Innumerable scholars have addressed issues of justice. Disciplinary boundaries, however, have often separated discourse on the topic. This article compares selected philosophical accounts of justice with social psychological theory and empirical research on the same. At the core of such comparisons is the distinction between prescriptions for a just society and actual empirical beliefs about what is fair. This distinction colors the analysis of the paradoxical relationship between justice and self-interest evident to some extent in both philosophical and social psychological accounts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, J. Stacy
. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology2:267-299.
2.
Alves, W. M.
, and Peter H. Rossi. 1978. Who should get what? Fairness judgments of the distribution of earnings. American Journal of Sociology84:541-565.
3.
Austin, William
. 1979. Justice, freedom and self-interest in intergroup conflict. In The social psychology of intergroup relations, edited by W. G. Austin and S. Worchel, 121-142. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
4.
Austin, William
. 1980. Friendship and fairness: Effects of type of relationship and task performance on choice of distribution rules. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin6:402-408.
5.
Barry, Brian
. 1989. Theories of justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Berger, Joseph
, Bernard P. Cohen, and Morris Zelditch, Jr. 1972. Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status value formation. In Sociological theories in progress, edited by J. Berger, M. Zelditch, and Bo Anderson, 119-146. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7.
Berger, Joseph
, Hamit Fisek, Robert Z. Norman, and David G. Wagner. 1983. The formation of reward expectations in status situations. In Equity theory: Psychological and sociological perspectives, edited by D. Messick and K. S. Cook, 127-168. New York: Praeger.
8.
Blau, Peter
. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
9.
Brickman, Philip
. 1977. Preference for inequality. Sociometry40:303-310.
10.
Brickman, Philip
, Robert Folger, E. Goode, and Y. Schul. 1981. Microjustice and macrojustice. In The justice motive in social behavior, edited by M. J. Lerner and S. C. Lerner, 173-202. New York: Plenum.
11.
Cohen, Ronald L.1974. Mastery and justice in laboratory dyads: A revision and extension of equity theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology29:464-474.
12.
Cohen, Ronald L.
1982. Perceiving justice: An attributional perspective. In Equity and justice in social behavior, edited by J. Greenberg and R. L. Cohen, 119-160. New York: Academic Press.
13.
Cohen, Ronald L.
, and Jerald Greenberg. 1982. The justice concept in social psychology. In Equity and justice in social behavior, edited by J. Greenberg and R. L. Cohen, 1-34. New York: Academic Press.
14.
Cook, Karen S.
, and Karen A. Hegtvedt. 1983. Distributive justice, equity, and equality. Annual Review of Sociology9:217-241.
15.
Cook, Karen S.
, and Karen A. Hegtvedt. 1986. Justice and power: An exchange analysis. In Justice in social relations, edited by H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, and J. Greenberg, 19-42. New York: Plenum.
16.
Cook, Karen S.
, and Toshio Yamagishi. 1983. Social determinants of equity judgments: The problem of multidimensional input. In Equity theory: Psychological and sociological perspectives, edited by D. M. Messick and K. S. Cook, 95-126. New York: Praeger.
17.
Deutsch, Morton
. 1975. Equity, equality, and need: What determines what value will be used as the basis for distributive justice?Journal of Social Issues31:137-150.
18.
Deutsch, Morton
. 1985. Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
Eckhoff, Torstein
. 1974. Justice: Its determinants in social interaction. Rotterdam: Rotterdam Press.
20.
Feather, N. T.
, and M. P. O'Driscoll. 1980. Observers' reactions to an equal or equitable allocator in relation to allocator input, causal attributions and value importance. European Journal of Social Psychology10:107-129.
21.
Frolich, Norman
, Joe A. Oppenheimer, and Cheryl L. Eavey. 1987. Choices of principles of distributive justice in experimental groups. American Journal of Political Science31:606-636.
22.
Gilligan, Carol
. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Greenberg, Jerald
. 1983. Overcoming egocentric bias in perceived fairness through self-awareness. Social Psychology Quarterly46:152-157.
24.
Heath, Anthony
. 1976. Rational choice and social exchange: A critique of exchange theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Hegtvedt, Karen A.1987. When rewards are scarce: Equal or equitable distributions?Social Forces66:183-207.
26.
Hegtvedt, Karen A.1990. The effects of relationship structure on emotional reactions to inequity. Social Psychology Quarterly53:214-228.
27.
Hochschild, J. L.
1981. What's fair? American beliefs about distributive justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
Homans, George C.
[1961] 1974. Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
29.
Jackson, Linda A.
, Lawrence A. Messé, and John E. Hunter. 1985. Gender role and distributive justice behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology6:329-343.
30.
Jasso, Guillermina
. 1978. On the justice of earnings: A new specification of the justice evaluation function. American Journal of Sociology83:1398-1419.
31.
Jasso, Guillermina
, and Peter H. Rossi. 1977. Distributive justice and earned income. American Sociological Research42:639-651.
32.
Kahn, A.1972. Reactions to generosity or stinginess from an intelligent or stupid work partner: A test of equity theory in a direct exchange relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology21:116-123.
33.
Kahn, A.
, V. E. O'Leary, J. E. Krulewitz, and H. Lamm. 1980. Equity and equality: Male and female means to a just end. Basic and Applied Social Psychology1:173-197.
34.
Kahn, A.
, R. E. Nelson, W. Gaeddert, and J. L. Hearn. 1982. The justice process: Deciding upon equity or equality. Social Psychology Quarterly45:3-8.
35.
Karniol, R.
, and D. T. Miller. 1981. Morality and the development of conceptions of justice. In The justice motive in social behavior, edited by M. J. Lerner and S. C. Lerner, 73-90. New York: Plenum.
36.
Kernis, M. H.
, and H. T. Reis. 1984. Self-consciousness, self-awareness, and justice in reward allocation. Journal of Personality52:58-70.
37.
Kluegel, James R.
, and Eliot R. Smith. 1986. Beliefs about inequality: Americans'views of what is and what ought to be. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
38.
Leung, Kwok
, and Michael H. Bond. 1984. The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology47:793-804.
39.
Leventhal, Gerald S.
1976. Fairness in social relations. In Contemporary topics in social psychology, edited by J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, and R. C. Carson, 211-239. New Jersey: General Learning Press.
40.
Leventhal, Gerald S.
, J. Karuza, Jr., and W. R. Fry. 1980. Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In Justice and social interaction, edited by G. Mikula, 167-218. New York: Springer-Verlag.
41.
Leventhal, Gerald S.
, and James W. Michaels. 1969. Extending the equity model: Perceptions of inputs and allocations of reward as a function of duration and quantity of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology12:303-309.
42.
Lind, E. Allan
, and Tom R. Tyler. 1988. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
43.
Major, Brenda
, and J. B. Adams. 1983. Role of gender interpersonal orientation and self presentation in distributive justice behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45:598-608.
44.
Major, Brenda
, and Kay Deaux. 1982. Individual differences in justice behavior. In Equity and justice in social behavior, edited by J. Greenberg and R. L. Cohen, 43-76. New York: Plenum.
45.
Markovsky, Barry
. 1988. Anchoring justice. Social Psychology Quarterly51:213-224.
46.
Martin, Joanne E.
, and M. M. Petersen. 1987. Two-tier wage structures: Implications for equity theory. Academy of Management Journal30:297-315.
47.
McClintock, Charles G.
, and Eddy Van Avermaet. 1982. Social values and rules of fairness. In Cooperation and helping behavior: Theories and research, edited by V. J. Derlega and J. Grzelak, 44-73. New York: Academic Press.
48.
McClintock, Charles G.1972. Social motivation - A set of propositions. Behavioral Science17:438-454.
49.
Meeker, Barbara F.
, and Gregory C. Elliott. 1987. Counting the costs: Equity and the allocation of negative group products. Social Psychology Quarterly50:9-15.
50.
Messick, David M.
, and Kenneth P. Sentis. 1979. Fairness and preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology15:416-434.
51.
Miller, David
. 1976. Social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52.
Mirels, H. L.
, and J. B. Garrett. 1971. The Protestant ethic as a personality variable. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology36:40-44.
53.
Mirowsky, J.1987. The psycho-economics of feeling underpaid: Distributive justice and the earnings of husbands and wives. American Journal of Sociology92:1404-1434.
54.
Morgan, William R.
, and Jack Sawyer. 1967. Bargaining, expectations and the preference for equality over equity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology6:139-149.
55.
Murphy-Berman, V.
, J. J. Berman, P. Singh, A. Pachauri, and P. Kumar. 1984. Factors affecting allocation to needy and meritorious recipients: A cross cultural comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46:1267-1272.
56.
Nozick, Robert
. 1974. Anarchy, state and utopia. New York: Basic Books.
57.
O'Malley, Michael N.1983. Interpersonal and intrapersonal justice: The effect of subject and confederate outcomes on evaluations of fairness. European Journal of Social Psychology13:121-128.
58.
O'Malley, Michael N.
, and D. Becker. 1984. Removing egocentric bias: The relevance of distress cues to evaluation of fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin10:235-242.
59.
O'Malley, Michael N.
, and Daniel K. Davies. 1984. Equity and affect: The effects of relative performance and moods on resource allocation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology5:273-282.
60.
Prentice, Deborah A.
, and Faye Crosby. 1987. The importance of context for assessing deserving. In Social comparison, social justice, and relative deprivation, edited by J. C. Masters and W. P. Smith, 165-182. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61.
Rawls, John
. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
Reis, Harry T.
1981. Self presentation and distributive justice. In Impression management theory and social psychological theory, edited by J. T. Tedeschi, 269-291. New York: Academic Press.
63.
Reis, Harry T.
1984. The multidimensionality of justice. In The sense of injustice, edited by R. Folger, 25-62. New York: Plenum.
64.
Reis, Harry T.
1986. Levels of interest in the study of interpersonal justice. In Justice in social relations, edited by H. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, and J. Greenberg, 187-210. New York: Plenum.
65.
Reis, Harry T.
, and Linda A. Jackson. 1981. Sex differences in reward allocation: Subjects, partners, and tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology40:465-478.
66.
Robinson, Robert V.
, and Wendell Bell. 1978. Equality, success, and social justice in England and the United States. American Sociological Review43:125-143.
67.
Rusbult, Caryl E.
, David Lowery, Michael L. Hubbard, Orly J. Maravankin, and Michael Neises. 1988. Impact of employee mobility and employee performance on the allocation of rewards under conditions of constraint. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology54:605-615.
68.
Schwinger, Thomas
. 1980. Just allocation of goods: Decisions among three principles. In Justice and social interaction, edited by G. Mikula, 95-125. New York: Springer-Verlag.
69.
Shapiro, E. G.1975. Effect of expectations of future interaction on reward allocation in dyads: Equity or equality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology31:873-880.
70.
Sheplak, Norma J.
, and Duane F. Alwin. 1986. Beliefs about inequality and perceptions of distributive justice. American Sociological Review51:30-46.
71.
Solomon, Robert C.
, and Mark C. Murphy, eds. 1990. What is justice? Classic and contemporary readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72.
Stake, J. E.1983. Factors in reward distribution: Allocator motive, gender, and Protestant ethic endorsement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology44:410-418.
73.
Steil, Janice M.1983. The response to injustice: Effects of varying levels of social support and position of advantage or disadvantage. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology19:239-253.
74.
Stolte, John F.1983. The legitimation of structural inequality: Reformulation and test of the self-evaluation argument. American Sociological Review48:331-342.
75.
Stolte, John F.1987. The formation of justice norms. American Sociological Review52:774-784.
76.
Szirmai, A.
1986. Inequality observed. Enschede, the Netherlands: Febodnk.
77.
Tallman, Irving
, and Marilyn Ihinger-Tallman. 1979. Values, distributive justice, and social change. American Sociological Review44:216-235.
78.
Törnblom, Kjell Y.
, and Dan R. Jonsson. 1985. Subrules of the equality and contributions principles: Their perceived fairness in distribution and retribution. Social Psychology Quarterly48:249-261.
79.
Verba, Sidney
, and Gary R. Orren. 1985. Equality in America: The view from the top. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80.
Walster, Elaine
, Ellen Berscheid, and George W. Walster. 1978. Equity: theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
81.
Watts, B. L.
, R. R. Vallacher, and L. A. Messé. 1982. Toward understanding sex differences in pay allocations: Agency, communion, and reward distribution behavior. Sex Roles12:1175-1188.
82.
Wittig, M. A.
, G. Marks, and G. A. Jones. 1981. Luck versus effort attributions: Effect on reward allocations to self and other. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin7:71-78.
83.
Yamagishi, Toshio
. 1984. Development of distribution rules in small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46:1069-1078.
