Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper adopts a distinction between two uses of the notion of rationality, the `rationality of frame' and the `rationality of inference'. Rationality of frame is the rationality of the choices made between conceptual frames, for instance, between paradigms in science. Rationality of inference is the rationality of choices made between inferences, i.e. between rules which, in a given conceptual frame, allow actors to reach a decision or to solve a problem; many examples can be found in microeconomics (the rule of optimization) and in cognitive psychology (models of cognition). This distinction is suitable for the study of the controversies and misunderstandings that arise concerning the notion of rationality and it throws some light on controversies about rationality as optimization in microeconomics (the neo-classical versus evolutionary paradigm), choice anomalies (neo-classical economics versus cognitive psychology), and scientific creativity (cognitive psychology versus philosophy of science).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boudon, Raymond . 1993. The Art of Self-persuasion. Oxford: Blackwell.

Boudon, Raymond . 1995. Le juste et le vrai. Etudes sur l'objectivité des valeurs et de la connaissance. Paris: Fayard.

Boudon, Raymond . 1996. `The “Cognitivist Model”: A Generalized “Rational-choice Model”.' Rationality and Society 8(2): 123-150.

Campbell, Donald T. 1987. `Rationality and Utility from the Standpoint of Evolutionary Biology.' In Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology, ed. Robin M. Hogarth and Melvin W. Reder , 171-180. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Hayek, Friedrich A. 1937. `Economics and Knowledge.' Economica 4: 33-54.

Kirzner, Israel M. 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Koyre, Alexandre . 1966. Etudes galiléennes. Paris: Hermann.

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Lakatos, Imre . 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Langley, Pat , Herbert A. Simon , Gary L. Bradshaw and Jan M. Zitkow . 1987. Scientific Discovery: Computational Explorations of the Creative Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

11.

Mises, Ludwig von . 1966. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: Henry Regnery.

12.

Needham, R. 1975. `Polythetic Classification: Convergence and Consequences.' Man 10: 349-369.

13.

Nelson, Richard R. and Sidney G. Winter . 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

14.

Newell, Allen and Herbert A. Simon . 1972. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

15.

Popper, Karl R. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.

16.

Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

17.

Simon, Herbert A. 1977. Models of Discovery. Dordrecht: Reidel.

18.

Stigler, George J. 1961. `The Economics of Information.' Journal of Political Economy 69: 213-225.

19.

Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman . 1981. `The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.' Science 221: 453-458.

20.

Walras, Léon V. 1874. Eléments d'economie politique pure. Lausanne: L. Corbaz & Co.

21.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig . 1958. Philosophical Investigations, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.

FRAMES,INFERENCES AND RATIONALITY

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References