This paper contributes to the literature on Relative Risk Aversion theory in two ways: first, by considering that the effect of time preferences may differ according to both children’s gender and social origin; second, by exploring this possibility for different educational outcomes: upper secondary school choices and university enrollment. We use data of the Survey of Household Income and Wealth, which contains questions specifically addressed to capture an individual’s time discounting preference, to further explore the association between time discounting preference and the effect of social origin on educational outcomes in Italy. In line with prior research, we find that time preferences only have a meaningful effect among children of lowly educated parents. But such an effect, in turn, differs by gender: parental time preferences matter more for sons than for daughters of lowly educated parents. This gender effect is found both for upper secondary choices and for entry into higher education.
AlbaneseGde BlasioGSestitoP (2017) Trust, risk and time preferences: evidence from survey data. International Review of Economics64(4): 367–388. DOI: 10.1007/s12232-017-0282-7.
2.
AmrheinVGreenlandSMcShaneB (2019) Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature567(7748): 305–307. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9.
3.
AndradeSBThomsenJ-P (2017) Micro-educational reproduction. Social Forces96(2): 717–750. DOI: 10.1093/sf/sox062.
4.
AndreoniJSprengerC (2012) Risk preferences are not time preferences. American Economic Review102(7): 3357–3376. DOI: 10.1257/aer.102.7.3357.
5.
ArgentinG (2010) University pathways and graduate labour market outcomes in Italy: what matters where?Italian Journal of Sociology of Education2(2): 107–147.
6.
ArrowKJ (1971) Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. Chicago, IL: Markham.
7.
BaroneC (2011) Some things never change. Sociology of Education84(2): 157–176. DOI: 10.1177/0038040711402099.
8.
BaroneCTriventiMAssirelliG (2018) Explaining social inequalities in access to university: a test of rational choice mechanisms in Italy. European Sociological Review34(5): 554–569. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcy028.
9.
BaroneCBargKIchouM (2021) Relative risk aversion models: how plausible are their assumptions?Rationality and Society33(2): 143–175.
10.
BarskyRBJusterFTKimballMS, et al. (1997) Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: an experimental approach in the health and retirement study. The Quarterly Journal of Economics112(2): 537–579. DOI: 10.1162/003355397555280.
11.
BaumCF (2007) Ivreg2: Stata Module for Extended Instrumental Variables/2SLS, GMM and AC/HAC, LIML and K-Class Regression. Statistical Software Components S425401. Boston, MA: Boston College Department of Economics. Components S425401.
12.
BeckerGS (1981) Altruism in the family and selfishness in the market place. Economica48(189): 1–15. DOI: 10.2307/2552939.
13.
BellaniDArpinoBVignoliD (2021) Time preferences and fertility: evidence from Italy. Demographic Research44(50): 1185–1228. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2021.44.50.
14.
BernardiFChakhaiaLLeopoldL (2017) ‘Sing Me a Song with Social Significance’: the (Mis)use of statistical significance testing in European sociological research. European Sociological Review33(1): 1–15. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcw047.
15.
BoudonR (1974) Education, Opportunity, and Social Inequality: Changing Prospects in Western Society. London, UK: John Wiley.
BreenRYaishM (2006) Testing the Breen-Goldthorpe model of educational decision making. In: MorganSLGruskyDBFieldsGS (eds) Fields Mobility and Inequality: Frontiers of Research from Sociology and Economics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 232–258.
18.
BreenRLuijkxRMullerW, et al. (2009) Long-term trends in educational inequality in Europe: class inequalities and gender differences. European Sociological Review26(1): 31–48. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcp001.
19.
BreenRvan de WerfhorstHGJaegerMM (2014) Deciding under doubt: a theory of risk aversion, time discounting preferences, and educational decision-making. European Sociological Review30(2): 258–270. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcu039.
20.
Cedefop (2014) Vocational Education and Training in Italy 2014. Luxembourg City, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
21.
ChecchiDFiorioCVLeonardiM (2014) Parents’ risk aversion and children’s educational attainment. Labour Economics30: 164–175. DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2014.04.001.
22.
ChiapporiP-AIyigunMWeissY (2008) Investment in Schooling and the Marriage Market. Working Paper No.156. Cambridge, MA: Center for International Development at Harvard University.
23.
DaviesRHeinesenEHolmA (2002) The relative risk aversion hypothesis of educational choice. Journal of Population Economics15(4): 683–713. DOI: 10.1007/s001480100087.
24.
De PaolaMGioiaF (2017) Does patience matter in marriage stability? Some evidence from Italy. Review of Economics of the Household15(2): 549–577. DOI: 10.1007/s11150-014-9275-4.
25.
DiPreteTABuchmannC (2006) Gender-specific trends in the value of education and the emerging gender gap in college completion. Demography43(1): 1–24. DOI: 10.1353/dem.2006.0003.
26.
DiPreteTABuchmannC (2013) The Rise of Women: The Growing Gender Gap in Education and what it Means for American Schools. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
27.
Eurostat (2016) Age of Young People Leaving Their Parental Household. Luxembourg City, Luxembourg: Eurostat Statistics Explained.
28.
Eurydice (2006) Higher Education Governance in Europe. Policies, Structures Funding and Academic Staff. Brussels, Belgium: Eurydice.
29.
FernándezR (2008) Culture and economics. In: DurlaufSNBlumeLE (eds) In the New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. 2nd edition. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1229–1236.
30.
FrederickSLoewensteinGO’donoghueT (2002) Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. Journal of Economic Literature40(2): 351–401. DOI: 10.1257/002205102320161311.
31.
FreeneyYO'ConnellM (2010) Wait for it: delay-discounting and academic performance among an Irish adolescent sample. Learning and Individual Differences20(3): 231–236. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.12.009.
32.
FreeseJPowellB (1999) Sociobiology, status, and parental investment in sons and daughters: testing the Trivers‐Willard hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology104(6): 1704–1743. DOI: 10.1086/210221.
33.
GarritzmannJL (2016) The Political Economy of Higher Education Finance: The Politics of Tuition Fees and Subsidies in OECD Countries, 1945–2015. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
GreeneWH (2003) Econometric Analysis. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
35.
GundertSMayerKU (2010) Gender segregation in training and social mobility of women in West Germany. European Sociological Review28(1): 59–81. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcq048.
36.
HällstenM (2010) The structure of educational decision making and consequences for inequality: a Swedish test case. American Journal of Sociology116(3): 806–854. DOI: 10.1086/655751.
37.
HeckmanJPintoRSavelyevP (2013) Understanding the mechanisms through which an influential early childhood program boosted adult outcomes. American Economic Review103(6): 2052–2086. DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.6.2052.
38.
HedströmPSternC (2008) Rational choice and sociology. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. 2nd edition. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
39.
IoannidisJPA (2019) The importance of predefined rules and prespecified statistical analyses. Jama321(21): 2067–2068. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.4582.
40.
JonssonJO (1999) Explaining sex differences in educational choice an empirical assessment of a rational choice model. European Sociological Review15(4): 391–404. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018272.
41.
JonssonJOGruskyDBDi CarloM, et al. (2009) Microclass mobility: social reproduction in four countries. American Journal of Sociology114(4): 977–1036. DOI: 10.1086/596566.
42.
KahnemanDTverskyA (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica47: 263–291.
43.
KimCTamboriniCRSakamotoA (2015) Field of study in college and lifetime earnings in the United States. Sociology of Education88(4): 320–339. DOI: 10.1177/0038040715602132.
44.
KorberMOeschD (2019) Vocational versus general education: employment and earnings over the life course in Switzerland. Advances in Life Course Research40: 1–13.
45.
LeeNCKrabbendamLDekkerS, et al. (2012) Academic motivation mediates the influence of temporal discounting on academic achievement during adolescence. Trends in Neuroscience and Education1(1): 43–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.tine.2012.07.001.
46.
LeonardiM (2007) Do parents risk aversion and wealth explain secondary school choice?Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia2: 177–206.
47.
ManacordaMMorettiE (2006) Why do most Italian youths live with their parents? Intergenerational transfers and household structure. Journal of the European Economic Association4(4): 800–829. DOI: 10.1162/JEEA.2006.4.4.800.
48.
MussidaCPicchioM (2014) The gender wage gap by education in Italy. The Journal of Economic Inequality12(1): 117–147. DOI: 10.1007/s10888-013-9242-y.
49.
NeedADe JongU (2001) Educational differentials in the Netherlands. Rationality and Society13(1): 71–98. DOI: 10.1177/104346301013001003.
50.
OECD (2015) Education at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
51.
OngaroFMazzucoSMeggiolaroS (2009) Economic consequences of union dissolution in Italy: findings from the European community household panel. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie25(1): 45–65. DOI: 10.1007/s10680-008-9157-7.
52.
PrelecDLoewensteinG (1998) The red and the black: mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Science17(1): 4–28. DOI: 10.1287/mksc.17.1.4.
53.
SchleichJGassmannXMeissnerT, et al. (2019) A large-scale test of the effects of time discounting, risk aversion, loss aversion, and present bias on household adoption of energy-efficient technologies. Energy Economics80: 377–393.
54.
StockéV (2007) Explaining educational decision and effects of families’ social class position: an empirical test of the Breen Goldthorpe model of educational attainment. European Sociological Review23(4): 505–519. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcm014.
55.
StockéV (2011) Educational Aspirations and Inequality in Educational Opportunity: The Difference between Realistic and Idealistic Aspirations.” Spring Meeting of the ISA RC28. Colchester, UK: University of Essex.
56.
TosiM (2017) Age norms, family relationships, and home leaving in Italy. Demographic Research36: 281–306. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.9.
57.
Van de WerfhorstHGHofstedeS (2007) Cultural capital or relative risk aversion? Two mechanisms for educational inequality compared. The British Journal of Sociology58(3): 391–415. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00157.x.
58.
WilsonRK (2011) The contribution of behavioral economics to political science. Annual Review of Political Science14: 201–223. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-041309-114513.
59.
WölfelOHeineckG (2012) Parental risk attitudes and children’s secondary school track choice. Economics of Education Review31(5): 727–743. DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.05.004.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
