Granovetter and Soong's threshold model for collective behavior focuses on decision situations of action versus nonaction. To explain the number of active people, it assumes an exogenous distribution of behavioral thresholds in a given population of well-informed individuals. Ego's threshold is the necessary proportion of active persons for ego's choice of action. This article relates the threshold model to traditional diffusion hypotheses. It is shown that simple threshold distributions correspond with well-known hypotheses of social diffusion. The approach is illustrated by an analysis of data on participation in the Monday demonstrations in the East German city of Leipzig during the fall of 1989.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bass, F. M.1969. A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Science15:215-227.
2.
Braun, N.
1994. The threshold model revisited. University of Berne, Department of Sociology. Mimeo.
3.
Brown, L. A.
1981. Innovation diffusion: A new perspective. London: Methuen.
4.
Burt, R. S.1987. Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology92:1287-1335.
5.
Coleman, J. S.
1964. Introduction to mathematical sociology. New York: Free Press.
6.
Coleman, J. S.
1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
7.
Coleman, J. S.
, E. Katz, and H. Menzel. 1957. The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry20:253-269.
8.
Diekmann, A.
1990. Hazard rate models of social diffusion processes. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Sociological Association (ASA), Washington, August 11-15, 1990.
9.
Diekmann, A.1992. The log-logistic distribution as a model for social diffusion processes. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research51:285-290.
10.
Esser, H.
1993. Soziologie: Allgemeine Grundlagen. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
11.
Granovetter, M.1978. Threshold models for collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology83:1420-1443.
12.
Granovetter, M.
, and R. Soong. 1983. Threshold models of diffusion and collective behavior. Journal of Mathematical Sociology9:165-179.
13.
Granovetter, M.
, and R. Soong. 1986. Threshold models of interpersonal effects in consumer demand. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization7:83-99.
14.
Granovetter, M.
, and R. Soong. 1988. Threshold models of diversity: Chinese restaurants, residential segregation, and the spiral of silence. In Sociological methodology, edited by C. Clogg. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
Hamblin, R. L.
, R. B. Jacobsen, and J.L.L. Miller. 1973. A mathematical theory of social change. New York: John Wiley.
16.
Iannacone, L. R.1989. Bandwagons and the threat of chaos: Interpersonal effects revisited. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization11:431-442.
17.
Mahajan, V.
, and R. A. Peterson. 1985. Models for innovation diffusion. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
Marwell, G.
, and P. Oliver. 1993. The critical mass in collective action: A micro-social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Opp, K. D.1991. DDR '89. Zu den Ursachen einer spontanen Revolution. Koelner Zeitschrift fuer Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie43:302-321.
20.
Prosch, B.
, and M. Abraham. 1991. Die Revolution in der DDR. Eine strukturell-individualistische Erklaerungsskizze. Koelner Zeitschrift fuer Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie43:291-301.
21.
Raub, W.
, and T. Voss. 1981. Individuelles Handeln und gesellschaftliche Folgen. Darmstadt: Luchterhand.
22.
Rogers, E. M.
1983. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
23.
Schelling, T. C.1969. Models of segregation. American Economic Review59:488-493.
24.
Schelling, T. C.1971. Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology1:143-186.
25.
Weesie, J. 1988. Mathematical models for competition, cooperation, and social networks. Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.
