The aim of the study is to contribute, theoretically and empirically, to an improved understanding of the social processes and mechanisms generating a citizen’s decisions regarding electoral participation. It seeks to contribute to a solution for the legendary paradox of electoral participation based on formalized social-psychological dual process theories by integrating the Weberian typology of rationalities and related social action into a comprehensive explanation of voter turnout. The empirical analysis, based on two German surveys carried out in 1998 and 2017, reveals that the instrumentally rational voting (purposively rational action) emphasized in the classic rational choice theories used in economic electoral research is rather a special case among modal types of action such as habitual voting (traditional action), norm-related voting (norm-guided action), and voting due to value rationality (value-rational action). Most voters vote out of habit and based on norms and values, while purely purposive-rational voting is more of a special case.
AchenCH (2002) Parental Socialization and Rational Party Identification. Political Behavior24(2): 151–170.
2.
AartsHDijksterhuisA (2000) Habits as Knowledge Structures: Automaticity in Goal-Directed Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology78(1): 53–63.
3.
AiCNortonEC (2003) Interaction Terms in Logit and Probit Models. Economics Letters80(1): 123–129.
4.
AldrichJH (1993) Rational Choice and Turnout. American Journal of Political Science37(1): 246–278.
5.
AllisonPD (1999) Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficients across Groups. Sociological Methods and Research28(2): 186–208.
6.
BeckerR (2002) Voter Participation in the 1998 Bundestag Elections: A Theoretical Modification and Empirical Application of Downs’ Theory of Voter Participation. German Politics11(2): 39–87.
7.
BeckerR (2004) Political Efficacy and Voter Turnouts in East and West Germany. German Politics13(2): 317–340.
8.
BelliRFTraugottMWYoungM (1999) Reducing Vote Overreporting in Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly63(1): 90–108.
9.
BlaisA (2000) To Vote or Not to Vote. The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittsburg Press.
10.
BlaisAAchenCH (2019) Civic Duty and Voter Turnout. Political Behavior41(2): 473–497.
11.
BlaisAYoungR (1999) Why do People Vote? An Experiment in Rationality. Public Choice99(1): 39–55.
12.
BlaisAGalaisC (2016) Measuring the Civic Duty to Vote: A Proposal. Electoral Studies41(1): 60–69.
13.
BlaisADaoustJ-FDassonevilleR (2019) What is the Cost of Voting?Electoral Studies59(1): 145–157.
14.
BrennanGHamlinA (1998) Expressive Voting and Electoral Equilibrium. Public Choice95(1): 149–175.
15.
BrunkGG (1980) The Impact of Rational Participation Models on Voting Attitudes. Public Choice35(5): 549–564.
16.
CampbellAGurinGMillerWE (1954) The Voter Decides. New York: Wiley.
17.
CancelaJGeysB (2016) Explaining Voter Turnout: A Meta-Analysis of National and Subnational Elections. Electoral Studies42(2): 264–275.
18.
CastanheiraM (2003) Victory Margins and the Paradox of Voting. Journal of Political Economy19(4): 817–841.
19.
ColomerJM (1991) Benefits and Costs of Voting. Electoral Studies10(4): 313–325.
20.
DaltonRJ (1984) Cognitive Mobilization and Partisan Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Journal of Politics46(1): 264–284.
21.
DiekmannA (2022) Rational Choice Sociology: Heuristic Potential, Applications, and Limitations. In: GërxhaniKDe GraafWRaubW (eds.) Handbook of Sociological Science. Contributions to Rigorous Sociology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 100–119.
22.
DowdingK (2005) Is it Rational to Vote? Five Types of Answer and a Suggestion. British Journal of Politics and International Relations7(3): 442–459.
23.
DowdingK (2017) Rational Choice Theory and Voting. In: FisherJFieldhouseEFranklinMN (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion.London: Routledge, pp. 30–40.
24.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
25.
EdlinAGelmanAKaplanN (2007) Voting as a Rational Choice. Why and How People Vote to Improve the Well-Being of Others. Rationality and Society19(3): 293–314.
26.
EsserH (2001) Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. Bd. 6: Sinn und Kultur. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
27.
FazioRH (1990) Multiple Processes by Which Attitudes Guide Behavior: The Mode Model as an Integrative Framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology23(1): 75–109.
28.
FeddersenTSandroniA (2006) A Theory of Participation in Elections. American Economic Review96(4): 1271–1282.
29.
FrançoisAGergaudO (2019) Is Civic Duty the Solution to the Paradox of Voting?Public Choice180(3/4): 257–283.
30.
GalaisCBlaisA (2016) Beyond Rationalization: Voting Out of Duty or Expressing Duty After Voting?International Political Science Review37(2): 213–229.
31.
GerberASGreenDP (1999) Does Canvassing Increase Voter Turnout? A Field Experiment. PNAS96(19): 10939–10942.
32.
GESIS (2012) German General Social Survey 1998. ZA3000 Data file Version 2.0.0. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. DOI:10.4232/1.11362.
33.
GESIS (2015a) German General Social Survey 2008. ZA4600 Data file Version 2.1.0. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. DOI:10.4232/1.12345.
34.
GESIS (2015b) Short-term Campaign Panel (GLES 2009). ZA5305 Data file Version 5.0.0. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. DOI:10.4232/1.12198.
35.
GESIS (2016) Intermediate inquiry 2015 of Long-term Panel started in 2005, 2009 and 2013 and of Short-term Campaign Panel 2013 (GLES). ZA5759 Data file Version 1.0.0. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. DOI:10.4232/1.12491.
36.
GESIS (2019a) German General Social Survey 2018. ZA5270 Data file Version 2.0.0. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. DOI:10.4232/1.13250.
37.
GESIS. (2019b) Short-term Campaign Panel (GLES 2017). ZA6804 Data file Version 7.0.0. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. DOI:10.4232/1.13323.
38.
GeysB (2016) ‘Rational’ Theories of Voter Turnout: A Review. Political Studies Review4(1): 16–35.
39.
GidengliEWassHValasteM (2016) Political Socialization and Voting: The Parent– Child Link in Turnout. Political Research Quarterly69(2): 373–383.
40.
GoldfarbRSSigelmanL (2010) Does “Civic Duty” Solve the Rational Choice Voter Turnout Puzzle?Journal of Theoretical Politics22(3): 275–300.
41.
GrofmanB (1993) Is Turnout the Paradox That Ate Rational Choice Theory? In: GrofmanB (ed.) Information, Participation, and Choice. An Economic Theory of Democracy in Perspective. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, pp. 93–103.
42.
GuttmannJMHilgerNShachmuroveY (1994) Voting as Investment vs. Voting as Consumption: New Evidence. Kyklos47(2): 197–207.
43.
JankowskiR (2007) Altruism and the Decision to Vote: Explaining and Testing High Voter Turnout. Rationality and Society19(1): 5–34.
44.
KaaseMMarshA (1979) Political Action. A Theoretical Perspective. In: BarnesSHKaaseMAllerbeckKR (eds.) Political Action. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 27–56.
45.
KanazawaS (1998) A Possible Solution to the Paradox of Voter Turnout. The Journal of Politics60(4): 974–995.
46.
KanazawaS (2000) A New Solution to the Collective Action Problem: The Paradox of Voter Turnout. American Sociological Review65(3): 433–442.
47.
KarpJABrockingtonD (2005) Social Desirability and Response Validity: A Comparative Analysis of Overreporting Voter Turnout in Five Countries. Journal of Politics67(3): 825–840.
48.
KatoshJPTraugottMW (1982) Costs and Values in the Calculus of Voting. American Journal of Political Science26(2): 361–376.
49.
KnackSKropfME (1998) For Shame! The Effect of Community Cooperative Context on the Probability of Voting. Political Psychology19(3): 585–599.
50.
KronT (2010). Zeitgenössische soziologische Theorien. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
51.
KronebergCYaishMStockéV (2010) Norms and Rationality in Electoral Participation and in the Rescue of Jews in WWII. An Application of the Model of Frame Selection. Rationality and Society22(1): 3–36.
52.
LazarsfeldPFBerelsonBGaudetH (1944) The People’s Choice—How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
53.
LindenbergS (1977) Individuelle Effekte, kollektive Phänomene und das Problem der Transformation. In: EichnerKHabermehlW (eds.) Probleme der Erklärung sozialen Verhaltens. Meisenheim: Anton Hain, pp. 46–64.
54.
LindenbergS (2006) Prosocial Behavior, Solidarity and Goal-Framing Processes. In: FetchenhauerDFlacheABuunkBLindenbergS (eds.) Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior. An Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives. Amsterdam: Kluwer, pp. 23–44.
55.
LipsetSMRokkanS (1967) Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments. An Introduction. In: LipsetSMRokkanS (eds.) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Collier-Macmillan, pp. 1–64.
56.
LoewenPJDawesCT (2012) The Heritability of Duty and Voter Turnout. Political Psychology33(3): 363–373.
57.
LongJSFreeseJ (2006) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
58.
MüllerW (1999) Class Cleavages in Party Preferences in Germany: Old and New. In: EvansG (ed.) The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 137–180.
59.
NieNHVerbaSPetrocikJR (1979) The Changing American Voter. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
NiemiRG (1976) Cost of Voting and Nonvoting. Public Choice27(Fall): 115–119.
61.
NorkusZ (2000) Max Weber’s Interpretive Sociology and Rational Choice Approach. Rationality and Society12(3): 259–282.
62.
OhrDRattingerH (1993) Zur Beziehung zwischen in der Vorwahlzeit erhobenen Wahlabsichten und Wahlergebnissen. In: GabrielOWTroitzschKG (eds.) Wahlen in Zeiten des Umbruchs.Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 3–25.
63.
OrmelJLindenbergSSteverinkNVerbruggeLM (1999) Subjective Well-Being and Social Production Functions. Social Indicators Research46(1): 61–90.
64.
RaubWBuskensVvan AssenMALM (2011) Micro–Macro Links and Microfoundations in Sociology. Journal of Mathematical Sociology35(1): 1–25.
65.
RikerWHOrdeshookPC (1968) A Theory of the Calculus of Voting. The American Political Science Review62(1): 25–42.
66.
SelbPMunzertS (2013) Voter Overrepresentation, Vote Misreporting, and Turnout Bias in Postelection Surveys. Electoral Studies32(1): 186–196.
67.
StiglerGJ (1972) Economic Competition and Political Competition. Public Choice13(1): 91–106.
68.
StroebeW (2008) Wann und wie beeinflussen Normen das Verhalten: Eine sozial-kognitive Analyse. In: DiekmannAEichnerKSchmidtP (eds.) Rational Choice: Theoretische Analysen und empirische Resultate.Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 101–118.
69.
WeberM (1922) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
