How does the informational role of interest groups interact with institutions when politicians seek to control the bureaucracy? In 1992, Banks and Weingast argued that bureaucrats hold an informational advantage vis-à-vis political principals concerning policy-relevant variables, and that when it is prohibitively costly to audit, the agency may over- or understate the extent of a public problem. This is less likely to happen if there is a low-cost monitoring technology and if interest groups can monitor the agency's choices. I test this hypothesis using data on bureaucratic statements that estimate the importance of a number of hazardous waste problems from a group of state-level environmental agencies. The results provide evidence for the Banks—Weingast hypothesis.
Aboody, D. and R. Kasznik.2000. `CEO Stock Option Awards and the Timing of Corporate Voluntary Disclosures.' Journal of Accounting and Economics29(1): 73-100.
2.
Altfeld, Michael and Gary J. Miller .1984. `Sources of Bureaucratic Influence: Expertise and Agenda Control.' Journal of Conflict Resolution28: 701-30.
Austen-Smith, David.1997. `Interest Groups: Money, Information, and Influence.' In Perspectives on Public Choice, ed. Dennis C. Mueller.New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Banks, Jeffrey.1989. `Agency Budgets, Cost Information, and Auditing . ' American Journal of Political Science33: 670-99.
6.
Banks, Jeffrey and Barry Weingast.1992. `The Political Control of Bureaucracies under Asymmetric Information.' American Journal of Political Science36(2): 509-24.
7.
Bendor, Jonathon, Serge Taylor and Roland Van Gaalen .1987. `Politicians, Bureaucrats, and Asymmetric Information' American Journal of Political Science31(4): 796-828.
8.
Bennedsen, Morten and Sven Feldman.2002. `Lobbying Legislatures. ' Journal of Political Economy110(4): 919-46.
9.
Bernstein, Marver H.1955. Regulating Business by Independent Commission. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
10.
Bierle, Thomas C.2004. `The Benefits and Costs of Disclosing Information about Risks: What Do We Know about Right-to-Know?' Risk Analysis24(2): 335-46.
11.
Calvert, Randall L., Mathew D. McCubbins and Barry R. Weingast .1989. `A Theory of Political Control and Bureaucratic Discretion.'American Journal of Political Science33(3): 588-611.
12.
Carpenter, Daniel P. and David E. Lewis .2004. `Political Learning from Rare Events: Poisson Inference, Fiscal Constraints, and the Lifetime of Bureaus.'Political Analysis12(3): 201-32.
13.
Chemical and Engineering News.1989. `Growing Employment, Salaries Push up Chemical Energy Compensation.' 23 October 1989.
14.
Day Sue , Markland, Eiman Zein-Elabdin and Andrew B. Whitford .1991. State and Private Sector Cleanups. A volume in the Hazardous Waste Remediation Project. Knoxville, TN: Waste Management Research and Education Institute of the University of Tennessee.
15.
de Figueiredo, Rui J.F., Pablo T. Spiller and Santiago Urbiztondo .1999. `An Informational Perspective on Administrative Procedures.'Journal of Law, Economics and Organization15(1): 283-305.
16.
Diamond, D.W.1985. `Optimal Release of Information by Firms. ' Journal of Finance40: 1071-94.
17.
Epstein, David and Sharyn O'Halloran .1994. `Administrative Procedures, Information, and Agency Discretion.'American Journal of Political Science38(3): 697-722.
18.
Epstein, David and Sharyn O'Halloran .1995. `A Theory of Strategic Oversight - Congress, Lobbyists, and the Bureaucracy.'Journal of Law, Economics and Organization11(2): 227-55.
19.
Florini, Ann.1998. `The End of Secrecy.' Foreign Policy111: 50-63.
20.
Gailmard, Sean.2002. `Expertise, Subversion, and Bureaucratic Discretion.' Journal of Law, Economics and Organization18(2): 536-55.
21.
Gormley, William T., John Hoadley and Charles Williams .1983. `Potential Responsiveness in the Bureaucracy: Views of Public Utility Regulation.'American Political Science Review77: 704-17.
22.
Grant, Don Sherman.1997. `Allowing Citizen Participation in Environmental Regulation: An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Right-to-Sue and Right-to-Know Provisions on Industry's Toxic Emissions.'Social Science Quarterly78: 859-73.
23.
Gray, S.J.1984. Information Disclosure and the Multinational Corporation . Chichester: Wiley.
Hall, Bob and Mary Lee Kerr.1991. The 1991-1992 Green Index. Washington, DC: Island Press.
26.
Hamilton, James T.1995. `Pollution as News: Media and Stock Market Reactions to the Toxics Release Inventory Data.'Journal of Environmental Economics and Management28: 98-113.
27.
Hammond, Thomas H. and Jack H. Knott .1996. `Who Controls the Bureaucracy?: Presidential Power, Congressional Dominance, Legal Constraints, and Bureaucratic Autonomy in a Model of Multi-institutional Policy-making.'Journal of Law Economics & Organization12(1): 119-66.
28.
Hird, John A.1993. `Environmental Policy and Equity: The Case of Superfund.'Journal of Policy Analysis and Management12(2): 323-43.
29.
Johnson, Barry L.1995. `Nature, Extent, and Impact of Superfund Hazardous Waste Sites.'Chemosphere31(1): 2415-28.
30.
Johnson, Barry L. and Maureen Lichtveld .1993. `Superfund and Public Health Policies: An ATSDR Response.'Environmental Health Perspectives101(1): 12-13.
31.
Johnson, Lisa and Jared N. Day .2004. `Clean Sites and Toxic Burdens: The Evolution and Legacy of New Jersey's Mandatory Toxic Waste Cleanup Program, 1976-1993.'Journal of Policy History16(3): 239-67.
32.
Kiewiet, D. Roderick and Mathew D. McCubbins .1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Khanna, Madhu, W. Quimio and D. Bojilova.1998. `Toxic Release Information: A Policy Tool for Environmental Protection.' Journal of Environmental Economics and Management36(3): 243-66.
34.
Kleindorfer, Paul R. and Eric W. Orts .1998. `Informational Regulation of Environmental Risks.'Risk Analysis18: 155-70.
35.
Konar, Shameek and Mark A. Cohen .1997. `Information as Regulation: The Effect of Community Right-to-Know Laws on Toxic Emissions.'Journal of Environmental Economics and Management32(1): 109-24.
36.
Kosowatz, John J.1986. `Man of the Year: Marwan M. Sadat, Moving Decisively to Control and Contain Toxic Wastes in New Jersey.' Engineering News-Record 13 February 1986.
37.
Krause, George A.2003. `Coping with Uncertainty: Analyzing Risk Propensities of SEC Budgetary Decisions, 1949-1997.' American Political Science Review97: 171-88.
38.
Krehbiel, Keith.1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press .
39.
Lester, James P., James L. Franke, Ann O'M. Bowman and Kenneth W. Kramer .1983. `Hazardous Waste, Politics and Public Policy: A Comparative State Analysis.' Western Political Quarterly36: 257-85.
40.
List, John A. and Daniel M. Sturm .2006. `How Elections Matter: Theory and Evidence from Environmental Policy' Quarterly Journal of Economics121(4): 1249-81.
41.
McCallum, David B., Sharon L. Hammond and Vincent T. Covello .1991. `Communicating about Environmental Risks: How the Public Uses and Perceives Information Sources.' Health Education Quarterly18(3): 349-61.
42.
McCubbins, Mathew D. and Thomas Schwartz .1984. `Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols vs. Fire Alarms' American Journal of Political Science28: 165-79.
43.
McCubbins, Mathew D., Roger G. Noll and Barry R. Weingast .1990. `Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control.' Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations3: 243-77.
44.
Magat, Wesley A. and W. Kip Viscusi .1992. Informational Approaches to Regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
Maxwell, John W., Thomas P. Lyon and Steven C. Hackett .2000. `Self-regulation and Social Welfare: The Political Economy of Corporate Environmentalism' Journal of Law and Economics43: 583-617.
46.
Niskanen, William.1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago, IL: Aldine Press.
47.
Office of Technology Assessment (OTA).1983 . `Technologies and Management Strategies for Hazardous Waste Control' Washington, DC: Congress of the US, Office of Technology Assessment. US Government Printing Office .
48.
O'Leary, Rosemary.1995. `The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act: Ten Public Management Challenges for State and Local Governments ' Public Productivity and Management Review18(3): 293-310.
49.
Peters, Richard G., Vincent T. Covello and David B. McCallum .1997. `The Determinants of Trust and Credibility in Environmental Risk Communication: An Empirical Study' Risk Analysis17(1): 43-54.
50.
Robinson, James C.1990. `Worker Responses to Occupational Risk of Cancer ' The Review of Economics and Statistics72(3): 536-41.
51.
Russell, Milton, E. William Colglazier and Mary R. English .1991. Hazardous Waste Remediation: The Task Ahead. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee.
52.
Sage, William M.1999. `Regulating through Information: Disclosure Laws and American Health Care' Columbia Law Review99: 1701-1825.
53.
Sunstein, Cass R.1999. `Informational Regulation and Informational Standing: Akins and Beyond' University of Pennsylvania Law Review147: 613-75.
54.
Thaler, Richard and Sherwin Rosen.1976. `The Value of Saving a Life: Evidence from a Labor Market' In Household Production and Consumption , ed. Nester E. Terleckyi.New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
55.
Tietenberg, Tom.1998. `Disclosure Strategies for Pollution Control. ' Environmental and Resource Economics11: 587-602
56.
Ting, Michael M.2002. `A Theory of Jurisdictional Assignments in Bureaucracies ' American Journal of Political Science46(2): 364-78.
57.
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).1991. An Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-State Study, 1990 Update. Washington, DC: Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, USEPA.
58.
US General Accounting Office (USGAO).1987 . Superfund: Extent of Nation's Potential Hazardous Waste Problem Is Still Unknown. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
59.
Volden, Craig.2002. `A Formal Model of the Politics of Delegation in a Separation of Powers System.' American Journal of Political Science46(1): 111-33.
60.
Weingast, Barry R.1984. `The Congressional-Bureaucratic System: A Principal-Agent Perspective (with Applications to the SEC)' Public Choice44: 147-91.
61.
Williams, B.A. and A.R. Matheny.1984. `Testing Theories of Social Regulation: Hazardous Waste Regulation in theAmerican States.' Journal of Politics46(2): 428-59.
62.
Wolf, Sidney M.1996. `Fear and Loathing about the Public Right to Know: The Surprising Success of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act ' Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law11(2): 217-325.
