In this article, I develop a formal model of underclass behavior based explicitly on Tally's Corner, Elliot Liebow's classic ethnography of streetcorner men. In the model, a social norm requires husbands to provide a minimum level of family support. Disobedience to the norm generates cognitive dissonance, which induces a change in the husband's altruism toward his family. The analysis highlights the interdependence of “mainstream values” and underclass behavior: an increase in mainstream values may actually decrease the level of family support provided by low-income men.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Akerlof, George A.1980. A theory of social custom, of which unemployment may be one consequence. Quarterly Journal of Economics95:749-775.
2.
Akerlof, George A.1991. The economics of illusion. Economics and Politics1:1-15.
3.
Akerlof, George A.
, and William T. Dickens. 1982. The economic consequences of cognitive dissonance. American Economic Review72:307-319.
4.
Anderson, Elijah
. 1978. A place on the corner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Aronson, Elliot
. 1988. The social animal. New York: W.H. Freeman.
6.
Auletta, Ken
. 1982. The underclass. New York: Vintage Books.
7.
Becker, Gary S.
, and Kevin M. Murphy. 1988. A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy96:675-700.
8.
Coleman, James S.
1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
9.
Dickens, William T.1986. Crime and punishment again: The economic approach with a psychological twist. Journal of Public Economics30:97-107.
10.
Elster, Jon
. 1979. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in rationality and irrationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Elster, Jon
. 1986. The multiple self. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Elster, Jon
. 1989. The cement of society: A study of social order. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Festinger, Leon
. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14.
Hannerz, Ulf
. 1969. Soulside: Inquiries into ghetto culture and community. New York: Columbia University Press.
15.
Jencks, Christopher
. 1991. Is the American underclass growing? In The urban underclass, edited by C. Jencks and P. Peterson. Washington, DC: Brookings.
16.
Liebow, Elliot
. 1967. Tally's corner. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
17.
MacLeod, Jay
. 1987. Ain't no making it. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
18.
Mead, Lawrence M.1991. The new politics of the new poverty. Public Interest103:3-20.
19.
Merton, Robert K.
1968. Social theory and social structure. Enlarged 3d ed.New York: Free Press.
20.
Montgomery, James
. 1989. Is underclass behavior contagious? A rational choice analysis. Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research, Northwestern University, Working Paper No. 90-9, Evanston, IL.
21.
Montgomery, James
. 1992a. Pascal's wager and the limits of rational choice: A comment on Durkin and Greeley. Rationality and Society4:117-122.
22.
Montgomery, James
. 1992b. Induction vs. deduction in social science. Paper presented in panel discussion on “Integrating Sociological and Economic Perspectives on Organizations and Occupations” at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, August, Pittsburgh, PA.
23.
Myerson, Roger B.1992. On the value of game theory in social science. Rationality and Society4:62-73.
24.
Rabin, Matthew
. 1994. Cognitive dissonance and social change. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization23:177-194.
25.
Rainwater, Lee
. 1970. Behind ghetto walls. Chicago: Aldine.
26.
Rodman, Hyman
. 1963. The lower-class value stretch. Social Forces42:205-215.
27.
Schwartz, Joel
. 1991. The moral environment of the poor. Public Interest103:21-37.
28.
Stigler, George J.
, and Gary S. Becker. 1977. De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review67:76-90.
29.
Wilson, William J.
1987. The truly disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
