Referring to classic rational choice models of criminal behaviour (Becker 1968), this paper presents an extended Subjective Expected Utility model that is more in line with the requirements of theorizing and empirical testing than former models. In our model, the decision of an actor is influenced by the expected utility of the crime and the norms that prohibit the delinquent action. It is suggested that there is an interaction between utility and norms which reflect different patterns of decision making leading to different probabilities for the occurrence of crimes. The model is tested by using survey data from Germany. Applying a new technique to uncover interaction effects reveals that in one pattern, internalized norms that label criminal action as not appropriate take effect instead of deliberation. In another pattern, the recognition that certain actions are connected to societal norms increases deliberation about costs and benefits of criminal behaviour.
Ai C., Norton EC ( 2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters80: 123-129.
2.
Ajzen I. ( 1991) The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes50: 179-211.
3.
Ajzen I, Fishbein M (eds) (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior . Englewood Cliffs, New York: Prentice-Hall .
4.
Becker GS ( 1968) Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy76: 169-217.
5.
Becker R., Mehlkop G. ( 2006) Social class and delinquency. Rationality and Society18: 193-235.
6.
Birbeck Ch, LaFree G. ( 1993) The situational analysis of crime and deviance. Annual Review of Sociology19: 113-137.
7.
Blau PM ( 1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley.
8.
Bueno de Mesquita B., Cohen LE ( 1995) Self-interest, equity, and self-control: A game-theoretic analysis of criminal decisions. Criminology33: 483-517.
9.
Chaiken S., Trope Y. ( 1999) Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology. New York: Guilford.
10.
Cloward R. ( 1968) Illegitime Mittel, Anomie und Abweichendes Verhalten. In: F Sack (ed.) Kriminalsoziologie . Frankfurt am Main: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, 314-339.
11.
Coleman JS ( 1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge : Belknap.
12.
Coleman JW ( 1985) The Criminal Elite. The Sociology of White Collar Crime . New York: St. Martin’s Press .
13.
Cornish DB, Clarke RV ( 1987) Understanding crime displacement: An application of rational choice theory. Criminology25: 933-947.
14.
Curti H. ( 1998) Abschreckung durch Strafe. Eine ökonomische Analyse der Kriminalität. Konstanz: DUV.
15.
Dahlbäck O. ( 2003) Analyzing Rational Crime - Models and Methods. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
16.
Davidson D. ( 1980) Essays on Action and Events. Oxford : Clarendon Press.
17.
Davis ML ( 1988) Time and punishment: An intertemporal model of crime. Journal of Political Economy96: 383-390.
18.
Diekmann A. ( 1980) Die Befolgung von Gesetzen. Empirische Untersuchungen zu einer rechtssoziologischen Theorie. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.
19.
Edelhertz H. ( 1980) White-collar crime. In: Edelhertz H, Rogovin C (eds) A National Strategy for Containing White-Collar Crime. Massachusetts and Toronto: Lexington Books, 119-213.
20.
Elster J. ( 1989a) The Cement of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Elster J. ( 1989b) Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Erickson ML, Jensen GF ( 1977) Delinquency is still group behavior! Toward revitalizing the group premise in the sociology of deviance. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology68: 262-273.
23.
Esser H. ( 1999) Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. Band 1: Situationslogik und Handeln. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
24.
Esser H. ( 2001) Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. Band 6: Sinn und Kultur . Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
25.
Fetschenhauer D. ( 1998) Versicherungsbetrug. Eine theoretische und empirische Analyse betrügerischen Verhaltens gegenüber einem anonymen Geschädigtem . Baden-Baden: Nomos.
26.
Fishbein M. ( 1967) Attitude and the prediction of behaviour. In: Fishbein M (ed.) Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement. New York: Wiley , 477-492.
27.
Fishbein M., Ajzen I. ( 1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior. An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
28.
Frey BS, Opp K-D. ( 1979) Anomie, Nutzen und Kosten. Eine Konfrontierung der Anomietheorie mit ökonomischen Hypothesen. Soziale Welt30: 275-294.
29.
Friedrichs J. ( 1997) Normenpluralität und abweichendes Verhalten. Eine theoretische und empirische Analyse. In: Heitmeyer W (ed.) Was treibt die Gesellschaft auseinander?Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 473-505.
30.
Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T. ( 1990) A General Theory of Crime. Stanford : Stanford University Press.
31.
Grasmick HG, Bursik J. Jr ( 1990) Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. Law and Society Review24: 837-861.
32.
Grasmick HG, Green DE ( 1981) Deterrence and the morally committed. The Sociological Quarterly22: 1-14.
33.
Green DP ( 1991) Inhibition, motivation, and self-reported involvement in drinking and driving behavior. Criminal Justice Review16: 1-16.
34.
Green DP, Shapiro I. ( 1999) Rational Choice. Eine Kritik am Beispiel von Anwendungen in der Politischen Wissenschaft. München: Oldenbourg.
35.
Grogger J. ( 1991) Certainty vs. severity of punishment. Economic Inquiry29: 297-310.
36.
Grogger J. ( 1998) Market wages and youth crime. Journal of Labor Economics16: 756-791.
37.
Haferkamp H. ( 1987) Zur zukünftigen Neuorientierung der kriminologischen Forschung. Kriminologisches Journal19: 171-192.
38.
Halla M., Schneider FG ( 2005) Taxes and benefits: Two distinct options to cheat on the state? Working paper.
39.
Heckhausen J., Schulz R. ( 1993) Optimisation by selection and compensation: Balancing primary and secondary control in life span development. International Journal of Behavioral Development16: 287-303.
40.
Herne K., Setälä M. ( 2004) A response to the critique of rational choice theory: Lakatos’ and Laudan’s conceptions applied. Inquiry47: 67-85.
41.
Hindelang M., Hirschi T., and Weis JG ( 1979) Correlates of delinquency: The illusion of discrepancy between self-reports and official measures. American Sociological Review44: 995-1014.
42.
Homel R. ( 1983) Drivers who drink and rational choice: Random breath testing and the process of deterrence. In: Clarke RV, Felson M (eds) Routine Activity and Rational Choice. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 59-84.
43.
Jaccard J., Turrisi R. ( 2003) Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. London: Sage.
44.
Katz L., Levitt SD, and Shustorovich E. ( 2003) Prison conditions, capital punishment, and deterrence . American Law and Economics Review5: 318-343.
45.
Koch A., Wasmer M., Harkness J., and Scholz E. ( 2001) Konzeption und Durchführung der ‘Allgemeinen Bevölkerungsumfrage der Sozialwissenschaften’ (ALLBUS) 2000. Mannheim: ZUMA-Methodenbericht 2001/05.
46.
Kroneberg C. ( 2005) Die Definition der Situation und die variable Rationalität der Akteure. Zeitschrift für Soziologie34: 344-363.
47.
Kroneberg C. ( 2007) Wertrationalität und das Modell der Frame-Selektion . Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie59: 215-239.
48.
McCarthy B. ( 2002) New economics of sociological criminology. Annual Review of Sociology28: 417-442.
49.
McKenzie RB, Tullock G. ( 1994) The New World of Economics. New York : McGraw-Hill.
50.
Matsueda RL, Kraeger DA, and Huizinga D. ( 2006) Deterring delinquents: A rational choice model of theft and violence. American Sociological Review71: 95-122.
51.
Merton RK ( 1968) Sozialstruktur und Anomie. In: Sack F (ed.) Kriminalsoziologie. Frankfurt am Main: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, 283-314.
52.
Mühlenfeld H-U ( 1999) Kriminalität als rationale Wahlhandlung. Eine empirische Überprüfung der Rational Choice-Theorie anhand des Schwarzfahrens . Stuttgart: edition451.
53.
Mummendey HD ( 1995) Die Fragebogenmethode. Göttingen : Hogrefe.
54.
Nagin DS, Pogarsky G. ( 2001) Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extralegal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: Theory and evidence. Criminology39: 865-891.
55.
Niggli MA ( 1994) Rational choice theory and crime prevention. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention3: 83-103.
56.
Norton EC, Wang H., and Ai CH ( 2004) Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata Journal4: 103-116.
57.
Opp K-D. ( 1989) The economics of crime and the sociology of deviant behaviour. A theoretical confrontation of basic propositions. Kyklos42: 405-430.
58.
Opp K-D. ( 1999) Contending conceptions of the theory of rational choice . Journal of Theoretical Politics11: 171-202.
59.
Osman M. ( 2004) An evaluation of the dual-process theories of reasoning . Psychonomic Bulletin and Review11: 988-1010.
60.
Parsons T. ( 1937) The Structure of Social Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
61.
Paternoster R. ( 1989) Decisions to participate in and desist from four types of common delinquency: Deterrence and the rational choice perspective. Law and Society23: 7-40.
62.
Paternoster R., Iovanni L. ( 1986) The deterrent effect of perceived severity: A reexamination . Social Forces64: 751-776.
63.
Pezzin L. ( 1995) Earning prospects, matching effects, and the decision to terminate a criminal career. Journal of Quantitative Criminology11: 29-50.
64.
Piliavin I., Thornton C., Gartner R., and Matsueda RL ( 1986) Crime, deterrence, and rational choice. American Sociological Review51: 101-119.
65.
Pogarsky G. ( 2004) Projected offending and contemporaneous rule-violation: Implications for heterotypic continuity, Criminology42: 111-135.
66.
Reuband K-H ( 2002). Subjektive Wahrscheinlichkeiten und Antwortmuster: Der Einfluss von Personenbezug und Skalierungsart. ZA-Information50: 46-58.
67.
Ridley M. ( 1996) The Origins of Virtue. London: Viking.
68.
Schnell R., Hill P., and Esser E. ( 2005). Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, 7th edition. München: Oldenbourg.
69.
Schick F. ( 1997) Making Choices. A Recasting of Decision Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70.
Scott J. ( 2000) Rational choice theory. In: Browning G, Halcli A, and Webster F (eds) Understanding Contemporary Society. London: Sage, 126-138.
71.
Silberman M. ( 1976) Toward a theory of criminal deterrence. American Sociological Review41: 442-461.
72.
Simon HA ( 1993) Homo Rationalis. Die Vernunft im menschlichen Leben. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
73.
Slovic P., Lichtenstein S. ( 1968) Relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking. Journal of Experimental Psychology78: 1-17.
74.
Sutherland EH, Cressey D. ( 1966) Principles of Criminology. Philadelphia and New York: Lippincott.
75.
Sykes GM ( 1978) Criminology. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
76.
Tsebelis G. ( 1990) Penalty has no impact on crime: A game-theoretic analysis . Rationality and Society2: 255-286.
77.
Tyler TR ( 1990) Why People Obey the Law. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
78.
Tyler TR ( 1997) Procedural fairness and compliance with the law. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics133: 219-240.
79.
Uggen C., Thompson M. ( 1999) The socioeconomic determinants of ill-gotten games: Within-person changes in drug-use and illegal earnings. Paper presented at the 94th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association .
80.
Urban D. ( 1993) Logit-Analyse. Statistische Verfahren zur Analyse von Modellen mit qualitativen Response-Variablen. Stuttgart : Fischer.
81.
Voss T., Abraham M. ( 2000) Rational choice theory in sociology: A survey. In: Quah SR (ed.) International Handbook of Sociology. London: Sage, 50-83.
82.
Wasmer M., Koch A., and Wiedenbeck M. ( 1991) Methodenbericht zur Allgemeinen Bevölkerungsumfrage der Sozialwissenschaften (ALLBUS) 1990. Mannheim: ZUMA-Arbeitsbericht 91/13.
83.
Wikström P-OH ( 2006) Individuals, settings, and acts of crime: Situational mechanisms and the explanation of crimes. In: Wikström P-OH, Sampson RJ (eds) The Explanation of Crime. Context, Mechanisms and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 61-107.
84.
Yee AS ( 1997) Thick rationality and the missing ‘brute fact’: The limits of rationalist incorporations of norms and ideas. The Journal of Politics59: 1001-1039.
