Dix, Robert
. 1984. Why revolutions succeed and fail. Polity16:423-446.
2.
Dix, Robert
. 1991. Eastern Europe's implications for revolutionary theory. Unpublished manuscript, Rice University.
3.
Farhi, F.
1990. States and urban-based revolutions: Iran and Nicaragua. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
4.
Goldstone, J. A.
1986. Revolutions and superpowers. In Superpowers and revolutions, edited by J. R. Adelman, 38-48. New York: Praeger.
5.
Goldstone, J. A.
1991. Revolution and rebellion in the early modern world. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
6.
Goodwin, J.
, and T. Skocpol. 1989. Explaining revolutions in the contemporary Third World. Politics & Society17:489-509.
7.
Gurr, T. R.
1970. Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
Hirschman, A. O.1993. Exit, voice, and the fate of the German Democratic Republic: An essay in conceptual history. World Politics45:173-203.
9.
Huntington, S. P.
1964. Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
Johnson, C.
1966. Revolutionary change. Boston: Little, Brown.
11.
Karklins, R.
, and R. Peterson. Forthcoming. Decision calculus of protesters and regimes: Eastern Europe1989. Journal of Politics.
12.
Kuran, T.1991. Now out of never: The element of surprise in the East European revolution of 1989. World Politics44:7-48.
13.
McDaniel, T.
1991. Autocracy: Modernization and revolution in Russia and Iran. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Opp, K.-D.
1993. Spontaneous revolutions: The case of East Germany in 1989. In United Germany and the new Europe, edited by J. D. Kurtz, 11-30. Cheltenham, England: Elgar.
15.
Popkin, S.
1979. The rational peasant. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
16.
Shugart, M. S.1989. Patterns of revolution. Theory and Society18:249-271.
17.
Skocpol, T.
1979. States and social revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Smelser, N.
1963. Theory of collective behavior. New York: Free Press.
19.
Taylor, M.
, ed. 1988. Rationality and revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Tilly, C.
1978. From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21.
Tullock, G.1971. The paradox of revolution. Public Choice1:89-99.
22.
Wickham-Crowley, T.1991. A qualitative approach to Latin American revolutions. International Journal of Comparative Sociology32:82-109.
