approach to stabilization because they address the social conflict underlying chronic inflation in order to derive stabilizing norms.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
