The low-cost hypothesis predicts that the strength of effects of environmental concern on environmental behavior diminishes with increasing behavioral costs. Thus, environmental concern influences environmental behavior primarily in situations and under conditions connected with low costs and little inconvenience for individual actors. In a first step, we develop and specify this hypothesis. Referring to two procedures, we then test it on the basis of an environmental survey of a random sample of 2307 respondents from the German population. The empirical evidence is positive. The low-cost hypothesis is not confined to the area of environmental research. It points to general limits of attitude-research (in high-cost situations) and to general limits of rational-choice theory (in low-cost situations), and suggests a strategy for integrating research in social psychology, sociology, and economics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ajzen, I. 1988. Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Milton Keynes: Open University Press .
2.
Ajzen, I. and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall .
3.
Barry, B. 1978. Sociologists, Economists and Democracy. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press .
4.
Black, S. J., P. C. Stern, and J. T. Elworth. 1985. `Personal and Contextual Influences on Household Energy Adaptations.' Journal of Applied Psychology70: 3-21 .
5.
Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
6.
Derksen, L. and J. Gartrell. 1993. `The Social Context of Recycling.' American Sociological Review58: 434-442 .
7.
Diekmann, A. and P. Preisendörfer. 1998. `Environmental Behavior. Discrepancies between Aspirations and Reality.' Rationality and Society10: 79-102 .
8.
Domencich, T. and D. L. McFadden. 1975. Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioral Analysis. North-Holland Publishing .
9.
Dunlap, R. E. and R. Scarce. 1991. `The Polls-Poll Trends: Environmental Problems and Protection.' Public Opinion Quarterly55: 651-672 .
10.
Fehr, E., U. Fischbacher and E. Tougarova. 2002. Do High Stakes and Competition Undermine Fairness? Evidence from Russia. Working Paper No. 120, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics: University of Zurich .
11.
Franzen, A. 1995. `Trittbrettfahren oder Engagement? Überlegungen zum Zusammenhang zwischen Umweltbewusstsein und Umweltverhalten.' In Kooperatives Umwelthandeln, eds A. Diekmann and A. Franzen, pp. 133-149. Zürich: Rüegger .
12.
Frey, B. S. 1997. Not Just for the Money. An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation. Cheltenham, UK and Brookfield, USA: Edward Elgar .
13.
Gardner, G. T. and P. C. Stern. 1996. Environmental Problems and Human Behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon .
14.
Guagnano, G. A., P. C. Stern and T. Dietz. 1995. `Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships. A Natural Experiment with Curbside Recycling.' Environment and Behavior27: 699-718 .
15.
Hines, J. M., H. R. Hungerford and A. N. Tomera. 1986/87. `Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior: A Meta-Analysis.' Journal of Environmental Education18: 1-8 .
16.
Kirchgässner, G. 1992. `Towards a Theory of Low-Cost Decisions.' European Journal of Political Economy8: 305-320 .
17.
Kirchgässner, G. and W. W. Pommerehne. 1993. `Low-Cost Decisions as a Challenge to Public Choice.' Public Choice77: 107-115 .
18.
Littig, B. 1995. Die Bedeutung von Umweltbewuβtsein im Alltag. Frankfurt/Main: Lang .
19.
Lüdemann, C. 1993. `Diskrepanzen zwischen theoretischem Anspruch und forschungspraktischer Wirklichkeit. Eine Kritik der Untersuchung über `Persönliches Umweltverhalten: Diskrepanzen zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit' von Andreas Diekmann und Peter Preisendörfer.' Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie45: 116-124 .
20.
North, D. C. 1986. `The New Institutional Economics.' Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics142: 230-237 .
21.
OECD. 1994. Managing the Environment: The Role of Economic Instruments. Paris .
22.
Oliner, S. P. 2003 Do Unto Others. Extraordinary Acts of Ordinary People. Boulder, CO: Westview Press .
23.
Oliner, S. P. and P. M. Oliner. 1992. The Altruistic Personality. Rescuers of Jews in Nazi Europe. New York: Free Press .
24.
Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
25.
Preisendörfer, P. 1996. Umweltbewuβtsein in Deutschland. Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage 1996. Bonn: Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit .
26.
Rabin, M. 1993. `Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics.' American Economic Review83: 1281-1302 .
27.
Rat der Sachverständigen für Umweltfragen. 1978. Umweltgutachten 1978. Bonn: Deutscher Bundestag .
28.
Schahn, J. 1996. Die Erfassung und Veränderung des Umweltbewuβtseins. Frankfurt/Main: Lang .
29.
Schupp, J. and G. Wagner. 1998. `Die Entwicklung der Umweltsorgen seit 1984 und ihre individuellen Determinanten.' In Umwelt und empirische Sozial- und Wirtschaftsforschung, eds J. Schupp and G. Wagner, pp. 167-185. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot .
30.
Steiner, J. 1996. Conscience in Politics. An Empirical Investigation of Swiss Decision Cases. New York: Garland .
31.
Stern, P. C. 1992. `Psychological Dimensions of Global Environmental Change.' Annual Review of Psychology43: 269-302 .
32.
Stern, P. C. and E. Aronson. 1984. Energy Use. The Human Dimension. New York: Freeman .
33.
Thaler, R. H. 1992. The Winner's Curse - Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life. New York: Free Press .
34.
Tyler, T. R., R. Orwin and L. Schurer. 1982. `Defensive Denial and High Cost Prosocial Behavior.' Basic and Applied Social Psychology3: 267-281 .
35.
Ungar, S. 1994. `Apples and Oranges: Probing the Attitude-Behaviour Relationship for the Environment.' Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology31: 288-304 .
36.
Van Liere, K. D. and R. E. Dunlap. 1981. `Environmental Concern: Does It Make a Difference How It's Measured?' Environment and Behavior13: 651-676 .
37.
Weigel, R. H. 1983. `Environmental Attitudes and the Prediction of Behavior.' In Environmental Psychology, eds N. R. Feimer and E. S. Geller, pp. 257-287. New York: Praeger .
38.
Weizsaecker, E. U. and J. Jesinghaus. 1992. Ecological Tax Reform. London, NJ: Zed Books .
39.
Wortmann, K. 1994. Psychologische Determinanten des Energiesparens. Weinheim: Beltz .
40.
Zintl, R. 1989. `Der Homo Oeconomicus: Ausnahmeerscheinung in jeder Situation oder Jedermann in Ausnahmesituationen?' Analyse und Kritik11: 52-69 .
