This article explores the implications of the use of time (the scarce input) in voluntary associations where members are rational maximizers but use time both “egoistically” and by “helping” others. The model leads to a picture of individuals subject to an internal prisoners' dilemma. In addition, the association is assumed to operate a division of labor where the use of “egoistic” time by one member impacts upon the utility of others. The interplay of three interrelated games is studied and implications for the use of time in associations are derived.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbott, A.
, and J. Forrest. 1986. Optimal matching methods for historical sequences. Journal of Interdisciplinary History16:471-494.
2.
Abell, P.
1987. The syntax of social life. The theory and method of comparative narratives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
Abell, P.
1988. Establishing support systems for industrial cooperatives: case studies from the Third World. Aldershot: Avebury.
4.
Abell, P.
, and N. Mahoney. 1988. Small scale cooperatives in developing countries. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
5.
Axelrod, R.
1984. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
6.
Buchanan, J. M.1965. An economic theory of clubs, Economica, 32:1-14.
7.
Coleman, J.S.
1986. Individual interests and collective action. Selected essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Elster, J.
1982. The multiple self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Hardin, R.1982. The tragedy of the commons, Science162:1243-1248.
10.
Lindenberg, S.1985. An assessment of the new political economy: its potential for the social sciences and for sociology in particular. Sociological Theory3 (no. 1): 99-113.
11.
Margolis, H.
1982. Selfishness, altruism and rationality. A theory of social choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Olson, M.
1965. The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Taylor, M.
1987. The possibility of cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
