Numerous researches have indicated that men’s and women’s cooperation varied from no differences to significant differences under the influence of different contextual characteristics. In this study, we investigated how social factors together with a gender composition of a group affected gender differences in cooperation. We found that mixed-sex groups were the most effective in cooperation. At the same time, cooperation level in same-sex groups varied significantly. Besides, in same-sex groups, men demonstrated a higher level of trust and gratitude than women. Among women, in same-sex groups, a tendency toward mutual distrust and competition was revealed more often than among men.
AndreoniJHarbaughWTVesterlundL (2010) Altruism in experiments. In: DurlufSNBlumeLE (eds) Behavioural and Experimental Economics. New York: Springer, pp. 6–13.
2.
AronsonE (1972) The Social Animal. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
3.
BabkinaTMyagkovMLukinovaE, et al. (2016) Choice of the group increases intra-cooperation. In: Proceedings of the CEUR third workshop on experimental economics and machine learning co-located with the 13th international conference on concept lattices and their applications (Vol. 1627), Moscow, 18 July, pp. 13–23. Available at: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/77758/1/paper1.pdf
4.
BaileyDHWinegardBOxfordJ, et al. (2012) Sex differences in in-group cooperation vary dynamically with competitive conditions and outcomes. Evolutionary Psychology10(1): 102–119.
5.
BallietDLiNPMacfarlanSJ, et al. (2011) Sex differences in cooperation: a meta-analytic review of social dilemmas. Psychological Bulletin137(6): 881–909.
6.
BecchettiLAntoniGDFailloM, et al. (2011) The economic value of a meeting: evidence from an investment game experiment. Rationality and Society23(4): 403–426.
7.
BelolipetskiiAAKozitsinIV (2017) Dynamic variant of mathematical model of collective behavior. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International56(3): 385–396.
8.
Ben-NerAPuttermanLKongF, et al. (2004) Reciprocity in a two-part dictator game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization53: 333–352.
9.
BerkmanETLukinovaEMenshikovI, et al. (2015) Sociality as a natural mechanism of public goods provision. PLoS ONE10(3): e0119685.
10.
BowlbyJ (1969) Attachment and Loss: Volume. 1—Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
11.
BussDM (1995) Psychological sex differences: origins through selection. American Psychologist50: 164–168.
12.
CharnessGRustichiniA (2011) Gender differences in cooperation with group membership. Games and Economic Behavior72(1): 77–85.
13.
ColmanAMPulfordBDKrockowEM (2018) Persistent cooperation and gender differences in repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma games: some things never change. Acta Psychologica187: 1–8.
14.
CrosonRGneezyU (2009) Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature47(2): 448–474.
15.
CrosonRMarksMSnyderJ (2008) Groups work for women: gender and group identity in social dilemmas. Negotiation Journal24(4): 411–427.
16.
CrossSEMadsonL (1997) Models of the self: self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin122: 5–37.
17.
DasguptaN (2004) Implicit in-group favoritism, out-group favoritism, and their behavioral manifestations. Social Justice Research17(2): 143–169.
18.
EaglyAH (1983) Gender and social influence: a social psychological analysis. American Psychologist38: 971–995.
19.
EaglyAH (2009) The his and hers of pro-social behavior: an examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist64: 644–658.
20.
EaglyAHWoodW (1991) Explaining sex differences in social behavior: a meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin17: 306–315.
21.
EalsMSilvermanI (1994) The hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays. Ethology and Sociobiology15: 95–105.
22.
EckelCCGrossmanPG (2008) Differences in the economic decisions of men and women: experimental evidence. In: PlottCSmithV (eds) Handbook of Experimental Economics Results. New York: Elsevier, pp. 509–519.
23.
EckelCCGrossmanPJ (2001) Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Economic Inquiry39: 171–188.
24.
EllemersNSpearsRDoosjeB (1997) Sticking together or falling apart: in-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology72(3): 617–626.
25.
EllingsenTJohannessonMMollerstromJ, et al. (2013) Gender differences in social framing effects. Economics Letters118(3): 470–472.
26.
FeingoldA (1994) Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin116: 429–456.
27.
FischbacherUGächterSFehrE (2001) Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economics Letters71(3): 397–404.
28.
FlinnMVLowBS (1986) Resource distribution, social competition, and mating patterns in human societies. In: RubinstienDWranghamR (eds) Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution: Birds and Mammals. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 217–243.
29.
GearyDC (2010) Male, Female: The Evolution of Human Sex Differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30.
GearyDCByrd-CravenJHaordMK, et al. (2003) Evolution and development of boys’ social behavior. Developmental Review23: 444–470.
31.
GreigFBohnetI (2009) Exploring gendered behavior in the field with experiments: why public goods are provided by women in a Nairobi slum. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization70: 1–9.
32.
GrujićJFoscoCAraujoL, et al. (2010) Social experiments in the mesoscale: humans playing a spatial prisoner’s dilemma. PLoS ONE5(11): e13749.
33.
HaselhuhnMPKennedyJAKrayLJ, et al. (2015) Gender differences in trust dynamics: women trust more than men following a trust violation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology56: 104–109.
34.
HydeJS (1991) Half the Human Experience: The Psychology of Women. Lexington, MA: Heath and Company.
35.
KleinHMWillermanL (1979) Psychological masculinity and femininity and typical and maximal dominance expression in women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology37: 2059–2070.
36.
LaFranceMCarmenB (1980) The nonverbal display of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology38: 36–49.
37.
LukinovaEMyagkovMShishkinP (2014) The value of sociality. Foresight16(4): 309–328.
38.
MaccobyEE (1990) Gender and relationships: a developmental account. American Psychologist45: 513–520.
39.
MaccobyEEJacklinCN (1974) The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
40.
NowakMASigmundK (1998) Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature393(6685): 573–577.
41.
OrbellJMDawesRSchwartz-SheaP (1994) Trust, social categories, and individuals: the case of gender. Motivation and Emotion18: 109–128.
42.
PeshkovskayaABabkinaTMyagkovM (2018) Social context reveals gender differences in cooperative behavior. Journal of Bioeconomics20: 213–225.
43.
PeshkovskayaAMyagkovMBabkinaT, et al. (2017a) Do women socialize better? Evidence from a study on sociality effects on gender differences in cooperative behavior. In: Proceedings of the CEUR workshop (Vol. 1968), pp. 41–51. Available at: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1968/paper5.pdf
44.
PeshkovskayaAGBabkinaTSMyagkovMG, et al. (2017b) The socialization effect on decision making in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game: an eye-tracking study. PLoS ONE12(4): e0175492.
45.
PutnamLLMcCallisterL (1980) Situational effects of task and gender on nonverbal display. In: NimnoD (ed.) Communication Yearbook 4. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, pp. 679–697.
46.
RioloRLCohenMDAxelrodR (2001) Evolution of cooperation without reciprocity. Nature414(6862): 441–443.
47.
RobbinsBG (2017) Status, identity, and ability in the formation of trust. Rationality and Society29(4): 408–448.
48.
SchwierenCSutterMC (2008) Trust in cooperation or ability? An experimental study on gender differences. Economic Letters99(3): 494–497.
49.
SerbinLAPowlishtaKKGulkoJ (1993) The development of sex typing in middle childhood. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development58: 1–99.
50.
SimpsonB (2006) Social identity and cooperation in social dilemmas. Rationality and Society18(4): 443–470.
51.
SolnickSJ (2001) Gender differences in the ultimatum game. Economic Inquiry39: 189–200.
52.
SpenceJT (1993) Gender-related traits and gender ideology: evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology64(4): 624–635.
53.
TajfelHBilligMGBundyRP, et al. (1971) Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology1(2): 149–178.
54.
VoyerDPostmaABrakeB, et al. (2007) Gender differences in objection location memory: a meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review14: 23–38.
55.
VoyerDVoyerSBrydenMP (1995) Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin117: 250–270.
56.
Van VugtMCremerDDJanssenDP (2007) Gender differences in cooperation and competition: the male-warrior hypothesis. Psychological Science18(1): 19–23.
57.
WittMGWoodW (2010) Self-regulation of gendered behavior in everyday life. Sex Roles62: 635–646.
58.
YamagishiTMifuneN (2009) Social exchange and solidarity: in-group love or out-group hate?Evolution and Human Behavior30: 229–237.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
