Gordon Allport defined intrinsic religious orientation as the polar opposite of the utilitarian and instrumental extrinsic orientation. On the other hand, Rodney Stark and associates developed a theory of religion according to which the utilitarian motive is at the very core of (any) religious motivation. A study of undergraduate students from three social settings with different dominant religions (Catholic, Islamic and Eastern Orthodox) showed that the intrinsic religious orientation and the perceived religious rewards, such as expectations of eternal life in heaven or perceptions of God’s help in everyday life, tend to form a unidimensional construct in all the observed samples. On the one hand, these results shed new light on the assumption of intrinsic religious orientation being free of utilitarian and instrumental motives. On the other hand, they lend substantial support to the basic assumption of the rational choice approach to religion.
Allport GW ( 1960) Personality and Social Encounter. Boston: Beacon.
2.
Allport GW and Ross MJ ( 1967) Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology5: 432-443.
3.
Bentler PM ( 1992) On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin112: 400-404.
4.
Brewer SM and Jozefowicz JJ ( 2006) Religious free riders: The impact of market share. In Stonebraker RJ (ed), Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion45(3): 389-396.
5.
Browne MW and Cudeck R. ( 1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen KA and Long JS (eds.). Testing Structural Equation Models, pp. 136-162. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
Brodin JA ( 2003) A matter of choice: A micro-level study on how Swedish new agers choose their religious beliefs and practices. Rationality and Society15(3): 381-405.
7.
Boudon R. ( 1992) The understanding of religious vitality needs additional factors. Rationality and Society4(4): 470-474.
8.
Chaves M. and Cann DE ( 1992) Regulation, pluralism, and religious market structure . Rationality and Society4(3): 272-290.
9.
Cohen AB, Hall DE, Koenig HG, and Meador KG ( 2005) Social versus individual motivation: Implications for normative definitions of religious orientation. Personality and Social Psychology Review9: 48-61.
10.
Ćimić E (1998) Bosnian crossroads. In Mojzes, P. (ed), Religion and the War in Bosnia, pp. 132-144. Atlanta: Scholars Press.
11.
Dittes JE ( 1971) Typing the typologies. Some parallels in the career of church-sect and extrinsic-intrinsic. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion10: 375-383.
12.
Donahue MJ ( 1985a) Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: A review and meta-analysis . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology48: 400-419.
13.
Donahue MJ ( 1985b) Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: The empirical research. Journal the Scientific Study of Religion24: 418-423.
14.
Durkheim E (1965[1912]) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. New York: The Free Press.
15.
Durkin JT and Greeley AM ( 1991) A model of religious choice under uncertainty: On responding rationally to the nonrational. Rationality and Society3(2): 178-196.
16.
Feagin JR ( 1964) Prejudice and religious types. A focused study of Southern Baptists. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion4: 3-13.
17.
Flere S. and Klanjšek R. ( 2008) Serbian Orthodox religiousness: An empirical and comparative portrait. Review of Religious Research50: 35-48.
18.
Flere S. and Lavrič M. ( 2007) Is intrinsic religious orientation a culturally specific American Protestant concept? The fusion of intrinsic and extrinsic religious orientation among non-Protestants. European Journal of Social Psychology38: 521-530.
19.
Ghorbani N., Watson PJ, Ghramaleki AF, Morris RJ, and Hood RWJr (2002) Muslim-Christian religious orientation scales: Distinctions, correlations, and cross-cultural analysis in Iran and the United States. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion12: 69-91.
20.
Ghorbani N. and Watson PJ ( 2006) Religious orientation types in Iranian Muslims: Differences in alexithymia, emotional intelligence, self-consciousness, and psychological adjustment. Review of Religious Research47: 303-310.
21.
Glock C. and Stark R. ( 1968) American Piety. The Nature of Religious Commitment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
Gorsuch RL ( 1994) Toward motivational theories of intrinsic religious commitment . Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion33(4): 315-325.
23.
Gorsuch RL and McPherson SE ( 1989) Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E revised in single item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion28: 348-354.
24.
Gorsuch RL and Venable DG ( 1983) Development of an ‘age-universal’ I-E scale . Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion12: 181-197.
25.
Gorsuch RL, Mylvaganam G., Gorsuch K., and Johnson, R.1997. Perceived religious motivation. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion7: 253-261.
26.
Hill PC and Hood RW ( 1999) Measures of Religiosity. Birmingham : Religious Education Press.
27.
Hovemyr M. ( 1998) The attribution of success and failure as related to different patterns of religious motivation. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion8: 107-124.
28.
Hunt RA and King M. ( 1971) The intrinsic-extrinsic concept: A review and evaluation . Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion10: 339-356.
29.
Iannaccone LR ( 1991) The consequences of religious market structure: Adam Smith and the economics of religion. Rationality and Society3(2): 156-177.
30.
Iannaccone LR ( 1992) Religious markets and the economics of religion. Social Compass39: 123-131.
31.
Kahoe R. ( 1976) The intrinsic and extrinsic dimensions: A value base for evaluating religious behaviour? In Donaldson, WJ (ed), Research in Mental Health and Religious Behaviour , pp. 178-190. Atlanta, GA: Psychological Studies Institute.
32.
Kaldestad E. and Stifoss-Hanssen H. ( 1993) Standardizing measures of religiosity for Norwegians. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion3: 111-124.
33.
Kirkpatrick LA ( 1989) A psychometric analysis of the Allport-Ross and Faegin measures of intrinsic-extrinsic religious orientation.’ In Moberg DO and Lynn ML (eds.) Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion , pp. 1-31. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
34.
Kwilecki S. and Wilson L. ( 1998) Was Mother Teresa maximizing her utility? An idiographic application of rational choice theory. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion37(2): 205-221.
35.
Lavrič M. and Flere S.(2010) Measuring religious costs and rewards in a cross-cultural perspective . Rationality and Society22(2): 223-236.
36.
Maltby J. and Day L. ( 1998) Amending a measure of the quest religious orientation . Personality and Individual Differences25: 517-522.
37.
McBride M. ( 2007) Free-riders, monitoring and exclusion in the LDS Church . Rationality and Society19: 395-424.
38.
Pargament K. ( 1992) Of means and ends: Religion and the search for significance . The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion2: 201-229.
39.
Pargament K. ( 2001) The Psychology of Religion and Coping: Theory, Research, Practice. New York: Guilford Publications .
40.
Ponton MO and Gorsuch RL ( 1988) Prejudice and religion revisited: A cross-cultural investigation with a Venezuelan sample. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion27: 260-271.
41.
Ryan K. and Fiorito B. ( 2003) Means-ends spirituality questionnaire: Reliability, validity, and relationship to psychological well-being. Review of Religious Research45: 130-154.
42.
Stark R. ( 2001) One True God: Historical Consequences of Monotheism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
43.
Stark R. and Bainbridge WS ( 1987) A Theory of Religion. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
44.
Stark R. and Finke R. ( 2000) Acts of Faith. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
45.
Stark R. and Iannaccone LR ( 1997) Why the Jehova’s Witnesses grow so rapidly: A theoretical application. Journal of Contemporary Religion12: 133-157.
46.
Strickland BR and Weddell CS ( 1972) Religious orientation, social prejudice and dogmatism: A study of Baptists and Unitarians. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion11: 395-399.
47.
Weber M. ( 1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
