Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The article introduces unawareness of actions into the standard moral hazard model in contract theory. We allow the contracting party (the principal or the agent) to be unaware of his or the other party's actions. The principal may also have an incorrect belief about the awareness of the agent. We provide a solution concept where the principal contemplates the incentive scheme according to his conjecture of the agent's mind and also contemplates informing the agent through the contract. In the post-contractual stage, either party may be surprised by the other party's action. Finally, we analyze the value of awareness for each party, and present the negative result that awareness is not always valuable.

Keywords

moral hazard unawareness incomplete contracts rule-following bounded rationality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arthur, W.B. 1994. `Inductive Reasoning and Bounded Rationality. ' American Economic Review 84 (2): 406-11.

Aumann, R.J. 1976. `Agreeing to Disagree' Annals of Statistics 76 (4): 1236-9.

Bolton, P. and M. Dewatripont. 2005. Contract Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dekel, E. , B. Lipman and A. Rustichini. 1998. `Standard State-Space Models Preclude Unawareness.' Econometrica 66 (1): 159-73.

Feinberg, Y. 2005. `Games with Incomplete Awareness.' Mimeo. Stanford University.

Filiz-Ozbay, E. 2008. `Incorporating Unawareness into Contract Theory.' Mimeo . University of Maryland.

Gabaix, X. and D. Laibson. 2006. `Shrouded Attributes, Consumer Myopia, and Information Suppression in Competitive Markets.' Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 (2): 505-40.

Galanis, S. 2007. `Unawareness of Theorems.' Mimeo. University of Southampton.

Grossman, S. and O. Hart. 1983. `An Analysis of the Principal-Agent Problem.' Econometrica 51: 7-45.

10.

Hayek, F.A. 1967. `Rules, Perception and Intelligibility.' In Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, pp. 43-65, Chicago : University of Chicago Press.

11.

Hayek, F.A. 1978. `The Primacy of the Abstract.' In New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas, pp. 35-49, Chicago : University of Chicago Press.

12.

Heifetz, A. , M. Meier and B.C. Schipper. 2006. `Interactive Unawareness. ' Journal of Economic Theory 130: 78-94.

13.

Holmström, B. 1979. `Moral Hazard and Observability.' Bell Journal of Economics 10: 74-91.

14.

Holmström, B. and P. Milgrom. 1991. `Multitask Principal-Agent Analysis: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design.' Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 7: 24-52.

15.

Li, J. 2006. `Information Structures with Unawareness.' Mimeo. University of Pennsylvania.

16.

Mirrlees, J. 1975. `The Theory of Moral Hazard and Unobservable Behaviour: Part 1.' Review of Economic Studies 66: 3-21.

17.

Ozbay, E. 2008. `Unawareness and Strategic Announcements in Games with Uncertainty.' Mimeo. University of Maryland.

18.

Schwartz, A. and R. Scott. 2003. `Contract Theory and the Limits of Contract Law.' Yale Law Journal 113: 541-619.

19.

Vanberg, V. 2002. `Rational Choice vs. Program-based Behavior: Alternative Theoretical Approaches and Their Relevance for the Study of Institutions. ' Rationality and Society 14: 7-53.

20.

von Thadden, E. and X. Zhao. 2007. `Incentives for Unaware Agents' Mimeo. University of Mannheim.

21.

Wu, C. 1590. Journey to the West (translated by Collinson Fair). Beijing People's Press, 1955.

Moral Hazard With Unawareness

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References