Why do states fail? Why do failed states persist without collapsing into complete anarchy? This paper argues that in response to insurgency or weakened state capacity, the best way for rulers to sustain their rule may be, paradoxically, to reduce the amount of political protection they provide to clients or citizens. This behavior recognizes and helps explain a puzzling feature of failed states, namely that central government often functions even when political disorder prevails. To evaluate this argument, the paper analyzes the case of King Stephen’s reign in medieval England. In response to a challenge to his succession, King Stephen dramatically decentralized government, a decision which has long puzzled historians. In addition, although far removed historically from contemporary cases, the reign of King Stephen exhibits just those characteristics of modern, failed states: insurgency, civil war, territorial fragmentation, increasing disorder and violence (even between adherents of the same side of the civil conflict), and yet the persistence of some amount of centralized rule.
BartlettR (2000) England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings, 1075–1225. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
3.
BatesRGreifASinghS (2002) Organizing violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution46(5): 599–628.
4.
BatesRH (2008) When Things Fell Apart: State Failure in Late-Century Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BatesRHGreifALeviM. (1998) Analytic Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
CollierPHoefflerA (2004) Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers56(4): 563–596.
7.
CooperN (2002) State collapse as business: The role of conflict trade and the emerging control agenda. Development and Change33(5): 935–955.
8.
CronneHA (1970). The Reign of Stephen, 1135–54: Anarchy in England. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
9.
CrouchD (2000) The Reign of King Stephen, 1135–1154. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
10.
DaltonP (1990) William Earl of York and royal authority in Yorkshire in the reign of Stephen. Haskins Society Journal2: 155–165.
11.
DaltonP (1994) Conquest, Anarchy and Lordship: Yorkshire, 1066–1154. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
DavisHWC (1903) The anarchy of Stephen’s reign. English Historical Review18(72): 630–641.
13.
DavisRHC (1990) King Stephen, 1135–1154. 3rd ed.London: Longman.
14.
DixitA (2003) On modes of economic governance. Econometrica71(2): 449–481.
15.
DixitAK (2004) Lawlessness and Economics: Alternative Modes of Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
ErmakoffI (2008) Ruling Oneself Out: A Theory of Collective Abdications. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
17.
FearonJDLaitinDD (2003) Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review97(1): 75–90.
18.
GreenJ (1992) Financing Stephen’s war. Anglo-Norman Studies14: 91–114.
19.
GreifA (2006) Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
GrossmanHIKimM (1995) Swords or plowshares? A theory of the security of claims to property. Journal of Political Economy103(6): 1275–1288.
21.
HironakaA (2005) Neverending Wars: The International Community, Weak States, and the Perpetuation of Civil War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
HirshleiferJ (1989) Conflict and rent-seeking success functions. Public Choice63(2): 101–112.
23.
HirshleiferJ (2000) The macrotechnology of conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution44(6): 773–792.
24.
HollisterCW (1994) The aristocracy. In: KingE (ed.) The Anarchy of King Stephen’s Reign. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 37–66.
25.
HollisterCWBaldwinJW (1978) The rise of administrative kingship: Henry I and Philip Augustus. American Historical Review83(4): 867–905.
26.
HudsonJ (1996) The Formation of the English Common Law: Law and Society in England from the Norman Conquest to Magna Carta. London: Longman.
27.
KingE (1994a) Introduction. In: KingE (ed.) The Anarchy of King Stephen’s Reign. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 1–36.
28.
KlareMT (2004) The deadly connection: Paramilitary bands, small arms diffusion, and state failure. In: RotbergRI (ed.) When States Fail: Causes and Consequences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 116–134.
29.
KrepsDM (1990) Corporate culture and economic theory. In: AltJEShepsleKA (eds) Perspectives on Positive Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 90–143.
30.
LatimerP (1986) Grants of ‘Totus Comitatus’ in twelfth-century England: Their origins and meaning. Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research59(140): 137–145.
31.
MilgromPRNorthDCWeingastBR (1990) The role of institutions in the revival of trade: The law merchant, private judges, and the champagne fairs. Economics and Politics2: 1–23.
32.
MusahAF (2002) Privatization of security, arms proliferation and the process of state collapse in Africa. Development and Change33(5): 911–933.
RenoW (1997) War, markets, and the reconfiguration of West Africa’s weak states. Comparative Politics29(4): 493–510.
35.
RenoW (1998) Warlord Politics and African States. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
36.
RotbergRI (2003) Failed states, collapsed states, weak states: Causes and indicators. In: RotbergRI (ed.) State Failure and State Weakness in a Time of Terror. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 1–25.
37.
ShammaJSArslanG (2005) Dynamic fictitious play, dynamic gradient play, and distributed convergence to nash equilibria. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control50(3): 312–327.
38.
SkaperdasS (1992) Cooperation, conflict, and power in the absence of property rights. American Economic Review82(4): 720–739.
StentonF (1961) The First Century of English Feudalism, 1066–1166. 2nd ed.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
41.
StrayerJR (1970) On the Medieval Origins of the Modern State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
TullockG (1980) Efficient rent seeking. In: BuchananJMTollisonRDTullockG (eds) Towards a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, pp. 97–112.
43.
WarrenWL (1987) The Governance of Norman and Angevin England, 1086–1272. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
44.
WhiteG (1994) Continuity in government. In: KingE (ed.) The Anarchy of King Stephen’s Reign. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 117–143.
45.
YoshitakeK (1988a) The arrest of the bishops in 1139 and its consequences. Journal of Medieval History14(2): 97–114.
46.
YoshitakeK (1988b) The exchequer in the reign of Stephen. English Historical Review103(409): 950–959.
